https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 08:18:09 2019
New Revision: 268666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/89223
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89243
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89246
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85899
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88993
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Shubham Narlawar from comment #5)
> I got an ICE as below on gcc-8.2 at optimization -O3 as below-
>
> internal compiler error: in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2409
>
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Bug ID: 89247
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at
internal-fn.c:2409
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88977
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85596
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Feb 8 09:05:40 2019
New Revision: 268667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85596 Add --with-multilib-list doc for aarch64
2019-02-08 Ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89248
Bug ID: 89248
Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at
internal-fn.c:2409
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-2-8
Summary|[8 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581
--- Comment #10 from Shubham Narlawar ---
I have opened a new bug report for above. Here is the link.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89248
I attached the preprocessed code of the original program in the report.
On Fri, Feb 8, 201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gsocshubham at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89248
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581
--- Comment #11 from Shubham Narlawar ---
Is it ok if I send .c extension file as an attachment?
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:42 PM wrote:
> Attachments with a MIME type of "text/html" are not allowed on this
> installation.
>
> Shubham Narlawar w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
A reduced testcase was
a;
b() {
void *c = &&d;
for (;;)
d:
if (a)
;
else
a = ({ 0 < b; });
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Confirmed. I wonder what that source is autogenerated from/for ;)
It's created with csmith.
>
> Btw, I can't reproduce on the GCC 7 branch.
I can with:
$ gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85596
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|7.3.1 |
Summary|[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89249
Bug ID: 89249
Summary: mingw, paths with space, LTO -> collect2.exe: fatal
error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
Bug ID: 89250
Summary: [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-24.c XPASSes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85947
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
Bug ID: 89251
Summary: [2018-q4m] Wrong datatype optimization on bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89249
--- Comment #1 from Liviu Ionescu ---
possibly related:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89066
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78063
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85947
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89244
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Well we do document some of them:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html
I'm fine not doing so though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 8 10:26:33 2019
New Revision: 268669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89234
* except.c (copy_reg_eh_region_n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
I think this is a duplicate of that other bug, at least I seem to remember
seeing this:
[local count: 536817226]:
# prephitmp_12 = PHI <1(15)>
if (prephitmp_12 != 0)
goto ; [50.00%]
else
goto ; [50.00%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 8 10:37:15 2019
New Revision: 268670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268670&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-06-11 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89243
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The other change is r263511.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87653
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89139
--- Comment #5 from Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen ---
Here is a much simpler example, which exhibits the same behavior:
static void c (void (*w) (void))
{
w ();
}
static void f ()
{
}
static void *x = &f;
void g ()
{
c (x);
}
The compiler o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Feb 8 11:30:53 2019
New Revision: 268678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Use OI/TImode in *mov[ot]i_internal_avx with AVX512VL
OImode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #25)
> you might consider adding something like that to your patch:
>
> Index: elf.h
> ===
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89139
--- Comment #6 from Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen ---
Interestingly, the above code, slightly modified, exhibits another problem the
optimizer has:
void foo ();
static void c (void (*w) (void))
{
w ();
}
static void f ()
{
foo ();
}
static v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Is this fixed on trunk now?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89250
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 11:56:28 2019
New Revision: 268680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/89250
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw
Component|other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Or fold LOOP_VECTORIZED into 0 in fold_builtins pass just in case something
> makes it through?
> Could fix PR87446 too.
Yeah, though the whole point was to see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> /* Clobber all memory and addressable symbols for asm ("" : : : "memory");
> */
> if (gimple_asm_clobbers_memory_p (stmt))
> add_virtual_operand (fn, s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89009
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate for it, will send it on Monday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86595
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 12:20:12 2019
New Revision: 268683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86595 add missing noexcept
Backport from mainline
2018-07-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87846
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 12:20:22 2019
New Revision: 268685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86910 fix filesystem::create_directories
Implement the prop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89117
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 12:20:03 2019
New Revision: 268681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/89117 backport path::replace_extension("") fix
Although the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86910
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 12:20:22 2019
New Revision: 268685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86910 fix filesystem::create_directories
Implement the pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |10.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #2 from Kochise ---
You really considered to tag this issue as RESOLVED INVALID with this "trick" ?
I showed you that just stuffing the uint32_t with unused bits change the
behavior, this is clearly a bug. You cannot be serious. Come
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> > /* Clobber all memory and addressable symbols for asm ("" : : : "memory");
> > */
> > if (gimple_asm_clob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87846
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86595
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86910
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89252
Bug ID: 89252
Summary: Vector load/store aren't used to initialize large
memory
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is not a trick. If you have a hardware register that can be accessed only
in certain way, volatile is what should be used, gcc then has
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields option (which defaults to true on arm/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84568
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89221
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78975
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
--- Comment #5 from pere at hungry dot com ---
Thank you for the explanation. It is a lot clearer to me now.
One thing confuses me, though. If is not acceptable in C++,
why is there no warning from the compiler when it is included, instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 12:38:42 2019
New Revision: 268687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268687&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83511 add default argument to basic_string_view::substr
Bac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88084
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 12:38:35 2019
New Revision: 268686
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268686&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/88084 - Implement LWG 2777
Backport from mainline
2018-11-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89253
Bug ID: 89253
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in split_loop, at
tree-ssa-loop-split.c:566
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88084
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89252
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89254
Bug ID: 89254
Summary: std.net.curl and std.parallelism unittests hang
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89254
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #4 from Kochise ---
The pointer I access is volatile, not the uint32_t behind. Why would I ? The
'volatile' keyword has no meaning to change the data size being processed, only
removing the caching behavior of the compiler.
If the co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89249
--- Comment #3 from Liviu Ionescu ---
Hi Richard,
Thank you for taking the time to investigate.
Indeed, COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER is escaped, while COMPILER_PATH is not:
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=c:/users/ilg/desktop/8.2.1\ \ \ \ \
1.4-20190207-1853/bin/.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89252
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 45643
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45643&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 13:21:36 2019
New Revision: 268689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/89247
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
