https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641
--- Comment #8 from Frederic Jardon ---
Thank you for the fast response :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633
--- Comment #6 from Yury Gribov ---
Seems isl bootstrap is broken in trunk:
/home/yugr/src/gcc-87633-ref/isl/isl_tab_pip.c: In function
‘isl_tab_basic_set_non_trivial_lexmin’:
/home/yugr/src/gcc-87633-ref/isl/isl_tab_pip.c:5087:21: internal compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov ---
Problem seems to be in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, in
/* Build the bounds. */
combine_bound (code, wmin, min_ovf, expr_type, min_op0, min_op1);
min_op0 is NULL_TREE which causes set_v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87596
--- Comment #6 from iii at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: iii
Date: Fri Oct 19 08:33:52 2018
New Revision: 265306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
lra: fix spill_hard_reg_in_range clobber check
FROM..TO range might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72782
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Oct 19 09:13:34 2018
New Revision: 265311
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265311&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Enable AVX512 memory broadcast for FP add
Many AVX512 vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87653
Bug ID: 87653
Summary: Calling null pointer in multi-threaded applications
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chunhualiao at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87654
Bug ID: 87654
Summary: Information about constants from condition is not
propagated
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Note that most of the variants seem to be handled fine, e.g. the following
seems to work; all variants output: 5 and 7.
The issue seems to also relate to having the the "parameter..." in the parent
scope.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87655
Bug ID: 87655
Summary: `i = i % constant` for static local `i` is not
optimized
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
Bug ID: 87656
Summary: Useful flags to enable with -Wall or -Wextra
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87649
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 44857
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44857&action=edit
gcc9-pr87649.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.3
Summary|inner class with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
Bug ID: 87657
Summary: [9 Regression] SLP ICE in libgfortran
matmul_i2_vanilla
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87647
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #34 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #32)
> I would prefer a function template instead of the LF macro e.g.
That will lose the __LINE__ information from the supposed error message in
VERIFY, i.e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
This looks like it could be due to
2018-10-18 Richard Biener
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_builtin_vectorization_cost): Do not
feed width-specific load/store costs throu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #35 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #34)
> Can I at least change
> - reinterpret_cast(-__alignof(_M_i)));
> + reinterpret_cast(-_S_alignment));
> ?
Yes, OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87645
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Backporting that change helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Not that word_mode vectorization costing in the backend is in any way
correct...
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 9a5b54978a9..f542a1b494f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If CC:ing me on a bug, please always state the specific question on which
you want an opinion; don't CC me simply because I maintain the relevant
part of the compiler (I read gcc-bugs) or b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87653
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 44860
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44860&action=edit
Possible patch
I can't recreate the problem. Your test program runs fine on my system, once I
add a main fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> Not that word_mode vectorization costing in the backend is in any way
> correct...
With that patch, the i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap completed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87520
--- Comment #3 from Axel Naumann ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> A possible (partial) fix would be:
>
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
I can confirm that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87566
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
If I don't take it, I will lose it!
Cheers
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86268
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86148
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #3)
> Paul, it is not my example, it was posted by Alberto Fco. Martín-Huertas in
> December 2015 on c.l.f., and you commented at that time that you were
> contemplating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87645
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 19 14:26:35 2018
New Revision: 265315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-19 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/87645
Backp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 19 14:27:57 2018
New Revision: 265316
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265316&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-19 Richard Biener
PR target/87657
* config/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87645
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 19 14:28:43 2018
New Revision: 265317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-19 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/87645
* gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983
--- Comment #9 from Jürgen Reuter ---
This reads that this bug/regression has been fixed on version 8 (and therewith
presumably 9), but just not backported to version 7. Correct?
For the actual trunk and OpenCoarrays 2.1 everything works for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter ---
It appears that the link to this PR shall replace the link to PR4646 at the
Fortran2008 wiki status page: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2008Status
The PR44646 (feature request) is closed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219
--- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #5)
> It appears that the link to this PR shall replace the link to PR4646 at the
> Fortran2008 wiki status page: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2008Status
> The PR446
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7)
> If CC:ing me on a bug, please always state the specific question on which
> you want an opinion; don't CC me simply because I maintain the relevant
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think it would be appropriate for the front end to generate something
for return ; that avoids this warning. I don't know whether
that should be a literal return of error_mark_node, or a
Hi,
How about targeting customer base of QAD and SAP Users for your Marketing
and sales needs? Please let me know.
This file includes- Company name, Website, Contact name (First, Middle,
Last), Title, Direct email address, Phone, Postal address, Industry, SIC
codes, Employee size, Revenue s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 44861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44861&action=edit
untested patch by Richard Biener
As part of the discussion here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87658
Bug ID: 87658
Summary: Cannot use move ctor when inserting to std::map
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Oct 19 18:28:11 2018
New Revision: 265319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-10-19 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/87473
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87658
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
Carl Eugen Hoyos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cehoyos at ag dot or.at
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880
--- Comment #9 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Not quite fixed. The lhs character length doesn't get set and so it
fails at runtime. I will commit the patch as 'obvious'.
Paul
2018-10-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/71880
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87658
--- Comment #2 from Filip Gawin ---
(In reply to ensadc from comment #1)
> > dynamicParts[mf->getName()] = std::move(part);
>
> operator[] calls the default constructor of the mapped_type (which seems to
> be `VehicleObject::Part` in this case),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87658
--- Comment #3 from Filip Gawin ---
Ops, messed code.
But you can see that interesting part via link, on github.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87659
Bug ID: 87659
Summary: Memory corruption in array component of intent(in)
unlimited polymorphic with optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87659
--- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson ---
In initial comment, I meant to write "... bug disappears if the pointer intent
is switched to intent(inout)..."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87658
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||filip.gawin at zoho dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87656
--- Comment #12 from Manuel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87656
--- Comment #23 from Manuel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
From: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DiagnosticsGuidelines
As a rough guideline, a warning option should be:
enabled by default if it has (almost) no false positives (e.g.,
-Woverflow);
added to -W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Fixed for trunk. Backports coming next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87659
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85488
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 19 22:52:06 2018
New Revision: 265335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85488
PR middle-end/87649
* omp-low.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87649
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 19 22:52:06 2018
New Revision: 265335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85488
PR middle-end/87649
* omp-low.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87656
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87656
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64, powerpc64le|aarch64, powerpc*-*-*
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65254
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78380
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Ryan Schmidt from comment #9)
> I am also encountering this problem on i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 when compiling
> texlive-bin 20170604 with gcc 6.4.0, though in my case it's -Os not -Ofast:
>
> li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87660
Bug ID: 87660
Summary: Fail to compile unique_ptr of incomplete tyoe
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009
--- Comment #12 from Ryan Schmidt ---
How would I do that?
83 matches
Mail list logo
