https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90216
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79183
--- Comment #9 from Roland Illig ---
Is there already someone who wants to fix the remaining messages?
Jakub, you fixed some of them already in
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258154&root=gcc&view=rev in March 2018.
There are still some message
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90176
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46234|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90217
Bug ID: 90217
Summary: Greater optimization of C++ Code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90117
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Makes sense, I'll integrate that to our linter.
I've already integrated that into the linter, see the latest attachment in bug
90176.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431
--- Comment #4 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Wed Apr 24 02:04:04 2019
New Revision: 270531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libphobos: Fix link build errors when compiling with unsuppo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
It seems such code generation is r254855's intention.
/* Use 256-bit AVX instructions instead of 512-bit AVX
instructions
4695 in the auto-vectorizer. */
4696 if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90218
Bug ID: 90218
Summary: [PDT] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have
record_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at
fortran/trans-array.c:6071
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> It seems such code generation is r254855's intention.
>
> /* Use 256-bit AVX instructions instead of 512-bit AVX
> instructions
> 4695
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44435
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174
--- Comment #3 from Feng Xue ---
Created attachment 46237
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46237&action=edit
test case for aarch64
Add another case composed for aarch64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90217
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Please always attach your testcases to bugzilla.
I took a look at the .optimized dump.
First issue is that we fail to simplify
MEM[(union ._1 *)&apart] = 1;
_3 = apart.D.2494.contam_level;
Second issue i
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo