[Bug tree-optimization/88259] New: vectorization failure for a typical loop for getting max value and index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88259 Bug ID: 88259 Summary: vectorization failure for a typical loop for getting max value and index Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81896] omp target enter data not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81896 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/88152] optimize SSE & AVX char compares with subsequent movmskb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88152 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Kretz --- > -fno-signed-zeros isn't a guarantee the operand will not be -0.0 and having > x < 0.0 behave differently based on whether x is -0.0 or 0.0 (with > -fno-signed-zeros quite randomly) is IMHO very bad. I agr

[Bug lto/87988] [9 regression] Streaming of ABSTRACT_ORIGIN is expensive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988 > > --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- > We still have: >/* When not generating

[Bug tree-optimization/88259] vectorization failure for a typical loop for getting max value and index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88259 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/88223] [8 Regression] Wrong code for intrinsic memmove

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223 > > --- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> --- > On Wed, 28

[Bug sanitizer/88260] New: c++ code instrumented with address sanitizer crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88260 Bug ID: 88260 Summary: c++ code instrumented with address sanitizer crashes Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/87750] [8/9 Regression] Failed compilation / parsing of template member call after 'using' declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/88259] vectorization failure for a typical loop for getting max value and index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88259 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/88236] [avr] Invalid code generated for __memx char pointer deference for avr5 arch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88236 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|una

[Bug fortran/88247] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug driver/47785] GCC with -flto does not pass -Wa options to the assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Note the proposed solution only works for uniform -Wa options across all TUs participating in the optimizing link. Otherwise partitioning can merge parts of TUs with different flags and there is (IIRC) no

[Bug tree-optimization/88243] [9 Regression] ice in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/88253] Inlining of function incorrectly deletes volatile register access when using XOR in avr-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88253 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Note GCC 5 is out of support, please see if you can reproduce this with a newer version (GCC 7 and up).

[Bug ipa/88256] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in make_ssa_name_fn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/88257] [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug sanitizer/88260] c++ code instrumented with address sanitizer crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88260 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88259] vectorization failure for a typical loop for getting max value and index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88259 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/88258] [9 Regression] Infinite loop emitting diagnostics in the C++ front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/88256] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in make_ssa_name_fn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I see it fixed on trunk since r257620.

[Bug ipa/88256] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in make_ssa_name_fn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- And appeared on trunk before that in r235817.

[Bug c++/88258] [9 Regression] Infinite loop emitting diagnostics in the C++ front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88258 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 45120 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45120&action=edit preprocessed source to reproduce diagnostic loop Confirmed, here is a reproducer I found the other day.

[Bug c++/88258] [9 Regression] Infinite loop emitting diagnostics in the C++ front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88258 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|openmp | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/85953] [7/8 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Summary|[7/8/9 Regression]

[Bug ipa/88256] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in make_ssa_name_fn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- But the fix seems to be specific to C front-end and does not cover C++? This time it's not (only) my mistake in the way I configure gcc: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/2xRIE_

[Bug c++/88256] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in make_ssa_name_fn), C++ FE missing DECL_EXPRs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Component|ipa

[Bug c++/88256] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in make_ssa_name_fn), C++ FE missing DECL_EXPRs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #4) > But the fix seems to be specific to C front-end and does not cover C++? Yeah, I can reproduce with the C++ FE which probably needs a similar fix.

[Bug target/88224] Wrong Cortex-R7 and Cortex-R8 FPU configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88224 --- Comment #2 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: avieira Date: Thu Nov 29 10:20:13 2018 New Revision: 266612 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266612&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH] [Arm] Fix fpu configurations for Cortex-R7 and Corte

[Bug c++/88261] New: [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261 Bug ID: 88261 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyw

[Bug rtl-optimization/88253] Inlining of function incorrectly deletes volatile register access when using XOR in avr-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88253 --- Comment #2 from William Westfield --- I did say that it still happens with 8.1... However, the 5.4.0 version is the latest version supported by the vendor.

[Bug c++/88221] Only restricted set of balanced token sequences allowed for attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88221 Bruno De Fraine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruno-gcc at defraine dot net --- Comm

[Bug preprocessor/88257] [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug preprocessor/88257] [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > I can't reproduce, but looks very similar to PR87721. https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/o14PZF > GNU C++14 (GCC-Explorer-Build) version 9.0.0 20181128 (experimental) >

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I can confirm that in openSUSE build service, but I have very limited access to a s390x machine. I checked the patch and I don't see any obvious error. Can you please debug that?

