https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89383
Bug ID: 89383
Summary: [9 Regression] libcpp/line-map.c:748:15: runtime
error: shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type
'unsigned int'
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89383
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364
--- Comment #2 from Bader at lrz dot de ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Why do you want the shape to be [4,-1]?
The Fortran 2018 standard explicitly prescribes this in 16.9.172, para 5.
Regards
Reinhold
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89306
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Feb 18 08:21:23 2019
New Revision: 268979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Come up with fast {function,call}_summary classes (PR ipa/89306).
2019-02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89306
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87295
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87295
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
> GDB PR is now https://sourceware.org/bugzil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89292
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89384
Bug ID: 89384
Summary: CONTIGUOUS dummy argument in BIND(C) interface
incorrect when actual is non-contiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89209
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Feb 18 08:59:04 2019
New Revision: 268980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 89209] Avoid segfault in a peculiar corner case in SRA
2019-02-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89209
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89307
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, use of TLS has
* size of counters overhead (one could use char sized TLS counters and
update the global ones with locking on overflow)
* tear-down/build-up cost at thread termination/creation
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89313
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89385
Bug ID: 89385
Summary: Incorrect members of C descriptor for an allocatable
object
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89324
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89385
--- Comment #1 from Bader at lrz dot de ---
Further comment: Analogous failures also happen for descriptors of
assumed-shape or POINTER objects. I suggest that I re-test these when this bug
is fixed and submit a separate report if still necessary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89009
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89327
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, all of them look to miss RejectNegative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89384
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89335
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Rafael Avila de Espindola from comment #10)
> Maybe we should have a general flag that disables all warnings where gcc
> cannot prove that there is a path from a function entry to the broken
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89340
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89383
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Feb 18 09:46:19 2019
New Revision: 268981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use 1UL constant in order to not overflow (PR c++/89383).
2019-02-18 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89383
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390*-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89362
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89370
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89177
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Have started a test on my ARM hardware, it will take a few days to run the
complete test suite.
BTW: I also have an issue with the install script of libphobos:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/ms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80438
Ed Catmur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed at catmur dot uk
--- Comment #2 from Ed C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89386
Bug ID: 89386
Summary: Generation of vectorized MULHRS (Multiply High with
Round and Scale) instruction
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89361
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 18 11:16:33 2019
New Revision: 268983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89361
* config/s390/s390.c (s390_indirect_branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89369
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 18 11:20:43 2019
New Revision: 268984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268984&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89369
* config/s390/s390.md (*rsbg__srl_bitmask,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89361
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] s390 |[7/8 Regression] s390
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89369
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86964
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 45748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45748&action=edit
patch
Thanks for working on this. For
extern float x;
void foo()
{
}
I still see the basetype DIE for floa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89387
Bug ID: 89387
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in maybe_generic_this_capture at
gcc/cp/lambda.c:945 since r268851
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89387
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714
--- Comment #45 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 18 12:52:36 2019
New Revision: 268985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/88714
* config/arm/arm.md (*arm_movdi, *movd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89296
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 18 12:56:15 2019
New Revision: 268986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/89296
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82380
Avi Kivity changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@cloudius-systems.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89388
Bug ID: 89388
Summary: Component selection for assumed-size DT array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89387
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat ice.ii
template class a> class b {
using c = int;
using f = a;
f::d;
void e() {
[&] { d(); };
}
void d();
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89324
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Malcomson ---
There were similar problems in handling the stack pointer with subs/adds
instructions elsewhere in the aarch64 backend.
Patch proposed & being worked on here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80871
--- Comment #3 from Ed Catmur ---
Sorry. See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80438
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80871
Ed Catmur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed at catmur dot uk
--- Comment #2 from Ed C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89388
--- Comment #1 from Bader at lrz dot de ---
Actually, C1002 applies for expressions, which is not relevant for this case
... the only (non-constraint) restriction that one could (indirectly) argue to
apply is
9.5.2 para2, inasmuch as the shape i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Drobyshev ---
Created attachment 45751
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45751&action=edit
Work-in-progress fix
This patch is pretty raw. It only handles .data, .rodata and .bss.
It does not handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Drobyshev ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrey Drobyshev from comment #8)
>
> Great you've been working on that Andrey.
>
> > I recently started to work on this issue as well. I manage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89373
--- Comment #4 from mdblack98 at yahoo dot com ---
FYI...the variadic macro __VA_ARGS__ did solve the braced items problem on
array initialization in nested macros. Just have to move the argument to the
end of the macro...
Thanks
Mike
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89389
Bug ID: 89389
Summary: inlining failed in call to always_inline -- removing
attribute leaves function inlined
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89294
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Feb 18 16:31:17 2019
New Revision: 268990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89294 - ICE in valid_constant_size_p
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89294
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89367
--- Comment #6 from Frank Secilia ---
I can't find anything in the standard under `constant expressions` or
`converted constant expressions` that explicitly allows non-null
pointer-to-member-functions in constexpr contexts, but I also can't find
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89367
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If the compiler can prove the addresses are the same or are different, then
sure, it will evaluate to constant 0 or 1. The question is if the compiler
must be able to prove it in all cases (which is impossib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89362
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82380
--- Comment #2 from Casey Carter ---
You can work around this bug by using a trailing requires-clause instead of
putting the requires-clause in the template-head.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Note configuring for mips-linux will show the octeon-exts failures.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
--- Comment #25 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 18 18:28:58 2019
New Revision: 268992
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268992&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-18 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87689
* trans-decl.c (g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89390
Bug ID: 89390
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in get_string, at
spellcheck-tree.h:46
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89391
Bug ID: 89391
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in build_target_expr_with_type, at
cp/tree.c:795
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89392
Bug ID: 89392
Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in bitmap_bit_p, at
bitmap.c:978
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89285
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45752
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45752&action=edit
gcc9-pr89285.patch
Updated untested patch for the constexpr evaluation on pre-folding trees.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed on gcc 9 so far. I will backport this to the other
open branches, but only after the release of the next
version of gcc 8.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89390
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89390
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89391
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89392
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89391
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45754&action=edit
gcc9-pr89391.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89384
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89387
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45755
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45755&action=edit
gcc9-pr89387.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89393
Bug ID: 89393
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/ref-temp1.C
-std=c++14 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\t]_?_ZGR1bIvE
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89384
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
This simple (too simple?) patch seems to fix things:
Index: trans-expr.c
===
--- trans-expr.c(Revision 268992)
+++ trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89357
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |c++
--- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88127
--- Comment #3 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Mon Feb 18 23:29:39 2019
New Revision: 268999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libphobos: Detect if qsort_r is available
Merges upstream d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88127
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
octeon-exts-3 can be fixed with a relatively simple pattern in mips.md or with
a bit of code in combine.c.
fix-r4000-10.c is more interesting. Hard register propagation does its thing
and exposes a bit of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89336
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 19 01:01:50 2019
New Revision: 269003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/89336 - multiple stores in constexpr stmt.
If we evaluate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
One of the approaches we have been discussing is replacing these invalid calls
with __builtin_trap or __builtin_unreachable, perhaps optionally preceded by
__builtin_warning ("specified size exceeds maximum o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89344
--- Comment #5 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
That was fast. Thanks!
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
