https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87149
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 14 19:03:54 2019
New Revision: 268890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268890&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2018-08-31 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> My reproducer described in the first comment was:
> 1) build gcc trunk w/o bootstrap and install it
> 2) use the compiler and build gcc-8 branch w/o bootstrap
> 3) Ada FE is successfully built, but Ada runt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89352
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 89352, which changed state.
Bug 89352 Summary: Deferred length character array pointer error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89352
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clange001 at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88892
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I backported it anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Thu Feb 14 20:24:54 2019
New Revision: 268895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268895&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-14 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/88248
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
--- Comment #9 from Harald Anlauf ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358
Bug ID: 89358
Summary: Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR
warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89321
--- Comment #7 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Feb 14 21:07:13 2019
New Revision: 268904
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268904&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/89321
compiler: copy has_padding field from conve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89321
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Feb 14 21:33:29 2019
New Revision: 268906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268906&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 81552 Improve and document -flag-init-integer
Make the option handling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #16 from Harald Anlauf ---
Regarding the unwanted padding with \0, the following patch seems to
solve the issue with transfer.
Index: decl.c
===
--- decl.c (revisio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835
--- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #8)
> The patch I posted for the related pr88993 also relaxes this warning for
> printf and fprintf: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00224.html
>
> Like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 22:57:34 2019
New Revision: 268908
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't offer suggestions for compiler-generated variables (PR c++/85515)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
The warning is very simple: it just looks for excessive sizes in calls emitted
in the optimized IL. When the call is there (either because it's in the source
code as is or because it's been synthesized by GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:02:45 2019
New Revision: 268909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: don't offer bogus "._0" suggestions (PR c++/86329)
PR c++/86329 r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:10:47 2019
New Revision: 268913
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268913&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89354
* combine.c (make_extraction): P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:12:26 2019
New Revision: 268914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268914&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89354
* combine.c (make_extraction): P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88795
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:14:56 2019
New Revision: 268915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE on class-template argument deduction (PR c++/88795)
PR c++/887
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:17:51 2019
New Revision: 268916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++ concepts: fix ICE with requires on dtors (PR c++/89036)
PR c++/890
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 89036, which changed state.
Bug 89036 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE if destructor has a requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70090
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Micay ---
This has now been implemented in Clang as __builtin_dynamic_object_size.
There's a thread on the GCC mailing list about it at
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/msg87230.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
The -Wstringop-overflow warning is a consequence of pointer offsets being
treated as unsigned integers, argc being signed, and the object size
computation returning scalars rather than ranges. In the first te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89356
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
A similar testcase
template auto fn () -> decltype(unsigned{0} + T(1));
auto e = fn();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
I've built the top of binutils-gdb with the patch referenced in comment #8
applied and with -Wformat-overflow=2 and -Wformat-truncation=2 and got the
following breakdown:
DiagnosticCo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Ah, but you mentioned elfutilts, not binutils. I've now downloaded and built
elfutils-0.175. It took a bit more effort because --disable-werror doesn't
work there but once I got past that I just got the thr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89168
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Feb 15 00:36:50 2019
New Revision: 268922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/89168
libgo: change gotest to run examples with o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #11)
> Ah, but you mentioned elfutilts, not binutils. I've now downloaded and
> built elfutils-0.175. It took a bit more effort because --disable-werror
> doesn't wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89168
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #13 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89356
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
That revision also changes mangling of fn from
decltype (unsigned short{2u}+((int)(3))) fn()
to
decltype ((2u)+((int)(3))) fn()
template
auto fn () -> decltype(unsigned{2u} + (T)3) { return 42; }
template a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89356
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
reshape_init turns {NON_LVALUE_EXPR <2>} into NON_LVALUE_EXPR <2> and then the
mangled name misses "tlE".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
There's probably a lot more bugs that should fall under this meta-bug than
currently do; I'll leave finding them all for another day though (or for
someone else to do)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
>
> The test case makes the tacit assumption that argc is necessarily
> non-negative. That makes sense for the argc argument to main but not in
> other situations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89342
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 15 07:17:24 2019
New Revision: 268924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268924&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/89342
* optc-save-gen.awk: Handle optimize_fast l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89342
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 15 07:36:23 2019
New Revision: 268925
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268925&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/89342
* optc-save-gen.awk: Handle optimize_fast l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89340
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 15 07:38:09 2019
New Revision: 268926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/89340
* c-decl.c (start_function): Clear TREE_PUBLIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89278
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 15 07:39:45 2019
New Revision: 268927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268927&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89278
* tree-loop-distribution.c: Inc
; .p2align 4,,10
> .p2align 3
> .L3:
> .L2:
> endbr64 <<< Why is ENDBR here? There is no indirect branch.
> movl$22, %eax
> ret
> .cfi_endproc
> .LFE0:
> .size test, .-test
> .ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.
; .p2align 4,,10
> .p2align 3
> .L3:
> .L2:
> endbr64 <<< Why is ENDBR here? There is no indirect branch.
> movl$22, %eax
> ret
> .cfi_endproc
> .LFE0:
> .size test, .-test
> .ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89278
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 15 07:50:26 2019
New Revision: 268928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89278
* tree-loop-distribution.c: Inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69006
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 15 07:52:50 2019
New Revision: 268930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/69006
PR testsuite/88920
* lib/gcc-dg.exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88920
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 15 07:52:50 2019
New Revision: 268930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/69006
PR testsuite/88920
* lib/gcc-dg.ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88920
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89278
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] Combine |[7 Regression] Combine pass
101 - 155 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
