https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90220
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
that's a known (to me) problem; it's mentioned in the gOlogy report, and IIRC I
even highlighted it in the slides about it
I spent some time looking for a low-hanging fix a while ago, but came out
empty-ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90232
Bug ID: 90232
Summary: gcc drops top-level dies with -fdebug-types-section
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 24, 2019 5:04:37 PM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231
>
>Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90232
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
With this demonstrator patch:
...
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index b9a624e1ac7..1e818973fae 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
@@ -8400,10 +8400,11 @@ generate_skeleton (dw_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90233
Bug ID: 90233
Summary: std::hash()(INFINITY) == std::hash()(0)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 24 15:49:36 2019
New Revision: 270550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270550&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/90193
* rtl.c (classify_insn): Return JUMP_INSN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90234
Bug ID: 90234
Summary: 503.bwaves_r is 6% slower on Zen CPUs at -Ofast with
native march/mtune than with generic ones
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90233
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90235
Bug ID: 90235
Summary: Unnecessary save and restore frame pointer with
AVX/AVX512 pseudo registers
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90233
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Jonath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82171
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the order doesn't matter in this case, as debug stmts can't have PHIs
ATM and that is what you either immediately or soonish end up with.
The only thing it changes is IMHO whether the D#1 appears in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89432
--- Comment #6 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Wed Apr 24 18:57:36 2019
New Revision: 270554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270554&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libphobos: Fix FAIL phobos.exp/core.time on CentOS 5.11, Lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90236
Bug ID: 90236
Summary: bogus error with auto non-type template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90236
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90186
--- Comment #2 from austin.card at torchtechnologies dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note that using #pragma pack(1) on struct Ipv4 makes u_short members not
> naturally aligned and thus code like
>
> void Updat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89432
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #89 from Zaak ---
Anyone have a patch for 4.9? A user wants one, but I can't build 4.9 from
source on Mojave.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90227
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 24 20:37:30 2019
New Revision: 270556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270556&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/90227 - error with template parameter packs.
If require_al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90236
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Clearly it's this hunk:
@@ -6985,27 +7071,10 @@ convert_nontype_argument (tree type, tree expr,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
itself value-dependent, since what we want here is its address. */;
els
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90229
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
I can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90237
Bug ID: 90237
Summary: Bogus warning from -Wdo-subscript
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238
Bug ID: 90238
Summary: Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds, triggered by
zero-length character literal
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90236
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Apr 24 21:28:04 2019
New Revision: 270557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270557&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/90236
* g++.dg/cpp1z/nontype-auto16.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238
--- Comment #1 from Rich Townsend ---
An even-simpler demo:
--
program test_str_2
write(*,*) ''
end program test_str_2
--
Compile with -O2 -Warray-bounds gives
test_str_2.f90:3:0:
write(*,*) ''
Warning: array subscript 1 is above arra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90237
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90237
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90237
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:01:13PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
> We should probably rename the option. It works as advertised:
A renaming is probably not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90086
--- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Wed Apr 24 22:46:59 2019
New Revision: 270560
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270560&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libphobos: Fix linker warning and SEGV in core.thread tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90086
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90088
--- Comment #6 from Sunil Pandey ---
We look into this issue and tested lea vs lea equivalent on following
processor.
On Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake/CoffeeLake processors, lea is faster than
alternative.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238
--- Comment #3 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> -Warray-bounds is a generic GCC option, and is used in the
> middle end for reporting warnings. When you use this option
> it does not recognize that a Fortran string is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:41:10AM +, townsend at astro dot wisc.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238
>
> --- Comment #3 from Rich Townsend ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231
bin cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238
--- Comment #5 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)
> It's certainly confusing. gfortran.info includes
> -Warray-bounds as a warning option, but there is no
> description for the option. Grepping the gfortran
> sour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90106
--- Comment #8 from JunMa ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #6)
> Reopening and confirming, GCC's code looks less efficient than possible for
> no good reason.
>
> CDCE does
>
> y = sqrt (x);
> ==>
> y = IFN_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85541
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90106
--- Comment #9 from JunMa ---
(In reply to JunMa from comment #7)
> yes, the transformation in CDEC prevent the tail call optimization. let's
> check the return stmt in CDEC pass.
Sorry for the confused comment.
As the discussion above, The cd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkorb at gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26613
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Mark F. Haigh from comment #5)
> > > Created attachment 11005 [details]
> > > Fix for trunk (against
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37874
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #6 from Eric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89043
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
Anyways my point about bringing up which standards stpcpy() is in is to remind
people to keep portability concerns in mind when doing this change. Please
check the gnulib docs on stpcpy() for specifics:
https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90239
Bug ID: 90239
Summary: [C++20] scoped_allocator_adaptor should support nested
pair
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240
Bug ID: 90240
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
