[Bug c++/90484] [9 Regression] ICE in equal_mem_array_ref_p at gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.c:550 since r270433 on i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90484 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 17 19:54:15 2019 New Revision: 271356 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271356&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-05-16 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/54613] [F08] Add FINDLOC plus support MAXLOC/MINLOC with KIND=/BACK=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 17 19:54:46 2019 New Revision: 271357 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271357&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/54613 * gfortran.map (GFORTRAN_9.2): New symbo

[Bug fortran/54613] [F08] Add FINDLOC plus support MAXLOC/MINLOC with KIND=/BACK=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 17 19:56:14 2019 New Revision: 271358 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271358&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/54613 * gfortran.map (GFORTRAN_9.2): Export _g

[Bug tree-optimization/90525] New: Wrong offsets in warning text for -Warray-bounds (with subobject)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90525 Bug ID: 90525 Summary: Wrong offsets in warning text for -Warray-bounds (with subobject) Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/90038] execute_command_line should not use fork()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90038 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist --- This should fix it: --- a/libgfortran/intrinsics/execute_command_line.c +++ b/libgfortran/intrinsics/execute_command_line.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If no

[Bug debug/90197] [8 Regression] Cannot step through simple loop at -O -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90197 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] Cannot |[8 Regression] Cannot step

[Bug c++/90383] [9 Regression] GCC generates invalid constexpr copy/move assignment operators for types with trailing padding. (Again)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90383 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90385] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt, at tree-parloops.c:1772

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90385 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90303] [9 Regression] ICE in hash_odr_name with fastcall attribute starting with r267359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90484] [9 Regression] ICE in equal_mem_array_ref_p at gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.c:550 since r270433 on i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90484 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/90526] New: Missing DW_AT_const_value for constexpr field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90526 Bug ID: 90526 Summary: Missing DW_AT_const_value for constexpr field Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/90521] error: names the constructor, not the type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90521 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/88406] [9/10 regression] Many 64-bit Solaris 10/SPARC execution tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88406 --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Is this still worth investigating given that we've dropped support for Solaris 10?

[Bug libfortran/90038] execute_command_line should not use fork()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90038 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist --- Actually, wasn't this simple as the above patch broke the synchronous version. Need to think more what to do.

[Bug c++/90521] error: names the constructor, not the type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90521 --- Comment #4 from colton.wernet at linquest dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > The code is just wrong and should be fixed by removing "::basic_string". > > I don't see that wrong code in the upstream gdal code, so it l

[Bug target/42017] gcc compiling C for ARM has stopped using r14 in leaf functions?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/9831] [ARM] Peephole for multiple load/store could be more effective.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9831 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/38570] [arm] -mthumb generates sub-optimal prolog/epilog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 from Wi

[Bug target/38570] [arm] -mthumb generates sub-optimal prolog/epilog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/16996] [meta-bug] code size improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996 Bug 16996 depends on bug 38570, which changed state. Bug 38570 Summary: [arm] -mthumb generates sub-optimal prolog/epilog https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/41999] Bug in generation of interrupt function code for ARM processor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41999 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/90520] [10 regression] libstdc++-xmethods/unique_ptr.cc triggers python failure starting with r271158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90520 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri May 17 23:08:00 2019 New Revision: 271363 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271363&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/90520 adjust Xmethod for recent unique_ptr changes

[Bug testsuite/90520] [10 regression] libstdc++-xmethods/unique_ptr.cc triggers python failure starting with r271158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90520 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/90517] [10 regression] test case gcc.dg/cdce1.c fails (unresolved) starting with r271281

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90517 JunMa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||JunMa at linux dot alibaba.com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug libgomp/90527] New: alloc.c:72:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘posix_memalign’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90527 Bug ID: 90527 Summary: alloc.c:72:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘posix_memalign’ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/90527] alloc.c:72:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘posix_memalign’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90527 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2