[Bug rtl-optimization/87902] [9 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #7) > Apparently, for this specific case doing more of hard register copy > propagation is enough. I've just tried running pass_cprop_hardreg > before pass_thr

[Bug fortran/88229] New: ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229 Bug ID: 88229 Summary: ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/88229] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- This variant compiles and works : $ cat z3.f90 program p call s contains subroutine s character(:), allocatable :: y allocate (y, source=f('abcdefff')) print *, len(y), y

[Bug target/86735] [8/9 Regression] Bad wrong-code bug with "-march=skylake-avx512 -Ofast"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86735 --- Comment #33 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #30) > I have verified that the problem goes away when using the following as > version: > GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.31.51.20181124 Same ǵoes for the 2.30 bran

[Bug target/61976] aix64: Data corruption in struct passed by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61976 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45105 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45105&action=edit gcc9-pr86669.patch Indeed, it does. clone_body has code to unshare DECL_INITIAL, but it does so only for FOR_E

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #14) > Author: dmalcolm > Date: Tue Nov 27 16:04:31 2018 > New Revision: 266520 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266520&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > PR preproce

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #16 from Mike Gulick --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #15) > So can this be closed as FIXED now? Yes, fixed by r266516.

[Bug c++/87742] [7/8/9 Regression] false warning: array subscript 3 is above array bounds of 'const std::type_info* const [3]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87742 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug debug/87294] [8/9 Regression] dwarf-3 generation fails with ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87294 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/86593] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in based_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:14272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de --- C

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88103] [7/8/9 Regression] Wrong value category when conditional expression result is used as object expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/87157] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails starting with r263981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 27 19:23:39 2018 New Revision: 266524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266524&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/87157 * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel

[Bug middle-end/87157] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails starting with r263981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 Scott Gayou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgayou at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug target/88078] error: '__float128' was not declared in this scope on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88078 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > For GCC 8.2 using -std=c++14 instead of -std=gnu++14 will disable the > __float128 specializations, avoiding the problem of long double and > __float128 being

[Bug d/87864] libdruntime doesn't link with /bin/ld before Solaris 11.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 45106 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45106&action=edit Initial patch

[Bug fortran/88190] compile_options.allow_std does not allow to distinguish between GFC_STD_GNU and GFC_STD_LEGACY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I have been giving this some thought. After reading our current documentation > for -std= why do we all of a sudden change a policy because the reporter of > 88052 does not like something? Why not ju

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 --- Comment #3 from Scott Gayou --- My last comment was a bit confusing. I can reproduce 2/3 on a standard system, and the other 1/3 requires dropping ulimit -s down a bit. (to 4096).

[Bug d/87864] libdruntime doesn't link with /bin/ld before Solaris 11.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >>> --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- >>> Is there another way to get a section in earlier versions of S

[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Created attachment 45105 [details] > gcc9-pr86669.patch > > Indeed, it does. clone_body has code to unshare DECL_INITIAL, but it does > so only for FOR_EACH_LOCAL

[Bug c++/88184] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++2a: unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88184 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- -fchecking=2 is the answer.

[Bug c++/88181] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed (error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88181 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 27 21:04:41 2018 New Revision: 266527 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266527&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88181 * class.c (fixup_attribute_variants): Also pr

[Bug c++/88181] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed (error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88181 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [8/9 Regression] gcc-8.0.1 regression: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/88199] [7/8/9 Regression] memory leak on unordered container move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199 --- Comment #2 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Tue Nov 27 21:21:51 2018 New Revision: 266528 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266528&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-27 François Dumont PR libstdc++/88199 * in

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > Created attachment 45105 [details] > > gcc9-pr86669.patch > > I'll bootstrap/regtest the patch on x86_64-linux and i6

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > > Created attachment 45105 [details] > > > gcc9-pr86669.patch > > > > I

[Bug other/87695] Fehler beim Kompilieren für das Board Arduino/Genuino Mega or Mega 2560.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||al11 at lafcat dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug middle-end/88231] New: aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 Bug ID: 88231 Summary: aligned functions laid down inefficiently Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug ipa/88231] aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This shouldn't be too hard to solve. Reording based on alignment should be easy to be taken into account.

[Bug c++/88232] New: Please implement -Winfinite-recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232 Bug ID: 88232 Summary: Please implement -Winfinite-recursion Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/88232] Please implement -Winfinite-recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/88233] New: combine fails to merge insns leaving unneeded reg copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88233 Bug ID: 88233 Summary: combine fails to merge insns leaving unneeded reg copies Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug ipa/88231] aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I see that with -Os GCC already optimizes space by reducing the alignment of functions from the default 16 on i86 to 1 (in the absence of attribute aligned), so this would seem to be just a missed opportunity.

[Bug testsuite/80580] GIMPLEFE ICE on invalid code (fuzz testing)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80580 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Nov 27 23:25:56 2018 New Revision: 266533 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266533&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/67843 set shared_ptr lock policy at build-time This resolv

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #50 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Nov 27 23:25:56 2018 New Revision: 266533 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266533&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/67843 set shared_ptr lock policy at build-time This resolv

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #51 from postmas...@conky-be.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Oh no! What to do next? Well,

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #53 from postmas...@conky-be.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 45108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45108&action=edit attachment-117920-1.eml

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #52 from postmas...@conky-be.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next? Well, your

[Bug fortran/88227] ICE in gfc_convert_boz, at fortran/target-memory.c:788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Prior

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/88175] Showing header file instead of source code line for uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88175 --- Comment #13 from Jonny Grant --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > (In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #8) > > Do you agree this warning output should be changed to clarify? > > Yes, there's plenty of room to improve it. >

[Bug fortran/88228] ICE in check_null, at fortran/expr.c:2691

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88228 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Pri

[Bug fortran/88229] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88187] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++17: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88187 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 27 23:52:26 2018 New Revision: 266537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88187 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don't diagnose ded

[Bug c++/88187] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++17: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/88233] combine fails to merge insns leaving unneeded reg copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88233 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87742] [7/8/9 Regression] false warning: array subscript 3 is above array bounds of 'const std::type_info* const [3]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87742 --- Comment #4 from Liu Hao --- In my real-world example, 0) the enclosing function is indeterminately recursive, but there is no infinite loop, and 1) `o` has type `size_t`, which is a compile time constant because it is the index of a type in a

[Bug c++/72754] pointer to an unnamed struct with a sole flexible array member accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77572] wrong value for extended ASCII characters in diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77572 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > I still get the same output as Martin using recent trunk, and any older > versions. Ah, I see what happens, I get the same nonsensical output as Martin when I

[Bug c++/63392] poor error recovery with missing typename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63392 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4) > I've added a fix-it hint (for gcc 9), but I'm not planning to improve the > error-recovery at this time. "at this time" meaning maybe later?

[Bug testsuite/88208] new test case c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute-3.c in r266335 has multiple excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88208 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c/88172] attribute aligned of zero silently accepted but ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88172 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/88234] New: UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234 Bug ID: 88234 Summary: UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/88199] [7/8 Regression] memory leak on unordered container move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199 --- Comment #3 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Wed Nov 28 06:19:38 2018 New Revision: 266542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-28 François Dumont PR libstdc++/88199 * in

[Bug libstdc++/88199] [7/8 Regression] memory leak on unordered container move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199 --- Comment #4 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Wed Nov 28 06:27:28 2018 New Revision: 266543 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266543&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-28 François Dumont PR libstdc++/88199 * in

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 --- Comment #13 from Christian Hoff --- Hello Jonathan, that is great news! Thank you very much for fixing this issue, I really appreciate this. Best regards, Christian

[Bug c++/87571] [8/9 Regression] ICE in friend_accessible_p, accessing protected member of template friend inside template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87571 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2