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 45121 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45121&action=edit Clean up patch The patch is only cosmetic, should not affect generated code.

[Bug driver/88262] New: gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 Bug ID: 88262 Summary: gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/88243] [9 Regression] ice in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88243 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So we are arriving here with a vect_nested_cycle def from the pattern_def sequence but the code only expects to be called with the last stmt of a reduction pattern. t.c:5:5: note: Analyze phi: e_25 = PHI

[Bug c++/88263] New: ICE in coverage_begin_function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88263 Bug ID: 88263 Summary: ICE in coverage_begin_function Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assign

[Bug c++/87750] [8/9 Regression] Failed compilation / parsing of template member call after 'using' declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45118|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- >From the gcc driver's point of view this is just a normal link since it does not know where main is defined.

[Bug libstdc++/88119] std::alignment_of returns wrong value (__alignof instead of alignof).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88119 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Nov 29 12:32:57 2018 New Revision: 266613 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266613&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/88119 use alignof in std::alignment_of, not __alignof__ Now

[Bug libstdc++/88119] std::alignment_of returns wrong value (__alignof instead of alignof).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/88125] Erroneous duplicate "basic_stringbuf" symbol entry in libstdc++ gnu.ver file.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88125 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/87531] [8/9 Regression] assignment operator does nothing if performed as a call via operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Nov 29 12:50:45 2018 New Revision: 266614 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266614&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/87531] operator= lookup in templates https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug c++/87531] [8/9 Regression] assignment operator does nothing if performed as a call via operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88234] UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4) > This is documented in the ELFv2 ABI, linked from > https://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html . > > ... > (The vec_vsx_st doesn't have to do with the problem btw.

[Bug tree-optimization/88243] [9 Regression] ice in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88243] [9 Regression] ice in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88243 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 29 13:33:59 2018 New Revision: 266615 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266615&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-29 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/88243

[Bug driver/88262] gcc uses crt1.o in place of Scrt1.o when the main function is in a PIC shared lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/88263] ICE in coverage_begin_function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88263 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88261] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCO

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- I see segfault in driver in: Thread 2.1 "collect2" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to process 11687] 0x03fffbd4192e in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x03fffbd4192e in raise

[Bug preprocessor/88257] [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/88234] UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #8) > Yeah, I tried to convert to the C/C++ pointer dereference pattern several > times as shown in the literature. I.e., this: > > byte x[16]; > uint8x16_p

[Bug c++/87750] [8/9 Regression] Failed compilation / parsing of template member call after 'using' declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 45124 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45124&action=edit fix on top of the improved candidate patch This patchlet fixes the regressions in g++.dg/template/using{3,15,

[Bug preprocessor/88257] [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87750] [8/9 Regression] Failed compilation / parsing of template member call after 'using' declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva --- err... using{39,44}.C in g++.dg/lookup, actually. and using44.C is still broken, sorry

[Bug c++/88261] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r264147.

[Bug target/88096] wrong inline AVX512F optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88096 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/87750] [8/9 Regression] Failed compilation / parsing of template member call after 'using' declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva --- ... and it looks like lookup/using44.C really wants the USING_DECL from lookup_member; the function overloads are not template dependent, and as a result we perform overload resolution only among them, lea

[Bug target/88234] UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 29 14:23:21 2018 New Revision: 266619 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266619&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/88234 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_gimple_f

[Bug target/88234] UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far, queued for backports.

[Bug target/88152] optimize SSE & AVX char compares with subsequent movmskb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88152 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 29 14:32:00 2018 New Revision: 266620 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266620&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/88152 * tree.h (build_uniform_cst, uniform_integ

[Bug target/54700] Optimize away x<0 as mask argument of a blend.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 29 14:33:27 2018 New Revision: 266621 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266621&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/54700 * config/i386/sse.md (ssebytemode): Add V1

[Bug tree-optimization/88240] Potential optimization bug: invalid pre-load of floating-point value could cause SIGFPE-underflow if value is integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240 --- Comment #9 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Thomas De Schampheleire from comment #6) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5) > > This is QEMU with TCG, right? It could be an i387 emulation bug. > > I don't think so. Isn't it so t

[Bug target/54700] Optimize away x<0 as mask argument of a blend.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589

Hi All, We are able to fix the subjected issue with the peephole patterns (target specific) in the md file (attached the patch pr54589.patch). While testing the fix ,we end up with some of the C constructs like Testcase 1: #include struct param { int a, b, c, d; __m128i array[256]; }; void fun

