[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87449, which changed state. Bug 87449 Summary: -Wunused-variable and associate https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87449 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/88412] New: Associate segmentation fault assigning to derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88412 Bug ID: 88412 Summary: Associate segmentation fault assigning to derived type Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: easyhack Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7/8/9 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So if one manually does the sinking I suggest in c#14, we get the key insns into their own block (it's not *that* convoluted). That's still not enough to address the regression in this BZ. We lose the und

[Bug target/79185] [7/8 Regression] register allocation in the addition of two 128/9 bit ints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79185 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] register |[7/8 Regression] register

[Bug ipa/85103] [8/9 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 --- Comment #16 from Pat Haugen --- > > Do you observe the same slowdown if you restore either of the params to > the value before the r257582 change? > --param max-inline-insns-auto=40 results in the same degradation. --param inline-min-spee

[Bug middle-end/88401] -Wshift-overflow only works for const variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88401 --- Comment #5 from Ulya --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) Right, I see. Bugzilla forced me to add the previous comment when I changed the status. ;)

[Bug ipa/85103] [8/9 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka --- I am re-doing benchmarks now to see where we are standing with gcc9. I have checked reducing max-inline-insns-single as Richard mentioned, reducing to 200 or 300 basically brings one regression and that is Cac

[Bug lto/88396] -flto -Wl,--whole-archive causes "multiple definition" errors in elfutils (only for bfd, not gold)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88396 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug target/88331] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_layout, at cfgrtl.c:2987

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88331 --- Comment #5 from mateuszb at poczta dot onet.pl --- Bug started with r266345 Both files pixel.ii and slicetype.ii could be compile by gcc 9 r266344 and both files ICE gcc 9 r266345. I've attached xz archive with both *.ii files (maybe it helps

[Bug fortran/88412] Associate segmentation fault assigning to derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88412 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/88411] [9 Regression] Random crashes for ASYNCHRONOUS writes (bad locking?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88413] New: g++ mangles names involving unresolved names in function argument template parameters differently from the ABI standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88413 Bug ID: 88413 Summary: g++ mangles names involving unresolved names in function argument template parameters differently from the ABI standard. Product: gcc Versi

[Bug c++/88413] g++ mangles names involving unresolved names in function argument template parameters differently from the ABI standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88413 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, interesting because the C++ demanager that is part of GCC is able to demanage GCC's and not clang's.

[Bug c++/88413] g++ mangles names involving unresolved names in function argument template parameters differently from the ABI standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88413 --- Comment #2 from brennan at umanwizard dot com --- I find the opposite, on whatever ancient version of c++filt ships with macOS: $ c++filt --version GNU c++filt 070207 20070207 Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free

[Bug c++/88413] g++ mangles names involving unresolved names in function argument template parameters differently from the ABI standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88413 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- [apinski@linux gcc]$ c++filt _Z1gIiEvP2S1IXsr2S2IT_EE3valEE _Z1gIiEvP2S1IXsr2S2IT_EE3valEE [apinski@linux gcc]$ c++filt _Z1gIiEvP2S1IXsr2S2IT_E3valEE void g(S1::val>*) [apinski@linux gcc]$ c++filt --version G

[Bug c++/88413] g++ mangles names involving unresolved names in function argument template parameters differently from the ABI standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88413 --- Comment #4 from brennan at umanwizard dot com --- Investigating a bit more, it seems Apple patched their c++filt to just call into __cxa_demangle in their own libc++abi , so it makes sense that c++filt on macOS matches clang and on Linux match

[Bug target/79636] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79636 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug inline-asm/69899] gcc ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "replace_reg"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69899 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/80540] gcc ICE at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in "assign_by_spills"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80540 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug rtl-optimization/88416] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3013

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88416 Bug ID: 88416 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3013 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/88414] New: [9 Regression] ICE in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88414 Bug ID: 88414 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1624 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/88415] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88415 Bug ID: 88415 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-o

[Bug tree-optimization/58318] very slow compilation on x86_64-linux with -O3 and -g and checking enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58318 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/88413] g++ mangles names involving unresolved names in function argument template parameters differently from the ABI standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88413 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC has the following in it: ::= sr# dependent name ::= sr*/ Hmm, maybe the ABI changed and GCC did not change with it ...

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 --- Comment #4 from Jiangning Liu --- I expect "gcc -O3 -flto" could work.

[Bug target/55523] gencondmd C++ conversion breaks peephole2 predicates use of get_attr_*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55523 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/88397] attribute malloc ignored on function pointers when alloc_size is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88397 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/39222] out of memory bootstrapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39222 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88399] New: program segmentation faults when out-of-memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88399 Bug ID: 88399 Summary: program segmentation faults when out-of-memory Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug sanitizer/88400] New: address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 Bug ID: 88400 Summary: address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 hhj changed: What|Removed |Added CC||He.Hongjun at zte dot com.cn --- Comment #1 from h

[Bug c++/87861] [9 regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87861 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Please provide a testcase to reproduce the issue. Also note that GCC 6 is no longer supported. This sounds like an issue in the libsanitizer interceptor to me, the pthread_create interceptor does // W

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug c/88392] Incorrect error message when using bitfields in void *pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88392 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also this seems like it is an upstream issue too.

[Bug c/88391] Request - attribute for adding tags to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88391 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

<    1   2