https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 3 09:04:23 2019
New Revision: 269349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87689
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
--- Comment #28 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 3 09:20:09 2019
New Revision: 269350
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269350&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87689
Backport from tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-03/msg7.html and it has been
approved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44471
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89174
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 3 10:09:32 2019
New Revision: 269351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/89174
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89174
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89462
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
red with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc --with-languages='c
c++' --disable-multilib : (reconfigured) ../gcc-trunk/configure
--prefix=/opt/gcc --with-languages='c c++' --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.1 20190303 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89566
Bug ID: 89566
Summary: ICE on compilable C++ code: in gimple_call_arg, at
gimple.h:3166
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I still see
...
_hugearray.3858:
.long 42
.long 42
.long 42
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77908
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 3 13:16:40 2019
New Revision: 269352
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269352&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/72714
* resolve.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] |[7/8 Regression] [Coarray]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
> So the line
>
>allocate (z(2)[:3,*])
>
> is in fact valid.
Actually, it is not (just so that nobody gets confused :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #32 from T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #16 from Piotr Kubaj ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #15)
> I committed a patch that should fix the nanotime problem.
>
> Some of the other issues you describe will most likely require a fix in the
> libgo/mkrsysinfo.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #17 from Piotr Kubaj ---
Since you mentioned libgo/runtime_sysinfo.go, I also had a look there and saw
that umtx_time is already present there:
type __umtx_time struct { _timeout timespec; _flags uint32; _clockid uint32; }
const _size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #33 from Thomas Koenig ---
A much cleaner patch which gets us to the wrong code:
Index: trans-expr.c
===
--- trans-expr.c(Revision 269260)
+++ trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567
Bug ID: 89567
Summary: [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing
unused struct parameter members
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #34
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sun Mar 3 20:24:53 2019
New Revision: 269353
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269353&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf
Steven G. Kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sun Mar 3 20:30:44 2019
New Revision: 269354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269354&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf
Steven G. Kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sun Mar 3 20:36:12 2019
New Revision: 269355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf
Steven G. Kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76577
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77908
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Array operation fails for |Array operation fails for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89492
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237
Bug 31237 depends on bug 89492, which changed state.
Bug 89492 Summary: [9 Regression] Endless compilation of an invalid TRANSFER
after r269177
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89492
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237
Bug 31237 depends on bug 89516, which changed state.
Bug 89516 Summary: ICE in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes at
gcc/fortran/check.c:5506
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61112
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 61112, which changed state.
Bug 61112 Summary: Simple example triggers false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized
warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61112
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31873
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32392
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> That said, there is a whole bunch of applications that would kill for
> >> -mrecip,
> > even for 11bit ones. Games are one of them, fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Given that 7.5 will be the final 7-release, I find it too risky to
> introduce potential new regressions. If nobody objects, we might
> close this PR. (Target milestone 8.4?)
Makes sense for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Given that 7.5 will be the final 7-release, I find it too risky to
> introduce potential new regressions. If nobody objects, we might
> close this PR. (Target milestone 8.4?)
Makes sense for me. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is there any plan to back port r268973?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sun Mar 3 22:24:00 2019
New Revision: 269357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269357&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Mar 3 22:23:33 2019
New Revision: 269356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/89562 use binary mode for file I/O
PR libstdc++/895
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237
Bug 31237 depends on bug 88326, which changed state.
Bug 88326 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at
fortran/trans-array.c:6085
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237
Bug 31237 depends on bug 89077, which changed state.
Bug 89077 Summary: ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237
Bug 31237 depends on bug 89266, which changed state.
Bug 89266 Summary: ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 89266, which changed state.
Bug 89266 Summary: ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557
--- Comment #4 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail
dot com> ---
Without the aligned(16) attribute the alignment of the struct in my code is 8
bytes, struct size remains to be 16 bytes:
GCC 8.2.0 generates (-Og, no -ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89568
Bug ID: 89568
Summary: constexpr functions are implicitly noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89482
--- Comment #11 from David ---
(In reply to Ciro Santilli from comment #10)
> If I do start work, I'll ping here to avoid work duplication.
Do. I have some resources I could email you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89487
--- Comment #6 from bin cheng ---
Author: amker
Date: Mon Mar 4 01:38:25 2019
New Revision: 269361
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269361&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89487
* tree-loop-distribution.c (has_non
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89565
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89569
Bug ID: 89569
Summary: line number is not accurate on large file gcc compared
to clang
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54936
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570
Bug ID: 89570
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at
optabs.c:4001
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
:18:26: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at
cp/except.c:1238
18 | decltype (lk (sc ())) zz;
| ^
0x602261 nothrow_spec_p(tree_node const*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.0.0_alpha20190303/work/gcc-9-20190303/gcc/cp/except.c:1238
0x88e2f8 set_fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89533
--- Comment #1 from Alexey Kutumov ---
Hi,
FYI, i`ve filed same bug to clang`s bugzilla:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40896
There is a comment from clang bug:
Richard Smith 2019-03-01 21:13:38 PST
I would consider this to be both a C
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.0.0_alpha20190303/work/gcc-9-20190303/gcc/toplev.c:326
0xe4314d gcond* dyn_cast(gimple*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.0.0_alpha20190303/work/gcc-9-20190303/gcc/is-a.h:224
0xe4314d get_loop_exit_condition(loop const*)
/var/tmp/por
66 matches
Mail list logo
