https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89079
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||89079
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030
Bug 47030 depends on bug 89079, which changed state.
Bug 89079 Summary: "Invalid compiler error: Segmentation fault" in module with
"equivalence" statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89079
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
The application of this patch caused PR 89079.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995
Liviu Ionescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilg at livius dot net
--- Comment #19 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66459
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-06-08 00:00:00 |2019-2-3
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89166
Bug ID: 89166
Summary: -static prevents liblto_plugin to be created
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87295
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Feb 3 10:53:01 2019
New Revision: 268485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268485&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Richard Biener
PR debug/87295
* dwarf2o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89167
Bug ID: 89167
Summary: internal compiler error due to mpfr assert at
init2.c:52
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66459
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89168
Bug ID: 89168
Summary: FAIL: cmd/go/internal/load
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89169
Bug ID: 89169
Summary: FAIL: internal/cpu
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at ai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89170
Bug ID: 89170
Summary: FAIL: net/http
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171
Bug ID: 89171
Summary: FAIL: go/build
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89172
Bug ID: 89172
Summary: FAIL: runtime/pprof
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89173
Bug ID: 89173
Summary: FAIL: runtime/pprof
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67679
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67679
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
This patch
Index: trans-array.c
===
--- trans-array.c (Revision 268432)
+++ trans-array.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -5960,19 +5960,7 @@ gfc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89174
Bug ID: 89174
Summary: [8/9 Regression] Allocation segfault with CLASS(*)
MOLD
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67679
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> Not sure if this
> is standard conforming (see PR 49755).
Actually, it's not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 3 14:37:08 2019
New Revision: 268486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268486&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/88685
* expr.c (is_sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 3 14:40:17 2019
New Revision: 268487
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268487&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/88
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 3 14:44:19 2019
New Revision: 268488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-02 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/88
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 3 14:50:07 2019
New Revision: 268489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/88
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 88980, which changed state.
Bug 88980 Summary: [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member
assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89175
Bug ID: 89175
Summary: gcc's conversion code from double to unsigned int
handles overflows incorrectly on x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89176
Bug ID: 89176
Summary: Vectorizer fails to consider narrower vector width for
res[i] = v1[i] < v2[i] ? v2[i] : v1[i]
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89174
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678
--- Comment #24 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Feb 3 16:19:36 2019
New Revision: 268492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak
PR libfortran/88678
Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314
--- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Feb 3 16:19:36 2019
New Revision: 268492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak
PR libfortran/88678
Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314
--- Comment #21 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Feb 3 16:21:06 2019
New Revision: 268493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268493&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak
PR libfortran/88678
Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678
--- Comment #25 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Feb 3 16:21:06 2019
New Revision: 268493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268493&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak
PR libfortran/88678
Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #15)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> > I assume that memory inputs are not problematic for SSE/AVX {R,}SQRT, RCP
> > and ROUND instructions. Contrary to CV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89177
Bug ID: 89177
Summary: unaligned memory access in libphobos
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
--- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Feb 3 16:48:41 2019
New Revision: 268496
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268496&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89071
* config/i386/i386.md (*sqrt2_sse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The only remaining question is on cvtsd2ss mem->xmm, where ICC goes with the
same strategy as with other non-conversion SSE unops:
vmovsdd(%rip), %xmm0
vcvtsd2ss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
but with cvtss2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #18)
> The only remaining question is on cvtsd2ss mem->xmm, where ICC goes with the
> same strategy as with other non-conversion SSE unops:
>
>vmovsdd(%rip), %xmm0
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89166
--- Comment #1 from Liviu Ionescu ---
a related bug is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89166
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
If you use -static in LDFLAGS, you will have other issues.
What are you trying to do?
This is like telling the doctor it hurts when I bend my arm the wrong way and
then the doctor tells you stop doing that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89092
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 3 18:23:25 2019
New Revision: 268501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/88
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89030
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89033
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86893
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89178
Bug ID: 89178
Summary: equality for composed types failt when a component has
a discriminant and redefines equality
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
Bug ID: 89179
Summary: compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67679
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Feb 3 19:38:25 2019
New Revision: 268502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/67679
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89166
--- Comment #3 from Liviu Ionescu ---
I tried all sort of configurations to build static executables, but I could not
find one that works while building Windows binaries (with mingw) and still
allow the liblto_plugin-0.dll to be created.
If the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh what host is this on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #3 from Vincent ---
It on MacOS Mojave 10.14.2.
The command line options are:
/usr/local/bin/g++-8 -c -DNDEBUG -O3 -fvisibility=hidden -Wall -Wextra
-pedantic-errors -DDARWIN -std=c++17 -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you add -save-temps and attach the preprocessed source?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #5 from Vincent ---
Hmm, hard to do, it is monumental and contains a ton of stuff I cannot share...
Sorry about that, I realize it makes diagnosis quite difficult.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ .
There is nothing we can help you with without any way of trying to reproduce
the bug.
A crash in ggc_set_mark means one of two things:
* Precompiled Headers were used and th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #7 from Vincent ---
I understand.
It might have something to do with 67650, which was been in gcc since 2005, and
is fully reproducible until now (8.2.0). It seems to be a memory error too.
Sadly, nobody ever gave it a try.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71935
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
You still have not answered my question about precompiled headers? Do you use
them?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> You still have not answered my question about precompiled headers? Do you
> use them?
If so the workaround is not to use them at all. See PR 61250 for informat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #10 from Vincent ---
Yes, sorry about that.
Alas, I don't use them...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Vincent from comment #10)
> Yes, sorry about that.
> Alas, I don't use them...
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction might be a good thing to
look into.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #12 from Vincent ---
Thanks, Andrew.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 84848, which changed state.
Bug 84848 Summary: [8/9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_3.f08/9
-fcoarray=single -O2 -latomic execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.0.1 |8.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Pete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14030
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|7.0 |7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0
--- Comment #6 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16093
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16804
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.1.0 |unknown
Target Milestone|8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.2.0
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Feb 3 21:48:27 2019
New Revision: 268503
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268503&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/44648 - missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
--- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> The report is misleading regarding version, thus I'm resetting the versions.
> For mips, sanitizer support was neither in gcc-8.0.1 nor gcc-8.1.0 nor
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60212
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89178
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug ID: 89180
Summary: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is not really possible, as libsanitizer/configure.tgt in 8.x doesn't
support mips at all, only GCC 9 has added:
+ mips*64*-*-linux*)
+ # This clause is only here to not match the supported mips*-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, no, you are forcing it to ignore that through --enable-libsanitizer. Don't
do that for unsupported targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63518
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #9)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> > The report is misleading regarding version, thus I'm resetting the versions.
> > For mips, sanitiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66439
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67759
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Feb 3 22:47:41 2019
New Revision: 268504
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268504&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69661 - missing -Wsequence-point warning
gcc/testsuite.ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70125
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70181
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|6.0 |6.3.0, 7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70180
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.3, 4.3.5, 4.4.7, 4.8.5,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70180
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
With -Wextra, Clang warns on one of the cases:
70180.cc:3:22: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has
undefined behavior if the offset is nonzero [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
void *p = (i
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
