[Bug middle-end/87757] weird underlining and colors in sprintf warnings for unterminated arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87757 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87801] [9 Regression] CPU2006 454.calculix failed to build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87801 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/87785] [9 Regression] ICE in dr_misalignment, at tree-vectorizer.h:1245 on 454.calculix with -Ofast and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87785 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/87800] [9 Regression] CPU2006 416.gamess failed to build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87793] [8/9 Regression] GCC reports error when compiling with "-fpic -Os -g"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87793 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/87803] GCC 6.5.0 release directory is misnamed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87803 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug web/87803] GCC 6.5.0 release directory is misnamed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87803 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfortunately the GNU ftp uploading directives don't allow to rename a directory. I've mailed the administrator.

[Bug web/87803] GCC 6.5.0 release directory is misnamed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87803 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87803 > > --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Unfortunately the GNU ftp uploading directiv

[Bug web/87803] GCC 6.5.0 release directory is misnamed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87803 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/44646] [F08] Implement DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig --- I've changed the entry in the table to PR78219; the KIND specification in the forall index is still missing. so yellow is appropriate.

[Bug fortran/83064] DO CONCURRENT and auto-parallelization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Commen

[Bug fortran/87804] New: Omp simd loop with sin calls not vectorized when inside omp parallel region and the sin parameter uses value from shared array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87804 Bug ID: 87804 Summary: Omp simd loop with sin calls not vectorized when inside omp parallel region and the sin parameter uses value from shared array Product: gcc

[Bug c++/87805] New: Incomplete diagnostic for -Wnoexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87805 Bug ID: 87805 Summary: Incomplete diagnostic for -Wnoexcept Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/87805] Incomplete diagnostic for -Wnoexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87805 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/87806] New: Option -Wall should warn about unused structs, typdefs, enums, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806 Bug ID: 87806 Summary: Option -Wall should warn about unused structs, typdefs, enums, etc Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/87806] Option -Wall should warn about unused structs, typdefs, enums, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806 --- Comment #1 from Ulrich Windl --- This is an enhancement request (cant't set it in Bugzilla)

[Bug target/87807] New: Passing float, double vectors as variadic args fails on sparcv9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87807 Bug ID: 87807 Summary: Passing float, double vectors as variadic args fails on sparcv9 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/65832] Inefficient vector construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832 Bug 65832 depends on bug 79745, which changed state. Bug 79745 Summary: vec_init<> expander misses V2TImode with AVX and V2OImode and V2TImode with AVX512 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79745 What|Removed

[Bug target/79745] vec_init<> expander misses V2TImode with AVX and V2OImode and V2TImode with AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79745 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/87806] Option -Wall should warn about unused structs, typdefs, enums, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Jonath

[Bug c/87806] Option -Wall should warn about unused structs, typdefs, enums, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Ulrich Windl from comment #0) > BTW: With having option -Wmissing-field-initializers I could even imagine to > warn about single fields that are never used. Again, this seems like a bad idea.

[Bug middle-end/65832] Inefficient vector construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener

[Bug jit/87808] New: gcc_lib_dir is missing from libgccjit's search path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87808 Bug ID: 87808 Summary: gcc_lib_dir is missing from libgccjit's search path Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug jit/87808] gcc_lib_dir is missing from libgccjit's search path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87808 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- it looks like the code can run without the external driver, but it cannot find the needed files in the install location.

[Bug tree-optimization/58497] SLP vectorizes identical operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58497 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|rguenth at gcc d

[Bug tree-optimization/85283] Generates 20 lines of assembly while only one assembly instruction is enough.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85283 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- We can vectorize a variant with doubles but that results in awful code because the ABI isn't known. The float variant now looks like the following before vectorization: _1 = a.x; _2 = b.x; _3 = _1 +

[Bug target/87330] ICE in scan_rtx_reg, at regrename.c:1097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87330 --- Comment #8 from sameerad at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sameerad Date: Tue Oct 30 10:59:37 2018 New Revision: 265618 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265618&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fixes bug 87330 by invoking df_note_add_problem to recomp

[Bug fortran/87804] Omp simd loop with sin calls not vectorized when inside omp parallel region and the sin parameter uses value from shared array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87804 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58372] internal compiler error: ix86_compute_frame_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xuepeng.guo at intel dot com --- Comment #19 f

[Bug tree-optimization/87800] [9 Regression] CPU2006 416.gamess failed to build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87800 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Oct 30 11:27:32 2018 New Revision: 265619 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265619&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-10-30 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/87800

[Bug tree-optimization/87800] [9 Regression] CPU2006 416.gamess failed to build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87804] Omp simd loop with sin calls not vectorized when inside omp parallel region and the sin parameter uses value from shared array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87804 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Ondračka --- Wow, yeah that works, thank you so much. It's not very clear from your explanation if this is a bug or not after all... Feel free to close the bug if the omission of pure was a mistake on my end.

[Bug bootstrap/87747] [9 regression] Bootstrap failure if using gcc-4.6 as stage1 compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87747 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Tue Oct 30 11:33:24 2018 New Revision: 265620 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265620&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't allow the pool allocator to be configured to allocate zero-siz

[Bug libstdc++/87809] New: Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 Bug ID: 87809 Summary: Can't create empty std::optional> Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c++/58372] internal compiler error: ix86_compute_frame_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug go/87810] New: go-test.exp needs an update for non-existing test exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87810 Bug ID: 87810 Summary: go-test.exp needs an update for non-existing test exceptions Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/58372] internal compiler error: ix86_compute_frame_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372 --- Comment #21 from xuepeng guo --- Thanks for fix. I am glad to help to test it out.

[Bug c/87811] New: [9 Regression] ICE with __builtin_expect_with_probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87811 Bug ID: 87811 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE with __builtin_expect_with_probability Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c/87811] [9 Regression] ICE with __builtin_expect_with_probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Bah. Can you please attach preprocessed source and provide command-line flags? A simple cc1plus cross isn't enough it seems and I do not have a cross glibc to build a full cross.

[Bug testsuite/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |testsuite --- Comment #3 from Richard B

[Bug fortran/87804] Omp simd loop with sin calls not vectorized when inside omp parallel region and the sin parameter uses value from shared array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87804 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/87811] [9 Regression] ICE with __builtin_expect_with_probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87811 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/87809] [9 Regression] Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/87809] [9 Regression] Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- It affects other containers too: #include #include #include template struct Alloc { using value_type = T; T* allocate(unsigned n); void deallocate(T* p, unsigned n); Alloc(int) { } temp

[Bug libstdc++/87809] [8/9 Regression] Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|8.2.0 |7.3.0 Target Milestone|9.0

[Bug target/87812] New: X86-64 Vector __m256 return ABI needs clarification (discrepancy between implementations).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87812 Bug ID: 87812 Summary: X86-64 Vector __m256 return ABI needs clarification (discrepancy between implementations). Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58372] internal compiler error: ix86_compute_frame_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372 --- Comment #22 from xuepeng guo --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #20) > Created attachment 44928 [details] > Proposed patch > > It turned out that functions, called directly through emit_library_call (as > the above testcase, which bui

[Bug testsuite/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44929 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44929&action=edit assembler

[Bug testsuite/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44930 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44930&action=edit intermediate text

[Bug testsuite/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44931 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44931&action=edit preprocessed source

[Bug testsuite/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Various output files attached and here's a run with -v so you can see all the options: seurer@granola:~/gcc/build/gcc-test$ /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ -v -B/home/

[Bug middle-end/87813] New: sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813 Bug ID: 87813 Summary: sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/87813] sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,

[Bug middle-end/87813] sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Ah, ok. /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc:98:1: missed: not vectorized: bad data alignment in basic block. looks like with the flags we do not support unaligned accesses.

[Bug middle-end/87813] sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Why is the sprintf pass (-fprintf-return-value) even enabled at -O0?

[Bug middle-end/87813] sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Why is the sprintf pass (-fprintf-return-value) even enabled at -O0? Well, at -Og, but isn't that kinda sort-of the same thing?

[Bug testsuite/87802] [9 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr87105.cc fails starting with r265522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87802 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, it works with that patch.

[Bug target/87812] X86-64 Vector __m256 return ABI needs clarification (discrepancy between implementations).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87812 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Without AVX, GCC treats typedef qi __attribute__((vector_size (32))) v32qi; as a type of 32 bytes, which is passed in memory. Clang does # clang -S -msse2 x.c -O2 ... movaps .LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0 # x

[Bug libstdc++/87809] [8/9 Regression] Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Oct 30 14:49:43 2018 New Revision: 265626 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265626&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87809 avoid invalid expressions in exception specifications

[Bug libstdc++/87784] A bug in tr2::dynamic_bitset::find_first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87784 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Oct 30 14:49:32 2018 New Revision: 265625 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265625&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87784 fix dynamic_bitset::push_back Previously the _M_Nb me

[Bug libstdc++/87784] A bug in tr2::dynamic_bitset::find_first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87784 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85593] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/85855] [7/8/9 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/85870] [7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/85925] [7/8/9 regression] Mis-compilation at -02, masking with 257 goes wrong in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/86485] [7/8/9 Regression] "anonymous" maybe-uninitialized false positive with ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86485 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Blocks|

[Bug target/86487] [7/8/9 Regression] insn does not satisfy its constraints on arm big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86487 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/86569] [7/8 Regression] -Wnonnull-compare affects code generation since r233684

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86569 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/86575] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wimplicit-fallthrough affects code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/86823] [7/8/9 Regression] private member template struct/class is publicly accessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/87812] X86-64 Vector __m256 return ABI needs clarification (discrepancy between implementations).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87812 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86905] [7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_cgraph_node failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86905 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/86944] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:6878 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86944 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/86988] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:5563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86988 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/87047] [7/8/9 Regression] performance regression because of if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87047 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority|

[Bug tree-optimization/86944] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:6878 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86944 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I cannot reproduce this on trunk.

[Bug c++/87072] [7 Regression] g++6.2.0 false warning: array subscript is above array bounds, with misleading line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87072 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/87145] [7/8/9 Regression] Implicit conversion to scoped enum fails: "error: taking address of temporary/rvalue"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87145 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libitm/86293] unused variable left over (used in assert) when building with -g0 -DNDEBUG [-Werror=unused-variable]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86293 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/87148] [7/8/9 Regression] backward compatibility issue to take char [] as incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87148 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/87809] [8/9 Regression] Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/87809] [8/9 Regression] Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/87246] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87246 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/87430] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in fortran/trans-types.c:1157

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87430 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/87541] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE using a constant decl as an attribute alloc_size argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87541 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/87814] New: [9 Regression] ICE in in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15962 with range-v3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814 Bug ID: 87814 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15962 with range-v3 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/87148] [7/8/9 Regression] backward compatibility issue to take char [] as incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87148 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug c++/87542] [7/8/9 Regression] bogus error on attribute format with a named constant argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87542 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/87812] X86-64 Vector __m256 return ABI needs clarification (discrepancy between implementations).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87812 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Without AVX, v32qi should be passed the same way before AVX was added to compiler. For example, [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 tmp]$ cat z.c typedef int __attribute__((mode(SI))) si; typedef si __attribute__((vector_size (128)))

[Bug middle-end/87647] [7/8 Regression] ICE on valid code in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87647 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug libstdc++/87787] [9 Regression] runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87787 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2018-10-29 00:0

[Bug target/87702] [7/8/9 Regression] Segfault in glibc if compiled with -march=amdfam10 -O2 (x86)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/86944] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:6878 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86944 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/87813] sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- The sprintf pass doesn't do any optimization at -O0 but it still runs to diagnose the subset of mistakes that are detectable even without optimization. For instance, the buffer overflow due to the off-by-one

[Bug target/87330] ICE in scan_rtx_reg, at regrename.c:1097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87330 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87812] X86-64 Vector __m256 return ABI needs clarification (discrepancy between implementations).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87812 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > Without AVX, v32qi should be passed the same way before AVX was > added to compiler. For example, > > If there were AVX1024, GCC would pass y in vector register. When

  1   2   >