[Bug libstdc++/88264] New: Support glibc-style tunables for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88264 Bug ID: 88264 Summary: Support glibc-style tunables for Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libstdc+

[Bug fortran/88265] New: [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 Bug ID: 88265 Summary: [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug libstdc++/88264] Support glibc-style tunables for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88264 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I forgot to list the growth factor for pool resource too (currently hardcoded to 2 in __pool_resource::_Pool::replenish())

[Bug fortran/88265] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz Target

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug c++/88266] New: nonsense warning about parentheses for comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88266 Bug ID: 88266 Summary: nonsense warning about parentheses for comparison Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Using cross-compiler I see following difference before and after my patch: _Z11find_a_fileP11path_prefixPKci: .LFB265: stmg%r7,%r15,56(%r15) .LCFI0: l %r12,8(%r2) lgr %

[Bug target/54589] struct offset add should be folded into address calculation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug fortran/88265] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #0) > Both test cases expect the assembly to contain a call to "_ZGVbN4v_sinf", > but what I see on my system is a call to "_ZGVdN8v_sinf". That was on a haswell mac

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- I found it, will send patch soon.

[Bug target/88207] [9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88207 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/88261] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- The ICE only affects C++. G++ 8 and prior accept the code with just a pedantic warning: $ cat pr88261.C && gcc -O2 -S -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic pr88261.C struct str { int len; char s[]; }; void foo() { str

[Bug ipa/87957] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in warn_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:1051 since r265519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Seen on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (32 and 64-bit, > gcc-testresults > reports also on aarch64-suse-linux-gnu, arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf, > s390x-ibm-linux-gnu default Also see

[Bug ipa/88231] aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org --- Comment

[Bug c++/87539] [8 Regression] internal compiler error when compiling project with Os optimization flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87539 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Summar

[Bug middle-end/86680] possible gcc optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86680 --- Comment #11 from Florian La Roche --- Below my current code that disables optimization for this one function and thus generates ok code length. best regards, Florian La Roche #if __GNUC__ > 4 #define __gcc_no_ivopts __attribute__ ((opt

[Bug target/54589] struct offset add should be folded into address calculation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/combine.c.jj2018-11-21 19:57:26.229726485 +0100 +++ gcc/combine.c 2018-11-29 17:57:48.069423874 +0100 @@ -4945,7 +4945,7 @@ find_split_point (rtx *loc, rtx_insn *in } /* If w

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 Scott Gayou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgayou at redhat dot com --- Comment #10 f

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Nov 29 17:17:39 2018 New Revision: 266631 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266631&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix thinko in transition to memop_ret type (PR middle-end/88246). 2018-11

[Bug middle-end/88246] Abort signal terminated program collect2 - munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/88267] New: A new flag in GCC causes a divergence in crtbegin.o file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88267 Bug ID: 88267 Summary: A new flag in GCC causes a divergence in crtbegin.o file Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/54589] struct offset add should be folded into address calculation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ipa/88231] aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- The feature already exists at -Os by default (i.e., all functions are by default minimally aligned). The suggestion here is only to let GCC minimize the amount of padding it adds to functions in order to alig

[Bug middle-end/88251] -Wformat-truncation=2 false alarms when compiling gzip, Emacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88251 eggert at cs dot ucla.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolutio

[Bug fortran/88265] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails when using --with-arch=...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/88265] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/simd-builtins-1.f90 fails when using --with-arch=...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88265 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/87751] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87751 --- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz --- Changed in gcc-9 between 2018 (ICE) and 20181118 (ok=error), presumably due to pr70260. $ gfortran-9-20181125 -c z1.f90 z1.f90:8:3: 8 |g = 1 | 1 Error: Illegal assignment to external pr

[Bug fortran/88268] New: Misleading extra warnings with -Wdo-subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88268 Bug ID: 88268 Summary: Misleading extra warnings with -Wdo-subscript Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug fortran/88269] New: ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88269 Bug ID: 88269 Summary: ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:947 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug c/88172] attribute aligned of zero silently accepted but ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88172 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Nov 29 17:48:58 2018 New Revision: 266633 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266633&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/88172 - attribute aligned of zero silently accepted but ignored PR te

[Bug testsuite/88208] new test case c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute-3.c in r266335 has multiple excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88208 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Nov 29 17:48:58 2018 New Revision: 266633 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266633&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/88172 - attribute aligned of zero silently accepted but ignored PR te

[Bug testsuite/88208] new test case c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute-3.c in r266335 has multiple excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88208 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >