https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40503
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I was not attempting to confirm that GCC had a particular bug.
In this case: as I said, no excess precision support is hooked up for
decimal floating point (i.e., whatever the back end doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83353
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
asin(sin(a)) is not safe (or at least not simple) because of arguments
outside [-pi/2, pi/2]. sin(asin(a)) is more appropriate with -ffast-math
because arguments outside [-1,1] are exclude
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87869
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81679
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4)
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > If there is a concern that the attribute could be used on declarations in
> > existing code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78760
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo