https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 40196, which changed state.
Bug 40196 Summary: [F03] [F08] Type parameter inquiry (str%len, a%kind) and
Complex parts (z%re, z%im)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 40196, which changed state.
Bug 40196 Summary: [F03] [F08] Type parameter inquiry (str%len, a%kind) and
Complex parts (z%re, z%im)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962
Bug 29962 depends on bug 40196, which changed state.
Bug 40196 Summary: [F03] [F08] Type parameter inquiry (str%len, a%kind) and
Complex parts (z%re, z%im)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88089
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 20 08:04:26 2018
New Revision: 266300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-20 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/88089
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82077
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82024
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Segher: Will you do the backport?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88087
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 20 08:06:09 2018
New Revision: 266301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88087
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81887
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81697
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Maxim, Slava: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81603
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81432
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
David: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.0
Summary|[7/8 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81420
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Jakub: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Paul: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81697
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84335
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Jakub: Can you please update Known to work or close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84488
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84331
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Julia, H.J. : Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84307
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Jakub: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88090
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45037
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45037&action=edit
gcc9-pr88090.patch
Untested fix. Rainer, does this fix the issue for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84288
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84292
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81887
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Richi: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84123
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84250
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Maxim, Jakub: Can the bug be marked as resolved? Or at least update Known to
work?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84114
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> Iain: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
I'd assume it can
Rainer: have you done a build on the affected system(s) since the back port to
8?
(technically the iss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84307
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
Richi, Honza: Do we want to then close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84039
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #12)
> Note that such issues are not unique to ctan.
>
> E.g., compiling __builtin_jn (10, 1e10) will produce such a hang.
> The difference is th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Richi: Will you backport or do we close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #13)
> MPFR deals with larger exponent ranges for intermediate computations
> itself (MPFR functions generally set the maximum possible exponent range
> i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Jakub: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84828
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Jakub: Can the bug be marked as resolved? Or planning to backport that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84648
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84838
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84783
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69298
--- Comment #7 from matthew.hambley at metoffice dot gov.uk ---
A recent migration to RHEL7 seems to have exacerbated this issue.
Previously it could be worked around by ensuring that a type with user
finaliser appeared before the array of finali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85769
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Tamar: Can you please update Known to work or close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86270
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Martin: Can you please update Known to work?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
Richard: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85590
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85463
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86068
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84783
Sebastian Peryt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87075
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86575
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87374
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Thomas: Can you please update Known to work?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87486
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87081
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87439
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86481
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> Richi: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
I just re-opened it so why would you think so?!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86863
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87439
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
David: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86571
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
I'm going to backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87151
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
H.J. I can write a patch for it. Do you expect more expensive costs when
retpolines are enabled?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
I will backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Richi: Can the bug be marked as resolved? Or please update Known to work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Probably, unless the maintainers that committed the fixes want to commit
something further.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86661
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Paolo: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo