https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89104
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 29 21:09:41 2019
New Revision: 268370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66676
PR ipa/89104
* omp-simd-clone.c (simd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66676
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 29 21:09:41 2019
New Revision: 268370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66676
PR ipa/89104
* omp-simd-clone.c (simd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
One more issue, shouldn't the #pragma GCC target be added before all include
files? Various define many inline functions, e.g. unwind-pe.h or unwind-cxx.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89109
Bug ID: 89109
Summary: Duplicates in COMPILER_PATH and LIBRARY_PATH and not
canonicalized absolute paths
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89110
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89110
Bug ID: 89110
Summary: r268343 breaks several tests in c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
The following patch fixes the testcase and seems to pass regression testing.
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5)
It does not fix the issue in comment #3. In fact, the simpler testcase
program pr89077_3
implicit none
character(20), parameter :: input = 'Forward'
integer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57048
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 29 22:40:26 2019
New Revision: 268372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/57048
* interfa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89106
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.1 20190129 (experimental) [trunk revision 268359] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88850
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89110
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80864
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87996
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89110
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 30 02:32:33 2019
New Revision: 268376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/89110
* g++.dg/other/nontype-1.C: Expect e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89110
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86218
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86943
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 30 02:43:04 2019
New Revision: 268377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86943 - wrong code converting lambda to function pointer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86943
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88761
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88752
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88956
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Jan 30 03:04:14 2019
New Revision: 268378
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268378&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/88956 - ICE: Floating point exception on a memcpy from
a zer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88956
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39985
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at magfr dot
user.lysator.liu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79010
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
>
>
> Alloca and VLA sizes are controlled by the -Walloca-larger-than= and
> -Wvla-larger-than= options (new in GCC 7). If it's thought to be useful to
> exclude
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89112
Bug ID: 89112
Summary: Incorrect code generated by rs6000 memcmp expansion
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89112
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Holland ---
Created attachment 45563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45563&action=edit
Output of gcc -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
Bug ID: 89113
Summary: Missed stack reuse opportunity when using compound
literals
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The question becomes what is the scope for the compound literal?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
That seems already fixed in gcc-9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
This PR is probably fixed by [1]. It looks that on powerpc feenableexcept fires
exception on stalled exception flags (these were raised when certain exception
was disabled).
Other than that, exception may fire
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 45564
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45564&action=edit
Proposed patch
This patch fixes all ieee.exp failures in x86 when configured with fpu-glibc.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89061
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 30 07:49:58 2019
New Revision: 268381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/89061
* c-tree.h (C_DECL_COMPOUND_LITERAL_P): Define.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89105
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 30 07:51:24 2019
New Revision: 268382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/89105
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_warn_parameter_pas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89105
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Can someone please test the patch in Comment #9 on powerpc? It should fix all
failures, modulo ieee_10.f90 which is fixed by [1].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg01685.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo