[Bug middle-end/88273] warning: 'memcpy' offset [-527, -529] is out of the bounds [0, 16] of object 'vrsave' with type 'union ' [-Warray-bounds]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88273 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- The creduced file definitely does not represent at all the original file. It is the second call to user_regset_copyin which is complaining. Without looking into the gimple dump, I think there is jump thread

[Bug libgcc/88267] A new flag in GCC causes a divergence in crtbegin.o file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88267 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- But it's hidden, so I'm not sure we care. OTOH not sure why options.h is being pulled in.

[Bug tree-optimization/88272] warning: iteration 9223372036854775807 invokes undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88272 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug middle-end/88273] [8/9 Regression] warning: 'memcpy' offset [-527, -529] is out of the bounds [0, 16] of object 'vrsave' with type 'union ' [-Warray-bounds]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Indeed it fixes the issue at hand. I won't be able to perform full regtest until the beginning of next week, though.

[Bug rtl-optimization/88275] New: Memory hog in selective scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88275 Bug ID: 88275 Summary: Memory hog in selective scheduler Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: memory-hog Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/88276] New: AVX512: reorder bit ops to get free and operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88276 Bug ID: 88276 Summary: AVX512: reorder bit ops to get free and operation Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/88234] UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Author: jakub > Date: Thu Nov 29 14:23:21 2018 > New Revision: 266619 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266619&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > PR targ

[Bug sanitizer/88277] New: ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88277 Bug ID: 88277 Summary: ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug testsuite/88265] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails when using --with-arch=...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Instead of adding -march= please add instead say -mavx2 -mno-avx512f or > whatever ISA set you want to pick, and probably also > -mprefer-vector-width=2

[Bug sanitizer/88277] ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88277 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/87807] passing float/double vectors as variadic args fails on-64bit SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87807 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > Thanks for reporting the problem. Great, thanks for the quick fix. Rainer

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 30 10:37:39 2018 New Revision: 266659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266659&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-30 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/88274

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- With additional -mbranch-cost=1 the gimple dumps are identical on x86_64 with -m32 until reassoc1, which decides differently for some reason - diff from powerpc64 to x86_64: -Optimizing range tests _7 -[3, 3]

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- > With additional -mbranch-cost=1 the gimple d

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- The regression started with r265241 BTW. Here is a reassoc patch I wrote that also fixes this ICE: --- gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c.jj 2018-10-23 10:13:25.278875175 +0200 +++ gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c 2018-11-

[Bug testsuite/88265] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails when using --with-arch=...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/88265] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails when using --with-arch=...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 30 10:48:51 2018 New Revision: 20 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Restrict vector extension to use 128bit vectors (PR testsuite/88265). 201

[Bug target/88278] New: Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 Bug ID: 88278 Summary: Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 > > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- > The regression started with r265241 BTW. >

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8/9 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, arm ignores the BRANCH_COST altogether: #define LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT\ ((optimize_size) \ ? (TARGET_THU

[Bug middle-end/88279] New: unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 Bug ID: 88279 Summary: unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call' Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > Maybe Eric wants to chime in. IIRC we went through great lengths to > preserve VRP using TYPE_MIN/MAX_VALUE to elide bounds checking for Ada? It's the opposite, we need to hide TYPE_MIN/MAX_VALUE to pres

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 Stephen Kim changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephen.kim at oracle dot com --- Comment

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 --- Comment #5 from Stephen Kim --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > As of October 2017, glibc has a testcase that having main in a shared > library works - that's a valid use case, which should work with crt1.o. > If it

[Bug middle-end/88279] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28

[Bug tree-optimization/88272] warning: iteration 9223372036854775807 invokes undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88272 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- > Where do we set the cut-off? ;) -fuser-patience= I would cut it off for things that are obviously derived from sign of 64bit value :)) Those are most common. Honza

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- > It's the opposite, we need to hide TYPE_MIN/MAX_VALUE to preserve checks in > Ada, otherwise the optimizer happily removes them. To be more explicit: in Ada, you can check at run time whether a value is v

[Bug middle-end/88279] [9 Regression] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88280] New: missing folding of logical and bitwise AND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88280 Bug ID: 88280 Summary: missing folding of logical and bitwise AND Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8/9 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8/9 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is enough to test it with: cd build-dir/gcc make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp='binop-xor1.c builtin-bswap-7.c pr21643.c pr46309.c' tree-ssa.exp='forwprop-28.c phi-opt-11.c phi-opt-2.c reassoc-32.c reass

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 Stephen Kim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/88281] New: SLP permutation check fails to fall back to strided loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88281 Bug ID: 88281 Summary: SLP permutation check fails to fall back to strided loads Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/88281] SLP permutation check fails to fall back to strided loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/88274] ICE in check, at tree-vrp.c:188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88274 > > --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- > > It's the opposite, we need to hide T

[Bug target/88278] Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/88280] missing folding of logical and bitwise AND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88280 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug middle-end/88279] [9 Regression] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/88282] New: ICE in df_install_refs at gcc/df-scan.c:2379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88282 Bug ID: 88282 Summary: ICE in df_install_refs at gcc/df-scan.c:2379 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/88283] New: ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88283 Bug ID: 88283 Summary: ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6677 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/88282] ICE in df_install_refs at gcc/df-scan.c:2379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88282 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- One related testcase that fails: $ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr41470.c -fstack-clash-protection -O2 -fno-tree-ccp during RTL pass: reload /home/marxin/Programming

[Bug c++/88258] [9 Regression] Infinite loop emitting diagnostics in the C++ front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/88279] [9 Regression] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug libgcc/88267] A new flag in GCC causes a divergence in crtbegin.o file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88267 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > But it's hidden, so I'm not sure we care. I noticed that using objdump -d where the tools assigns names to locations of which it knows name. > OTOH not sure wh

[Bug middle-end/88279] [9 Regression] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov --- To clarify, the decl/type mixup is causing the compiler to use local-dynamic TLS references where general-dynamic are intended (and were used prior to the patch).

[Bug middle-end/88279] [9 Regression] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/88282] ICE in df_install_refs at gcc/df-scan.c:2379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88282 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88284] New: nios2: pessimistic ldw-to-stwio scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88284 Bug ID: 88284 Summary: nios2: pessimistic ldw-to-stwio scheduling Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/88280] missing folding of logical and bitwise AND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88280 --- Comment #2 from denis.campredon at gmail dot com --- I don't know if I should create a separate bug report or not, since it looks kind of related. I've tried to replace the operator of the function e with other and it generates a branch with t

[Bug lto/88220] LTO ICE with GNU inline and alias's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88220 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- So the issue is that in WPA we mix: void a() __asm__("open64"); and void open64() {} Then we stream out: *open64/0 (a) @0x7698f5a0 Type: function definition analyzed Visibility: externally_visible p

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 --- Comment #35 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 30 14:25:15 2018 New Revision: 24 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=24&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make red zone size more flexible for stack variables (PR sanitizer/81715)

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88278] Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88278] Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug gcov-profile/88279] [9 Regression] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 30 15:06:22 2018 New Revision: 26 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=26&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Call decl_default_tls_model with a proper type (PR gcov-profile/88279). 2

[Bug gcov-profile/88279] [9 Regression] unresolvable R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocation against symbol `__gcov_indirect_call'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88279 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88278] Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > All these use something like: > (insn 7 6 13 2 (set (reg:V8SI 87) > (unspec:V8SI [ > (mem:V4SI (reg:DI 90) [0 *x_3(D)+0 S16 A128]) >

[Bug target/88278] Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, we also have vec_concatv2di pattern that handles: (set (match_operand:V2DI 0 ("register_operand") ("=Yr,*x,x ,v ,v,v ,x ,x,v ,x,x,v")) (vec_concat:V2DI (match_operand:DI 1 ("nonimm

[Bug target/88278] Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- I wonder about something like: --- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2018-11-29 23:16:06.481301632 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2018-11-30 16:21:21.480379008 +0100 @@ -7248,6 +7248,17 @@ (set_attr "pre

[Bug preprocessor/88257] [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Nov 30 15:57:37 2018 New Revision: 266671 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266671&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix ICE in substring locations from macros in header files (PR preproce

[Bug c++/87897] [9 Regression] ICE in maybe_constant_value, at cp/constexpr.c:5255 since r265788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87897 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Any progress on this? It really slows down test runs as it hangs twice and has to wait for the timeout to occur to continue.

[Bug preprocessor/88257] [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88278] Fails to elide zeroing of upper vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On November 30, 2018 4:28:54 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88278 > >--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- >I wonder about something

[Bug tree-optimization/88285] New: [9 Regression] gcc.dg/predict-22.c fails on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88285 Bug ID: 88285 Summary: [9 Regression] gcc.dg/predict-22.c fails on arm Product: gcc Version: 6.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8/9 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 --- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon --- Hi Jakub, thanks for doing this. I tested on many combination of arm* targets, and it was OK except for some of them: --target arm-none-eabi --with-mode thumb --with-cpu cortex-m3 --with-fpu default --tar

[Bug target/88282] ICE in df_install_refs at gcc/df-scan.c:2379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88282 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/87718] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-concatv2si-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/88137] BACKTRACE seems to have a memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88137 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Fri Nov 30 16:44:27 2018 New Revision: 266677 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266677&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Initialize backtrace state once From backtrace.h for backtrace_create_stat

[Bug fortran/88137] BACKTRACE seems to have a memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88137 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Fri Nov 30 16:46:55 2018 New Revision: 266678 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266678&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Initialize backtrace state once From backtrace.h for backtrace_create_stat

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8/9 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45129|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/88286] New: gfortran reports conflicting intent(in) with an intent(in) declared class variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88286 Bug ID: 88286 Summary: gfortran reports conflicting intent(in) with an intent(in) declared class variable Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug rtl-optimization/87246] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87246 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- And that hook indeed returns the need for secondary reload there, so looks like LRA bug for not honoring it?

[Bug fortran/88286] gfortran reports conflicting intent(in) with an intent(in) declared class variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88286 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/87496] ICE in aggregate_value_p at gcc/function.c:2046

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Fri Nov 30 18:57:33 2018 New Revision: 266680 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266680&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR target/87496 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr86

[Bug target/88282] ICE in df_install_refs at gcc/df-scan.c:2379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88282 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3) > This is caused by the change in r266385 for PR87718. > > That causes the cost model to go completely off the rail and also changes > the register classes. >

[Bug tree-optimization/88285] [9 Regression] gcc.dg/predict-22.c fails on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88285 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- However, this same commit also introduced a regression: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test with gcc configured --target arm-none-l

[Bug target/88287] New: [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 Bug ID: 88287 Summary: [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- FAILs just because it has too much scan-assembler in it and expects something in particular, or do we generate worse code? The patch certainly added some canonicalization that was previously done only for sca

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, it is unclear to me how to reproduce it, I've tried ./cc1plus -quiet -O -msve-vector-bits=256 vcond_1.C -o vcond_1.s -nostdinc -march=armv8.4-a+simd with the match.pd changes reverted and the same withou

[Bug sanitizer/88277] ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88277 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org --- Comment

[Bug libgomp/88288] New: [OpenACC, libgomp] Adjust offsets for present data clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88288 Bug ID: 88288 Summary: [OpenACC, libgomp] Adjust offsets for present data clauses Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc, patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/88179] [9 regression][MIPS] pr84941.c ICE in lra_eliminate_reg_if_possible at lra-eliminations.c:1393 start with r266385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88179 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Nov 30 20:15:56 2018 New Revision: 266682 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266682&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-30 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/88179

[Bug target/85220] [meta-bug, nvptx] Run trunk with og7 openacc testcases and analyze execution failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sch

[Bug sanitizer/88289] New: [9 regression] r266664 causes asan to fail on many/most tests on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88289 Bug ID: 88289 Summary: [9 regression] r24 causes asan to fail on many/most tests on BE Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/87924] OpenACC wait clauses without async-arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87924 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Nov 30 20:39:30 2018 New Revision: 266686 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266686&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR87924] Add (XFAILed) test cases for OpenACC wait clauses without

[Bug libgomp/88288] [OpenACC, libgomp] Adjust offsets for present data clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88288 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Nov 30 20:39:49 2018 New Revision: 266688 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266688&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR88288, OpenACC, libgomp] Adjust offsets for present data clauses

[Bug debug/85550] [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 30 20:55:41 2018 New Revision: 266689 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266689&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/85550 * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr85550.C: New test.

[Bug debug/85550] [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/87462] [7/8 Regression] undefined reference error occurs when -g, -fdebug-types-section and -O2 are used at the same time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug libgomp/88288] [OpenACC, libgomp] Adjust offsets for present data clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88288 --- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why not update goacc_parallel_keyed to use gomp_map_val instead computing devaddrs manually? That would help reduce the number of duplicate mystery formulas in libgomp.

[Bug libgomp/88288] [OpenACC, libgomp] Adjust offsets for present data clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88288 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, stephen.kim at oracle dot com wrote: > The glibc commit that triggered this bug is: > bfff8b1becd7d01c074177df7196ab327cd8c844 That's the copyright date updates for 2

[Bug fortran/88269] ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88269 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-*-linux-gnu CC|

  1   2   >