https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88445
Bug ID: 88445
Summary: noexcept(expr) should return true with -fno-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We end up with non-folded statement
_22 = (long int) 0;
because of all the disabled and enabled optimizations (IPA-VRP propagated
constant not cleaned up).
I think:
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj 2018-12-07 00:27:2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88145
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Dec 11 08:30:36 2018
New Revision: 266973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266973&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Don't use rs6000_isa_flags_explicit for soft float tests (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88445
--- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin ---
Hm... This was discussed in Clang and looks like such optimization could break
ABI and cause ODR violations https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27442#c4
If nothing changed since then, I'm OK with closin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446
Bug ID: 88446
Summary: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated rejects some converted
constant expressions.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The problem is here ^^^ I think, i.e. we have a volatile variant. The
> problem may come from the Ada front-end, but it would be nice to have Jan's
> viewpoint.
It comes from libgnarl/s-tpobop.ads:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88447
Bug ID: 88447
Summary: Non-contiguous array argument of some class not passed
properly to subroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88447
--- Comment #1 from martin ---
Here is a smaller reproducer. The component "integer :: i" in type t is
necessary to reproduce the bug.
module mod
implicit none
private
public qv
type, public :: s
real, dimension(1:3) :: vec
end type s
typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
This config line works fine:
../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.266950 \
--disable-multilib \
--disable-werror \
--enable-checking=df,extra,fold,rtl,yes \
--e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87951
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #14)
> This is a duplicate of bug 87950, with most of the same discussion.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87950 ***
I think I need to add an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448
Bug ID: 88448
Summary: [9 regression] gnat.dg/opt66.adb etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83377
--- Comment #3 from Vinay Kumar ---
The below mentioned pattern match in match.pd generates the assembly code
similar to subtraction.
==
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index fbb4d6f..3cde6a6 1006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha ---
Aha. Segher, you've helpfully reminded me about -msoft-float w/ your recent
commit. So it's not (solely) my misconfiguration once again:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/sshcIF
(it's g++, because gcc for powerpc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 10:28:39 2018
New Revision: 266974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/86004
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (lto_incremental): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88447
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I cannot get that to fail either, with a trunk compiler :-/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88438
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha ---
Could your r266973 fix a root cause of this issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
AT12.0 however, like on godbolt, does in fact crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
>
> --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha ---
> Could your r266973 fix a root cause of thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88204
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*,powerpc-*-ai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #13 from Arseny Solokha ---
In decl_address_invariant_p() we hit this break:
3423 case VAR_DECL:
3424 if ((TREE_STATIC (op) || DECL_EXTERNAL (op))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88449
Bug ID: 88449
Summary: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated misbehaves due to
constexpr call caching
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
And none of the compilers I built crash. (Most have checking enabled, but some
not, so that's not it either).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88449
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37369
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Dec 11 11:26:15 2018
New Revision: 267019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[aarch64] PR target/87369 Prefer bsl/bit/bif for copysign
The copys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87369
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Dec 11 11:26:15 2018
New Revision: 267019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[aarch64] PR target/87369 Prefer bsl/bit/bif for copysign
The copys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84949
Matthias Kretz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kretz at kde dot org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87369
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84949
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Kretz ---
Example showing the discrepancy: https://godbolt.org/z/D15m71
Also PR83875 is relevant wrt. giving different answers depending on function
attributes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Dec 11 11:59:53 2018
New Revision: 267020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix a failure in the libiberty testsuite by increasing the demangle recursi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88415
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 11 13:00:49 2018
New Revision: 267021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-11 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/88448
PR mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 11 13:00:49 2018
New Revision: 267021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-11 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/88448
PR mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86637
--- Comment #11 from Arseny Solokha ---
Can this PR be closed now, or are there some issues left?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
Bug ID: 88450
Summary: ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The static_assert bug is related to PR86524.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88426
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 13:51:44 2018
New Revision: 267022
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267022&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/88426
* c-convert.c (convert): Call c_fully_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88426
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Compiler |[8 Regression] Compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88451
Bug ID: 88451
Summary: No rounding in fixed-point arithmetic (Decimal to
fixed-point conversion, multiplication)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess the middle-end relies on TYPE_NAME to have the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT type
rather than be qualified. The question if just here and it is possible to cope
with that, or elsewhere too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88452
Bug ID: 88452
Summary: gfortran (Gentoo 8.2.0-r5 p1.6) 8.2.0 reports internal
error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88416
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88425
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 14:50:22 2018
New Revision: 267023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88425
* config/i386/i386.md (*x86_movcc_0_m1_neg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 45210
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45210&action=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Claudiu: could you test that patch please? (On the real thing, not just
this testcase :-) )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87950
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
Tomalak Geret'kal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at kera dot name
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88453
Bug ID: 88453
Summary: GCC pretends that constexpr default-constructible type
is nothrow constructible
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Richard, do you know if there's an issue for this yet?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88453
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87603
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
Yeap, the warnings was written at the time all C++ types had TYPE_NAMEs
and other types used IDENTIFIER_NODE. I have chnaged it for memory use
reaosns so only main variants have IDENTIFIER_NODE. Usually we wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88452
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88454
Bug ID: 88454
Summary: [9 regression] test case
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-5.c fails after r266971
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88434
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Giese ---
It appears there is a CWG issue for this:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1835
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88375
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88454
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 17:16:48 2018
New Revision: 267026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267026&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88444
* tree-vrp.c (register_edge_ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I guess the middle-end relies on TYPE_NAME to have the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT
> type rather than be qualified. The question if just here and it is possible
> to cope with that, or elsewhere too.
Yes, but only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88435
Mattis Lind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88434
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86608
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:53:03 2018
New Revision: 267030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86608 - reading constexpr volatile variable.
* c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86608
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87951
--- Comment #17 from Vitali ---
I was explicitly asked to open this as a separate bug in comment #7 of 87950.
Would be helpful if the GCC devs could coordinate to figure out if they want
separate bugs for C/C++ or 1 bug.
Jonathan, on this forum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80520
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 20:28:35 2018
New Revision: 267031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/80520
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87861
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 20:37:53 2018
New Revision: 267032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267032&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/87861
* class.c (build_vtbl_initializer): For TARG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
--- Comment #5 from Richard Smith ---
This was just reported as http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2018/12/5320.php; I
don't believe it's on the core issues list yet.
[@Tomalak, I think the standard is clear here:
"If the assignment-expression in th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87861
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455
Bug ID: 88455
Summary: False positive for allocatable character array of
deferred length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD
[-Wuninitialized]
Product: gcc
Version: unkno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83562
--- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira ---
This can easily be fixed by way of a trampoline that adjusts the parameter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455
--- Comment #1 from Adam Hirst ---
I'm not sure whether they're related, but I found a handful of
potentially-similar bugs, which might be worth collating here for quicker
reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28660
https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88375
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455
--- Comment #2 from Adam Hirst ---
Slightly reduced - the issue occurs even in the MAIN program:
program test
implicit none
integer :: a, b, c
character(:), allocatable :: line(:)
a = 1; b = 10; c = 30
allocat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86979
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53714
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 11 23:04:39 2018
New Revision: 267034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libada/
PR ada/88429
* configure.ac (default_gnatlib_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88249
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Dec 11 23:13:19 2018
New Revision: 267035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267035&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88249
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88249
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Dec 11 23:39:43 2018
New Revision: 267036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267036&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88249
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
