[Bug ada/88591] New: [9 regression] libada install fails with --enable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88591 Bug ID: 88591 Summary: [9 regression] libada install fails with --enable-shared Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug ada/88429] [9 regression] libada build fails with --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429 jamespharvey20 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamespharvey20 at gmail

[Bug ada/88591] [9 regression] libada install fails with --enable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88591 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88592] New: Passing of packed structures on sparc64 different than in clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88592 Bug ID: 88592 Summary: Passing of packed structures on sparc64 different than in clang Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/88593] New: internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88593 Bug ID: 88593 Summary: internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/88594] New: [9 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88594 Bug ID: 88594 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/88595] New: Template type lacking template-id-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88595 Bug ID: 88595 Summary: Template type lacking template-id-expr Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug inline-asm/62144] "Frame pointer required, but reserved" error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 coypu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||coypu at sdf dot org --- Comment #10 from coypu

[Bug rtl-optimization/88593] internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88593 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/88593] internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88593 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug rtl-optimization/88593] internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88593 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #2) > cleanup_cfg may change the cfg and thus make cached dominance info stale, > but it doesn't free/invalidate it. Shouldn't cleanup_cfg be fixed?

[Bug rtl-optimization/88593] internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88593 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov --- It seems to avoid this sort of gotchas cleanup_cfg should gcc_checking_assert (!dom_info_available_p (CDI_DOMINATORS)); gcc_checking_assert (!dom_info_available_p (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS)); but maybe t

[Bug rtl-optimization/88596] New: [9 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88596 Bug ID: 88596 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-

[Bug tree-optimization/88597] New: Compile time hog w/ -O1 -fpeel-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88597 Bug ID: 88597 Summary: Compile time hog w/ -O1 -fpeel-loops Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/82993] ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82993 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82993] ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82993 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > It seems one of my recent patches may have fixed this one. > > % gfcx d.f90 > d.f90:5:30: > > 5 |type(t), parameter :: z = 1 > |

[Bug fortran/82993] ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82993 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/81984] NULL string pointer dereferencing forces undefined behaviour in libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81984 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/88595] Template type lacking template-id-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88595 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug c++/88385] [9 regression] ICE in tsubst_pack_expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88385 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug c++/87513] [8/9 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87513 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com