https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89506
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 2 08:05:10 2019
New Revision: 269339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89506
* config/arm/arm.md (cmpsi2_addneg): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71446
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 2 08:06:57 2019
New Revision: 269340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71446
* cp-tree.h (CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89506
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86215
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to simon from comment #1)
Same results with gcc version 9.0.1 20190219 (experimental) (GCC)
on Darwin 18.2.0.
$ otool -L a.out
a.out:
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88337
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86979
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Full test completed, the PR is fixed without regression. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87751
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #12 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4210
--- Comment #30 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
At the point where the then block starts being processed (and, thus,
warnings may be given) it wouldn't be known whether there are labels in
there or not; cf. the discussion in bug 68193 re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89555
Bug ID: 89555
Summary: Unable to resolve masking of a type with a local
variable of the same name
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89556
Bug ID: 89556
Summary: error when using "with Priority"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557
Bug ID: 89557
Summary: [7/8 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance
regression on znver1
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89558
Bug ID: 89558
Summary: Recects missing lower bound expression in
allocate-shape-spec-list
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89558
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Same language for F03 and F08, too lazy to look further back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
--- Comment #13 from Harald Anlauf ---
On 03/02/19 12:48, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
>
> Dominique d'Humieres changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The patch turned out to require a small adjustment for scalar MOLD
> of size 0, so I posted it for review:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-02/msg00237.html
The patch works as expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89559
Bug ID: 89559
Summary: Setting the sticky revision in SVN read-only view
results in an error when a space is added
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sat Mar 2 15:29:27 2019
New Revision: 269341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/89516
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65403
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Alex Henrie from comment #8)
> Why weren't Manuel's patches accepted?
I never properly submitted them. Feel free to adopt them and get them through
the process:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019
New Revision: 269342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019
New Revision: 269342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89492
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019
New Revision: 269342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019
New Revision: 269342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
Bug ID: 89560
Summary: [9 regression] ICE In function 'rtx_def*
gen_vec_extract_lo_v64qi(rtx, rtx)'
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r269158 PASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89558
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89555
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89558
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89558
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71446
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45872
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45872&action=edit
gcc9-pr71446-2.patch
Untested patch for the build_aggr_conv stuff.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> Is it fixed?
I should backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557
--- Comment #3 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail
dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> -Og is not meant to generate code with good performance, but code which is
> easy to debug, so benchmarking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> What does your -mtune=native expand to?
How I can see it?
> Can you reproduce also without say --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none?
Yes, I'll rebuild witho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
E.g.
gcc -v -mtune=native -xc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89177
--- Comment #7 from jpfau at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jpfau
Date: Sat Mar 2 19:14:54 2019
New Revision: 269343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR d/89177 - Fix unaligned access in std.digest.murmurhash
libp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> E.g.
> gcc -v -mtune=native -xc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1
SkyLake
cc -v -mtune=native -xc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1
/usr/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561
Bug ID: 89561
Summary: feature request: undefined behaviour configuration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-fsantize=undefined does exactly what 6ou want.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 45873
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45873&action=edit
Patch
This patch fixes the tests that need to link against libatomic on hppa.
We need to add path to libat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561
--- Comment #2 from bugsthecode at mail dot ru ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> -fsantize=undefined does exactly what 6ou want.
No, -fsanitize=undefined adds code to detect and report UB at runtime. In
mentioned bugs gcc generate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89554
--- Comment #1 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Another weird report:
Building CXX object lib/Lex/CMakeFiles/clangLex.dir/PPMacroExpansion.cpp.o
In file included from
/home/xbolva00/LLVM/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/SourceManager.h:37:0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
PASS
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --enable-checking=yes
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --disable-multilib --with-tune=native
FAIL
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --enable-checking=yes,df
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
Bug ID: 89562
Summary: std::filesystem::copy truncates files before byte with
value 0x1A
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
--- Comment #1 from Rodrigo Coimbra ---
Created attachment 45875
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45875&action=edit
JPEG file 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
--- Comment #2 from Rodrigo Coimbra ---
Created attachment 45876
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45876&action=edit
JPEG file 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, reproduced. Will debug on Monday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89562
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
std::filesystem isn't expected to work on Windows until gcc 9:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/changes.html#libstdcxx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 2 23:21:11 2019
New Revision: 269344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-02 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/89020
* io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89546
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Right, I must have been looking at output of a patched compiler. Anyway, I
believe I tracked it down to a bug in how SRA propagates write flag (since
r247604). In one specific case, an access structure is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17426
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21549
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24729
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13756
--- Comment #17 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #8)
> > > tree-ssa documentation still missing after the mainline mer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89563
Bug ID: 89563
Summary: decltype resolution doesn't terminate recursion
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89564
Bug ID: 89564
Summary: decltype resolution ignores SFINAE
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 3 05:10:14 2019
New Revision: 269348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-02 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
67 matches
Mail list logo