[Bug fortran/78892] [7.0 Regression] no type conversion before coarray put

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78892 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #2 from G.

[Bug fortran/88206] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_type_spec, at fortran/match.c:2229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88206 Bug ID: 88206 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_type_spec, at fortran/match.c:2229 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/88055] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88055 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- See rs6000.c:validate_condition_mode. This is: r36191 (from 2000), original; r39610 (from 2001), -ffast-math; r40300 (from 2001), -funsafe-math-optimizations; r55904 (from 2002), -ffinite-math-only. S

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Robert J. Simpson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robert.simpson.lists@gmail.

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I'd suggest reviewing the set of files changed to see if any are generated files, or their sources (configure.ac, aclocal.m4, etc.), and doing a regeneration in that case.

[Bug target/88207] New: [9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88207 Bug ID: 88207 Summary: [9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c etc. FAIL Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/88207] [9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88207 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug fortran/88206] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_type_spec, at fortran/match.c:2229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88206 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Prior

[Bug c/57182] Documentation implies -fprofile-arcs required to create .text.unlikely sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57182 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 26 18:22:19 2018 New Revision: 266473 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266473&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-26 Sandra Loosemore PR c/57182 gc

[Bug c/57182] Documentation implies -fprofile-arcs required to create .text.unlikely sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57182 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/88184] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++2a: unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88184 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Interesting that on both my computers I see $ ./cc1plus -quiet 88184.C -std=c++2a 88184.C: In function ‘void g()’: 88184.C:10:12: error: no matching function for call to ‘f()’ 10 | f < T > (); |

[Bug testsuite/87486] [9 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c fails starting with r264335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87486 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug target/88207] [9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88207 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-*|i?86-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/88207] [9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88207 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #50 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Mon Nov 26 19:49:19 2018 New Revision: 266478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: darwin - backport r263763 to fix PR81033 2018-11-26 Iain Sandoe

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 --- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Mon Nov 26 19:49:19 2018 New Revision: 266478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: darwin - backport r263763 to fix PR81033 2018-11-26 Iain Sandoe

[Bug target/52795] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE on {x86_64,i386}-apple-darwin{10,11} at -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52795 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Mon Nov 26 19:49:19 2018 New Revision: 266478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: darwin - backport r263763 to fix PR81033 2018-11-26 Iain Sandoe

[Bug testsuite/88208] New: new test case c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute-3.c in r266335 has multiple excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88208 Bug ID: 88208 Summary: new test case c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute-3.c in r266335 has multiple excess errors Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/88209] New: Inefficient array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88209 Bug ID: 88209 Summary: Inefficient array initialization Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug middle-end/88209] Inefficient array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88209 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug target/88178] [9 Regression] ICE in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:13659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88178 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Nov 26 20:50:57 2018 New Revision: 266480 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266480&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/88178 * config/i386/i386.c (dbx_register

[Bug target/88178] [9 Regression] ICE in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:13659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88178 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|x86 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/88178] [9 Regression] ICE in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:13659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88178 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- Fixed for gcc-9, no backports planned.

[Bug c++/88210] New: Add fix-it hint for explicit template instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88210 Bug ID: 88210 Summary: Add fix-it hint for explicit template instantiations Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/88210] Add fix-it hint for explicit template instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88210 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Even without a fix-it, "has not been declared" would be more helpful than "is not a template". Clang is more informative (although wrong about the instantiation needing to occur in namespace x): expl.cc:

[Bug preprocessor/58397] Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Nov 26 21:21:16 2018 New Revision: 266484 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266484&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/58397 * config.host (*-*-netbsd*): Use x-netbsd a

[Bug preprocessor/58370] pre compiled headers failure on NetBSD/sparc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58370 Bug 58370 depends on bug 58397, which changed state. Bug 58397 Summary: Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug preprocessor/58397] Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/86900] [8/9 Regression] -gdwarf-5 -O2 -ffunction-sections = assembler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86900 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 26 21:24:00 2018 New Revision: 266485 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266485&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86900 * dwarf2out.c (secname_for_decl): For functio

[Bug testsuite/88090] [9 regression] obj-c++.dg/attributes/method-nonnull-1.mm FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88090 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 26 21:25:22 2018 New Revision: 266486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266486&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/88090 * obj-c++.dg/attributes/method-nonnull-

[Bug target/88195] misleading error message for unsupported builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88195 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 26 21:26:19 2018 New Revision: 266487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/88195 * config/i386/i386.c (def_builtin2): If tc

[Bug target/88207] [9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88207 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you for reporting it. I've started to work on the PR. I'll keep you informed about the progress.

[Bug libstdc++/86756] Don't define __cpp_lib_filesystem unless --enable-libstdcxx-filesystem-ts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86756 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug libstdc++/71044] Optimize std::filesystem implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71044 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/52795] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE on {x86_64,i386}-apple-darwin{10,11} at -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52795 --- Comment #15 from Mike Stump --- Can the bug be marked as resolved? :-)

[Bug middle-end/87836] ICE in cc1 for gcc-6.5.0 with SPARC hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836 --- Comment #20 from Gary Mills --- For a test, I defined the symbol DEBUG_ET in gcc-7.3.0/gcc/et-forest.c . During the build, I got this ICE and a backtrace: /export/home/mills/Downloads/code/oi-userland/components/developer/gcc-7/build/sparcv

[Bug driver/78206] bootstrap failure under Apple sandbox that blacklists reads in /usr/local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/80953] Support libsanitizer on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- > This is weird: this test PASSes for me on Solaris 11.3, 11.4 and 11.5, > both 32 and 64-bit, as and gas. A more useful backtrace just before the crash: (gdb) bt #0 0xfe8d9080 in free () from /home/bo

[Bug sanitizer/80953] Support libsanitizer on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- > The only asan execution failures I see on Solaris 11/SPARC are > > c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c > c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-2.c > c-c++-common/asan/pointer-subtract-1.c > c-c++-c

[Bug c++/88120] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in contains_placeholder_p at gcc/tree.c:3710

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88120 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Nov 26 23:26:40 2018 New Revision: 266492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266492&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88120 - ICE when calling save_expr in a template.

[Bug c++/88120] [7/8 Regression] ICE in contains_placeholder_p at gcc/tree.c:3710

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88120 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/88211] New: missing warning on printf %ls and unterminated wide member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88211 Bug ID: 88211 Summary: missing warning on printf %ls and unterminated wide member array Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/88211] missing warning on printf %ls and unterminated wide member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88211 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/87756] missing unterminated argument warning using address of a constant character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87756 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Nov 26 23:55:36 2018 New Revision: 266494 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266494&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 87756 - missing unterminated argument warning using address of a consta

[Bug testsuite/88208] new test case c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute-3.c in r266335 has multiple excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88208 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88210] Add fix-it hint for explicit template instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88210 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 --- Comment #31 from Christian Häggström --- What you describe Sandra is mentioned in the man page for longjmp(3). Maybe we can steal some of its documentation. Caveats If the function which called setjmp() returns before longjmp

[Bug fortran/88190] compile_options.allow_std does not allow to distinguish between GFC_STD_GNU and GFC_STD_LEGACY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #0) > While playing with pr88052 I have found that the value of > compile_options.allow_std passed to libgfortran is the same (4095) when > compiling with -std=g

[Bug rtl-optimization/88212] New: IRA Register Coalescing not working for the testcase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88212 Bug ID: 88212 Summary: IRA Register Coalescing not working for the testcase Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug rtl-optimization/88212] IRA Register Coalescing not working for the testcase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88212 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, ra --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/88213] New: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88213 Bug ID: 88213 Summary: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

<    1   2