https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89340
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89314
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 14 09:25:01 2019
New Revision: 268868
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268868&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89314
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89303
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Feb 14 09:40:02 2019
New Revision: 268869
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268869&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89303 add testcase for std::enable_shared_from_this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45554|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45604|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45556|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
A job for phiopt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89314
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 14 10:04:35 2019
New Revision: 268870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89314
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.2.1, 9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89348
Bug ID: 89348
Summary: Fortran Command Options documentation fixes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89348
--- Comment #1 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45715&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
Date has been omitted from change log. Can be added when committed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349
Bug ID: 89349
Summary: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous
memory access when building GCC 8 branch with GCC
master
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I forgot to mention that the make is done on gcc-8 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89284
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant ---
Fantastic! Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89284
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 89284, which changed state.
Bug 89284 Summary: gcc -fsanitize=undefined inhibits -Wuninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89284
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350
Bug ID: 89350
Summary: [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning
since r261518
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89278
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45716
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45716&action=edit
gcc9-pr89278.patch
Well, if you want to be beaten in that, here is a patch. I've changed only the
spots I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89009
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Feb 14 11:24:45 2019
New Revision: 268871
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r268762
2019-02-14 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88858
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Feb 14 11:25:18 2019
New Revision: 268872
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268872&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r268835
2019-02-14 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Feb 14 11:30:58 2019
New Revision: 268873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268873&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Call free_dominance_info when transformed in DCE (PR rtl-optimization/8924
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 89283 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89303
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Feb 14 11:53:57 2019
New Revision: 268874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89303 add testcase for std::enable_shared_from_this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89278
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89278
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 45716
> --> https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89342
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45717
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45717&action=edit
gcc9-pr89342.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is that r8 () is a source of abnormal edges which makes the abnormal
dispatcher reachable. I think the testcase becomes clearer when one uses
setjmp instead of vfork since I'm not sure why we have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89306
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 45718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45718&action=edit
Tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89306
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 45719
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45719&action=edit
libxul.so WPA (--enable-checking=release) before patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is that it might be still reachable through both normal and
abnormal edges during cfg and might become unreachable only later (e.g.
inlining or whatever other opt), so we need something that will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89306
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 45720
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45720&action=edit
libxul.so WPA (--enable-checking=release) after patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89306
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89306
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Having all *.o files in RAM, I see time change for WPA from 93.0 to 90.0s.
So relatively small improvement.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89307
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Created attachment 45703 [details]
> patch for tls counters (incomplete - no runtime bits)
Isn't the patch only a refactoring that is eliminating tls_model from
tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|https://gcc.gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89340
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45721
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45721&action=edit
gcc9-pr89340.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89307
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I'm just looking at the google/gcc-4.9 branch:
https://android.googlesource.com/toolchain/gcc/+/master/gcc-4.9/
and they have a sampling approach:
/* Transform:
ORIGINAL CODE
Into:
__gcov_sample_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89307
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
>
> which effectively updates edge counters just for a limited time. I would
> expect
Ah now, it's really doing sampling. I guess it can lead to quite some profile
inconsistencies..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
/xgcc
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-lto
--disable-bootstrap : (reconfigured) ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.1 20190214 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89352
Bug ID: 89352
Summary: Deferred length character array pointer error with
gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
;<<< This should be there.
movl$22, %eax
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size test, .-test
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.1 20190214 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
.section.note.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89353
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> [hjl@gnu-mic-2 gcc]$ cat x.c
> .L2:
> endbr32 This should be there.
This should NOT be there.
> movl$22, %eax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89351
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Feb 14 13:57:52 2019
New Revision: 268876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r268873
2019-02-14 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
Bug ID: 89354
Summary: Combine pass yields wrong code with -O2 and -msse2 for
32bit target
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72715
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code, openmp |openacc
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89307
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Ah now, it's really doing sampling. I guess it can lead to quite some profile
> inconsistencies..
Yep, it is not coolest solution. I would not worry too much about
precision loss unless you get some weird int
; Why is ENDBR here? There is no indirect branch.
movl$22, %eax
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size test, .-test
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.1 20190214 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
.section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 14 14:49:03 2019
New Revision: 268880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/88677
Fix PR number.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-mno-stv also cures it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89356
Bug ID: 89356
Summary: [9 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: mangling
implicit_conv_expr in nodejs8 package since r268321
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89356
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
The -Wattributes warning would be emitted here in cgraphunit.c:
process_function_and_variable_attributes:
777 if (lookup_attribute ("weakref", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl))
778 && (node->de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89356
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89356
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Both decls of "foo" are using the same FUNCTION_DECL.
node->alias is set in varasm.c: assemble_alias here:
5991cgraph_node::get_create (decl)->alias = true;
when processing the second decl of "foo"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89335
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||87089
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89357
Bug ID: 89357
Summary: alignas for automatic variables with alignment greater
than 16 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89354
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45724
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45724&action=edit
gcc9-pr89354.patch
Untested fix. I think the bug is in make_extraction, which for VOIDmode,
(mem:DI ...), 0, N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89308
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 45725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45725&action=edit
Patch to disable ALSR for asan/tsan on powerpc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89308
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The above patch pulls in just enough of the changes from trunk to disable ASLR
for powerpc64 while leaving things alone for everyone else.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89308
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ugh, does this mean if ASLR is enabled you get
"WARNING: Program is being run with address space layout "
"randomization (ASLR) enabled which prevents the thread and "
"memory sanitizers from working on power
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89308
--- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think it only comes out if you specify the verbose sanitizer option on the
compilation. If I can remember how to specify that I will try it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88850
--- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Thu Feb 14 17:17:20 2019
New Revision: 268884
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268884&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Arm: Add HF modes to ANY iterators
The iterator ANY64 are used in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89308
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Still, a reexec is costly and might break some programs. If the ASLR makes
problems only sometimes, it might be better to try to map stuff it wants and if
that fails, before reporting failure try this CheckA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Let me see if I can add the respective usefulness test to the code
> deciding to speculate.
I see, it is mine, sorry for blaming you :)
One alternative would be also to put the indirect part of pseculative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337
Rafael Avila de Espindola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45710|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89308
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is the way it came from upstream (llvm) and the solution for powerpc64 was
copied from what aarch64 did before.
What is really needed is a workable solution from whoever does sanitizer
develo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 89337, which changed state.
Bug 89337 Summary: Bogus "exceeds maximum object size" on unreachable code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337
Rafael Avila de Espindola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Feb 14 17:47:49 2019
New Revision: 268886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Provide __start_minfo/__stop_minfo for linkers that don't (PR d/87864)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89352
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> I thought that typically you can't build older gcc with newer gcc when using
> ada, at least I remember seeing issues with gcc 7 built with gcc 8 too when
> ada is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2)
> What happens without --disable-bootstrap?
My reproducer described in the first comment was:
1) build gcc trunk w/o bootstrap and install it
2) use the compiler an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89313
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
I'm testing a patch that gives a better error message and eliminates the ICE:
[bergner@dagger1 PR89313]$ cat pr89313.i
long f;
long g (void)
{
register long z asm ("rax");
asm ("foo %0, %1, %2" : "=&r"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 14 18:46:18 2019
New Revision: 26
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=26&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2018-07-26 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88145
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88892
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 14 18:57:54 2019
New Revision: 268889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268889&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2019-01-18 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86684
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 14 19:03:54 2019
New Revision: 268890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268890&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2018-08-31 Segher Boessenkool
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
