https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89193
Bug ID: 89193
Summary: "make distclean" leaves stuff in gotools/
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #28 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Feb 4 16:47:12 2019
New Revision: 268523
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268523&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-04 Bill Schmidt
PR target/87064
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #29 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Feb 4 16:48:30 2019
New Revision: 268524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-04 Bill Schmidt
PR target/87064
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89164
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87887
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89194
Bug ID: 89194
Summary: [9 regression] build failure with libstdc++ with
std=c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89194
--- Comment #1 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 45600
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45600&action=edit
ii generated with -std=c++2a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195
Bug ID: 89195
Summary: [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after
combine
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89196
Bug ID: 89196
Summary: clock::to_time_t(ftime)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195
--- Comment #1 from Wilco ---
make_extraction does:
if (MEM_P (inner))
{
poly_int64 offset;
/* POS counts from lsb, but make OFFSET count in memory order. */
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like using mark_lvalue_use instead works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89196
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What options are you using to compile the example code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197
Bug ID: 89197
Summary: Templated Functions const auto assignment causes
internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197
--- Comment #1 from Cameron ---
The foo_fails functions is where the error can be observed. The working
functions are to show behavior with non-templated, and non-deduced types
respectively.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89196
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89198
Bug ID: 89198
Summary: GCC generates/fails to optimize unnecessary sign
extension instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89198
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
--- Comment #1 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197
--- Comment #2 from Cameron ---
Behavior is also similar on 8.1.
All functions build on gcc 7.4.
According to the online compilation found here:
https://godbolt.org/z/MJkd-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89199
Bug ID: 89199
Summary: libgo intermittent testcase failures on ppc64le power9
after r268458
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Mon Feb 4 20:44:22 2019
New Revision: 268525
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-04 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/89077
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf ---
The ICE in comment #0 is fixed on trunk so far.
The ICE is comment #1 is occurring on a different path and is under
further investigation, as well as the other wrong-code issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
Works for
type :: t
integer :: c
end type t
type(t), dimension(5) :: a, b
type(t), dimension(:), allocatable :: c
a = t(1)
b = t(7)
allocate(c(5), source=t(13))
c = plus(c(1), b)
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88937
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
It's clearly wrong to access token->val.node for token->type == CPP_STRING and
token->type == CPP_HEADER_NAME. It's effectively casting the length of the
header name to a (cpp_hashnode *).
For reference, th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89187
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88979
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
And by the same token, I suspect this ought to work too:
template
struct A {
A(T::type);
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200
Bug ID: 89200
Summary: Erroneous copying of a derived type with a
deferred-length character array component
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
--- Comment #3 from Damian Rouson ---
I just created PR89200, on which this meta-bug should depend, but I don't know
how to edit the "Depends on" list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200
--- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson ---
gfortran 8.2.0 code gives the correct output:
$gfortran corrupted-component.f90
$./a.out
12
$gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 8.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88572
--- Comment #14 from Will Wray ---
I intend to submit a patch, or two patches, for these scalar braced init
issues:
Case 1: GCC rejects braced-init of scalars in aggregates. It should accept.
Case 2: GCC accepts empty braced-init of scalars (com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Any plan for back porting? If not, this PR could be closed.
Related to pr89200.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I just created PR89200, on which this meta-bug should depend,
> but I don't know how to edit the "Depends on" list.
You don't have to edit 'Depends on', but you have to mark the new PR (here
89200)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89175
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
See bug 27682.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88937
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|preprocessor|c++
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201
Bug ID: 89201
Summary: Secret/Necessary memset() is Eliminated when Compiling
at -O1/O2/O3 (Insecure Compiler Optimization)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88993
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88993
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89202
Bug ID: 89202
Summary: missing -Wnonnull-dereference or -Wuninitialized for a
certain bug
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18)
> For the record with darwin15 I had to add
>
> /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Headers/
> NSEnumerator.h
> /System/Library/Fra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Feb 5 06:11:25 2019
New Revision: 268529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR87770] test partial specializations for type dependence
When instan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #1)
> len is unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT, so bits_to_bytes_round_down does an unsigned
> division...
That shouldn't make a difference though, both dividend and divisor should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|mikael at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
> warning from the translation unit below. It doesn't seem to correspond to
> the code pointed to in the discussion
> (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11369#issuecomment-453044884):
> the mfree() ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88937
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> Patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00222.html
Thank you David for the patch.
101 - 153 of 153 matches
Mail list logo