https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89400
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89399
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87716
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12)
> (In reply to Daniel Vollmer from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 46036 [details]
> > Example triggering "This was likely caused by different translation units
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89853
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Doh, yes, copy-paste error, sorry. The data should have been:
FAST:
Performance counter stats for 'numactl -C 0 -l specinvoke':
495413.105450 task-clock:u (msec) #0.999 CPUs utilized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89833
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89835
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[9 Regression] Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89856
Bug ID: 89856
Summary: `ld: warning: direct access to global weak symbol
means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime`
using LTO with optimization and -fprofile-generate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89855
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The same problem exists for ::div in , and for ::abs in both
and . Calling ::abs(INT_MAX + 1LL) or abs(INT_MAX + 1LL) will overflow
and so is undefined.
Clang warns about this and suggests using std::abs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89856
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Vollmer ---
Initial analysis from Iain Sandoe
> OK (initial analysis). what we have is
>
> __ZGVZ19BroadcastFromMasterImEvPT_mE4bufs:
> .space 8
>
>
> LPX0:
>
>
> and then a reference to LPX0 in __GLOB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Vollmer ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> Please pick one - and make a new PR for the second (probably this stuff
> is quite self-contained and could be split out) ... we can then retitle the
> exis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88596
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87489
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89856
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-*-darwin*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86753
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89857
Bug ID: 89857
Summary: list-initialization of unnamed, non-const reference
type
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89855
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #15 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89857
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77875
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leni536 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77875
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89855
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
DR 456: PR6257
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 27 18:39:20 2019
New Revision: 269972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/89241 - ICE with lambda in template parameter list.
We wer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89855
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> DR 456: PR6257
That's what established the status quo, which James referred to as "While
may or may not declare functions in ::std::, and may or may
not decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89858
Bug ID: 89858
Summary: crash with libmpfr.so.6
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89859
Bug ID: 89859
Summary: Addition of __restrict generates worse assembly
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Darwin: Profile guided |Darwin: PGO + LTO +
|opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89858
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89859
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89859
--- Comment #2 from John Boyer ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> _ZN4test7computeEPi.isra.0: // non-restrict
> .LFB2:
> .cfi_startproc
> ldr x3, [x0]
> mov w4, 99
> ldr w2, [x0, 8]
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89858
--- Comment #2 from Hans Buchmann ---
Source from:
MPFR Version 4.0.1 from https://www.mpfr.org
made with:
TC=where to install
${MPFR_SRC}/configure \
--prefix=${TC} \
--with-gmp=${TC}
#
${MAKE}
${MAKE} install
A fake link:
libmpfr.so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89859
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to John Boyer from comment #2)
> Hey, what did you use to obtain that assembly? Also, is there anyway to
> display this in godbolt instead of the CISC notion?
I have my own toolchain.
But godbolt h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #16 from Daniel Vollmer ---
Created attachment 46038
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46038&action=edit
reproducer for threading issue -fprofile-generate
The attached example (see comments for command-lines) yield
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89859
--- Comment #4 from John Boyer ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to John Boyer from comment #2)
> > Hey, what did you use to obtain that assembly? Also, is there anyway to
> > display this in godbolt instead of the CISC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89827
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Mar 27 19:14:35 2019
New Revision: 269975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269975&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89827
* config/i386/i386.c (dimode_scala
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89859
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to John Boyer from comment #4)
> I see. Would you recommend using ARM for comparisons between different
> assembly outputs to gauge which does more work?
It depends. NOTE the output for x86_64 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89827
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89421
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89831
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Daniel Vollmer from comment #16)
> Created attachment 46038 [details]
> reproducer for threading issue -fprofile-generate
>
> The attached example (see comments for command-lines) yields the foll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Vollmer ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #17)
> hmm. this one is not repeating for me - please can you tell me:
> OS version and the svn rev (or GIT sha1) for the version of 7 branch that
> you're using?
> (I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89860
Bug ID: 89860
Summary: liboffloadmic/runtime/offload_target.cpp:332]: (style)
Array index 'i' is used before limits check.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Daniel Vollmer from comment #18)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #17)
> > hmm. this one is not repeating for me - please can you tell me:
> > OS version and the svn rev (or GIT sha1) for t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89852
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
struct A {
int b;
};
struct B {
A g;
};
const auto j = A{};
template
void k()
{
B{j};
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89831
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 27 20:39:19 2019
New Revision: 269977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/89831 - error with qualified-id in const member function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89831
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] passing|[8 Regression] passing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89744
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89834
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Sorry, failed to format the checkin correctly:
2019-03-27 Bill Schmidt
PR testsuite/89834
* gcc.dg/vect/pr81740-2.c: Require vect_hw_misalign.
Committed as r269978.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89834
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81740
Bug 81740 depends on bug 89834, which changed state.
Bug 89834 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr81740-2.c introduced in r269938
fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89834
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #15)
> Based on c#14 this seems most likely like a Fortran FE issue, right?
Certainly looks like it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #20 from Daniel Vollmer ---
Interesting. The gcc-7.4.0 was the bottled (precompiled) version from homebrew,
generated on Dec 7th 2018, so I assume it must've been built on 10.14.1 or
10.14.2.
I rebuilt 7.4.0 locally just now (so in 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89861
Bug ID: 89861
Summary: g++-8: error: unrecognized command line option
‘-fsanitize’
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Mar 27 21:17:48 2019
New Revision: 269979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85667
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_functio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89853
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
I don't have access to that type of machine and honestly don't know the ISA
well enough to know the differences between what runs well and what doesn't
just by looking at the code. Can you point out some cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88521
Bug 88521 depends on bug 85667, which changed state.
Bug 85667 Summary: ms_abi rules aren't followed when returning short structs
with float values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #22 from Daniel Vollmer ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #21)
> > I rebuilt 7.4.0 locally just now (so in 10.14.4), and now I can no longer
> > reproduce the problem. I'm not sure what could cause the difference,
> > though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Daniel Vollmer from comment #22)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #21)
> I've tried this same reproducer using g++-8.3.0, also pre-built (bottled) by
> homebrew, on darwin18.2.0 (so the sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
--- Comment #22 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Mar 27 22:40:22 2019
New Revision: 269980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR 85537
2019-03-27 Janus Weil
PR fortran/8553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 85537, which changed state.
Bug 85537 Summary: [F08] Invalid memory reference at runtime when calling
subroutine through procedure pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89854
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89862
Bug ID: 89862
Summary: LTO bootstrap fails for ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89854
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89854
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84898
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40789
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88834
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7)
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> (In reply to kugan from comment #6)
> > cmp w3, 0
> > ble .L1
> > sub w3, w3, #1
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88834
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45686|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug ID: 89863
Summary: [meta-bug] Issues that cppcheck finds that gcc misses
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, meta-bug
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33715
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > I would like to have a warning in C++ that warns about local variables
> > assigned
> > via operator new or operator new[], but th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70800
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79364
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70361
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61339
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79022
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85910
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85968
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83822
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89863
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
