[Bug middle-end/90216] Stack Pointer decrementing even when not loading extra data to stack.

2019-04-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90216 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug translation/79183] Hard coded plurals in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:2050

2019-04-23 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79183 --- Comment #9 from Roland Illig --- Is there already someone who wants to fix the remaining messages? Jakub, you fixed some of them already in https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258154&root=gcc&view=rev in March 2018. There are still some message

[Bug translation/90176] diagnostics should generally contain underscore only inside quotes

2019-04-23 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90176 Roland Illig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #46234|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/90217] New: Greater optimization of C++ Code

2019-04-23 Thread stevexiong98 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90217 Bug ID: 90217 Summary: Greater optimization of C++ Code Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ As

[Bug translation/90117] Replace %<%s%> with %qs

2019-04-23 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90117 --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Makes sense, I'll integrate that to our linter. I've already integrated that into the linter, see the latest attachment in bug 90176.

[Bug d/88431] link errors on build

2019-04-23 Thread ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431 --- Comment #4 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Wed Apr 24 02:04:04 2019 New Revision: 270531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270531&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libphobos: Fix link build errors when compiling with unsuppo

[Bug d/88431] link errors on build

2019-04-23 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/89735] FAIL: gdc.dg/runnable.d -O0 execution test

2019-04-23 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

2019-04-23 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- It seems such code generation is r254855's intention. /* Use 256-bit AVX instructions instead of 512-bit AVX instructions 4695 in the auto-vectorizer. */ 4696 if

[Bug fortran/90218] New: [PDT] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6071

2019-04-23 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90218 Bug ID: 90218 Summary: [PDT] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6071 Product: gcc Vers

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

2019-04-23 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2) > It seems such code generation is r254855's intention. > > /* Use 256-bit AVX instructions instead of 512-bit AVX > instructions > 4695

[Bug other/44435] gengtype: don't test undefined value after vasprintf failure

2019-04-23 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44435 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dj at redhat dot com,

[Bug rtl-optimization/90174] Bad register spill due to top-down allocation order

2019-04-23 Thread fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174 --- Comment #3 from Feng Xue --- Created attachment 46237 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46237&action=edit test case for aarch64 Add another case composed for aarch64.

[Bug c++/90217] Greater optimization of C++ Code

2019-04-23 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90217 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Please always attach your testcases to bugzilla. I took a look at the .optimized dump. First issue is that we fail to simplify MEM[(union ._1 *)&apart] = 1; _3 = apart.D.2494.contam_level; Second issue i

<    1   2