https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90073
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
Looking at the attached asm, the main issue is PR 55266 (there should be no
copying), and how exactly the copies are done (64/128/256 bits) is almost a
detail...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #19)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #15)
> > > Popping a5(r116,l0) -- assign reg 3
> > > Poppi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
It's a latent issue which affects 4.8-6, and 8-trunk. Gcc-7 works fine.
It happens at -O3 only. Bisect between gcc-7 and gcc-8 points to r255267.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 9.0.1 201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90075
Bug ID: 90075
Summary: [AArch64] ICE during RTL pass when member of union
passed to copysignf
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90076
Bug ID: 90076
Summary: Polymorphic Allocate on Assignment Memory Leak
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
--- Comment #21 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #20)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #18)
> > > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #15)
> > > > Popping a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82081
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82081
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 46157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46157&action=edit
fix
Here's a patch. I'm not sure if it will go into GCC 9 or 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89933
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 12 21:45:54 2019
New Revision: 270329
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270329&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/89933
c/
* c-decl.c (merge_decls): When newdecl's typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89933
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89798
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Apr 12 22:37:12 2019
New Revision: 270331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit a change missed in r270326:
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89797
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Apr 12 22:37:12 2019
New Revision: 270331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit a change missed in r270326:
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89288
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Apr 12 22:37:12 2019
New Revision: 270331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit a change missed in r270326:
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88383
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Apr 12 22:37:12 2019
New Revision: 270331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit a change missed in r270326:
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
--- Comment #22 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #21)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #20)
>> The question is why p116 conflicts with hr0. Before RA we have
>
> That's a bug since register copies should not cr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90070
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
--- Comment #23 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It says (I added some debug)
Insn 50(l0): point = 27
ignoring for conflicts:
(reg:SI 0 r0 [ a ])
but non_conflicting_reg_copy_p isn't called at all where it is improving
the allocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
--- Comment #24 from Peter Bergner ---
So improve_allocation() initially looks at using r0, but disregards it because
check_hard_reg_p() returns false for r0, and that is because we fail this test:
/* Checking only profitable hard regs. */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90077
Bug ID: 90077
Summary: musl has no multlib support
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90077
Jory A. Pratt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46158|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17108
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90078
Bug ID: 90078
Summary: ICE with deep templates caused by overflow [PATCH]
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo