https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88485
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@li-snyder.org
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88414
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Started with r257077. In any case, it seems to be a LRA error-recovery bug.
> We first properly diagnose that the inline asm has constraints that are
> imposs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Bug ID: 88489
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vfixupimmss-2.c execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Dec 13 17:47:52 2018
New Revision: 267099
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267099&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87531] Fix second bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035
--- Comment #13 from Nathaniel J. Smith ---
Unfortunately, AFAICT, the omp_pause_resource APIs don't actually solve the
problem.
They're fine and useful if you have a single piece of code that wants to use
both omp and fork(). But, this was neve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42778
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38658
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.3.5, 4.4.7, 4.8.5, 4.9.4,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
Bug ID: 88490
Summary: Missed autovectorization when indices are different
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
Ehh, small typo. This is correct version, also not vectorized:
[code]
struct S
{
double* __restrict__ * __restrict__ d;
};
void test(S* __restrict__ s, int n, int k)
{
if (n > k)
{
fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88491
Bug ID: 88491
Summary: new test case allocfail.sh in r267054 fails if dash is
the default shell (/bin/sh)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88482
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88416
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 13 19:44:50 2018
New Revision: 267105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/88416
* valtrack.c (cleanup_auto_inc_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88416
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in in |[8 Regression] ICE in in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For masked gathers it is now fixed on the trunk, for masked stores I'll have a
look tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71044
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 13 20:33:55 2018
New Revision: 267106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/71044 optimize std::filesystem::path construction
This new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88477
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I'm referring to C17 6.7.9#3, in the constraints for initializers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71044
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> Before the code is moved from std::experimental::filesystem to
> std::filesystem (and into the shared library) there are a few improvements
> that should be m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88216
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88216
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Dec 13 20:47:32 2018
New Revision: 267108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88216 - ICE with class type in non-type template paramet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88479
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> The C standard would have to drop ones' complement and sign-magnitude first.
And there's substantial support for doing so.
> In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88414
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Dec 13 20:54:27 2018
New Revision: 267109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267109&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-13 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/88414
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #5)
>
> Unfortunately, this doesn't work: the first time through, _locks[0] was
> already 8-byte aligned and everything worked fine. This remained when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88414
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|amodra at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87241
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88470
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Hmm, it looks like combine is removing the long call.
hello2.c.262r.ud_dce:
(insn 10 9 11 2 (set (reg/f:SI 127)
(high:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("printf") [flags 0x41] ))) "hello2.c":5:3 651 {elf_high}
(n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
>> 8, but that let the constructor already fail the first time through
>> where _d_arraycopy checks that the right amount of data is copied:
>>
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #7)
> > --- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
> >> 8, but that let the constructor already fail the first time through
> >> where _d_arraycopy checks that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88470
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 13 23:33:57 2018
New Revision: 267112
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/88470
* cfgcleanup.c (outgoing_edges_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 13 23:35:10 2018
New Revision: 267113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88444
* tree-inline.c (fold_marked_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88470
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88479
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4)
> If you want to do modulo arithmetic on signed values, the idiom (in
> common-usage C which supports conversions to signed integer types as being
> m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
I don't profess to grok the intracecies of combine, but ISTM that the stored
indirection needs the moral equivalent of "used", or else it should surely be a
candidate for removal. After all, that's a useful op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 45235
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45235&action=edit
fix
r266604, git 0a4b5c66df9, "[RS6000] Use standard call patterns for
__tls_get_addr calls" is the patch that reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87292
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88492
Bug ID: 88492
Summary: SLP optimization generates ugly code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88399
Lukas Schork changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
