https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948
Bug ID: 89948
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:2430
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89949
Bug ID: 89949
Summary: Internal compiler error with lambda as template
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89646
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I meant "replace the 0".
The replacement could be OPT_Wsurprising (-Wsurprising, included in -Wall) or
OPT_Wextra (-Wextra) or yet a new option.
The warning is tested in gfortran.dg/elemental_depen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89950
Bug ID: 89950
Summary: attribute aligned ignored with attribute vector_size
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41650
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #11 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89951
Bug ID: 89951
Summary: Uncorrect flag for Nehalem / westmere
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89730
--- Comment #2 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: qinzhao
Date: Wed Apr 3 19:00:25 2019
New Revision: 270134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-03 qing zhao
PR tree-optimization/89730
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744
--- Comment #5 from Bader at lrz dot de ---
This is still not fixed in current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89952
Bug ID: 89952
Summary: S/390: Inconsistent CFI info when restoring frame
pointer from fpr
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89952
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 46083
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46083&action=edit
Experimental patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89946
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89947
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #20 from Erik Schnetter ---
I have a patch that works for 8.3.0. It doesn't work for 9.0.0 (i.e. an svn
checkout); I'm working on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 3 20:09:17 2019
New Revision: 270135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/89331 - ICE with offsetof in incomplete class.
We were abo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86586
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 3 20:12:00 2019
New Revision: 270136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86586 - -fcompare-debug=-Wsign-compare.
This patch limits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86586
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
Bug 86518 depends on bug 86586, which changed state.
Bug 86586 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-compare affects code generation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86586
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Bug ID: 89953
Summary: ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1244
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #36 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
--- Comment #37 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #36)
> I wonder if we could pass in a scratch register from try_combine down to
> make_field_assignment to facilitate something like this...
I have found that make_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Wed Apr 3 21:32:13 2019
New Revision: 270137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-03 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/68567
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 3 21:51:36 2019
New Revision: 270138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81866 - ICE with member template and default targ.
This te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE with |[7/8 Regression] ICE with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 46084
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46084&action=edit
Hyphen compounds: assumed shape and other related ones
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 46085
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46085&action=edit
Adjust the tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_4.f03: type(modtype(8,*)) :: mod_r ! {
dg-error "ASSUMED type parameters" }
The test is not part of the attached patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331
--- Comment #7 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> But when we're in the middle of the class definition we don't know yet
> whether it's standard-layout, so we can't answer yet. A compiler is allowed
> to reorder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 89823, which changed state.
Bug 89823 Summary: Composed message only partially translatable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89823
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89823
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89255
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46060|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
--- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #37)
> (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #36)
> > I wonder if we could pass in a scratch register from try_combine down to
> > make_field_assignment to facilita
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89937
--- Comment #2 from Walt Karas ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is because of the way inline have different semantics between the two
> langauges.
>
> If I change TSFastDbg to be static instead of just inline, then the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934
JunMa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||JunMa at linux dot alibaba.com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
Bug ID: 89954
Summary: missed optimization for signed extension for x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89893
--- Comment #10 from 康 珊 ---
Hi Martin Liška, I tried to build it with "-O3 -fno-strict-aliasing
-falign-functions=32 -fno-math-errno -fno-semantic-interposition
-fno-trapping-math", but it still had the issue. Can "-fno-strict-aliasing"
work nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86928
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #5)
> I didn't have any better ideas, so fixed via comment #2.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> I would guess so. I wonder if the combiner could restrict itself
> here? Maybe LUID "distances" are an approximation? Doesn't the
> combiner use DF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375
--- Comment #5 from Fritz Reese ---
Thanks Dominiq.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 05:02 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375
>
> Dominique d'Humieres changed:
>
>W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89955
Bug ID: 89955
Summary: riscv.h improperly defines STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC spec
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86986
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #21 from Erik Schnetter ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg00162.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89956
Bug ID: 89956
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
gsi_for_stmt(gimple*))
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957
Bug ID: 89957
Summary: ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known
range
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89956
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89956
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89958
Bug ID: 89958
Summary: ICE and duplicate diagnostic with invalid return value
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89951
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||P at draigBrady dot com
--- Comment #9 f
101 - 160 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
