https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Bug ID: 87475
Summary: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1275
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
>
> Is there information on why Clang implemented those two options, was there
> significant demand for those kinds specifically?
I don't know, I just copied that as I saw it in LLVM's release notes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
--- Comment #20 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Repeating Dominique's question: this seems complete (or almost complete). Is
there anything left? This is one of the last three non-green items in
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2003Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87474
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87474
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> Confirmed from GCC 8 onwards. Looks like a modulo scheduling bug?
I guess so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87472
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84039
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87373
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Great, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Bug ID: 87476
Summary: [9 Regression] char-array initialized from wide-string
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87442
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug ID: 87477
Summary: [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE
statement
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87261
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 1 11:25:45 2018
New Revision: 264744
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264744&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-01 MCC CS
PR tree-optimization/87261
* match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41599
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44044
Bug 44044 depends on bug 38936, which changed state.
Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 38936, which changed state.
Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 38936, which changed state.
Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
Bug ID: 87478
Summary: Hidden member function falsely takes part in qualified
name lookup
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70792
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matthijs van Duin from comment #4)
> It seems bug 51253 previously addressed this, which means this is a
> regression.
No. To be a regression it has to have previously worked, then stopped wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's no regression (see bug 70792 comment 5).
G++ still warns for the testcasese here, even though it produces the right code
now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87479
Bug ID: 87479
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr63527.c
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70792
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-24 00:00:00 |2018-10-1
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:53:34 2018
New Revision: 264748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
stack-clash: Add LR assert to layout_frame.
Since stack clash depend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:56:40 2018
New Revision: 264749
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264749&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add support for SVE stack clash probing.
This patch adds basic suppo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:58:21 2018
New Revision: 264750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a hook to support telling the mid-end when to probe the stack.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:00:58 2018
New Revision: 264751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ensure that outgoing argument size is at least 8 bytes when alloca an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:02:21 2018
New Revision: 264752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Allow setting of stack-clash via configure options.
This patch defin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:03:31 2018
New Revision: 264753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264753&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Set default values for stack-clash and do basic validation in back-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:05:30 2018
New Revision: 264754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cleanup the AArch64 testsuite when stack-clash is on.
This patch cle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
So is this fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87465
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87465
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:10:48 2018
New Revision: 264758
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84191
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87469
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:49:35 2018
New Revision: 264747
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264747&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Updated stack-clash implementation supporting 64k probes.
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Confirmed, not a regression. Reduced:
template struct is_int { };
template<> struct is_int { using type = void; };
class MyTag {};
template struct is_tag { };
template<> struct is_tag { using type = void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87474
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70792
--- Comment #7 from Matthijs van Duin ---
Ah! I should have checked the actual tests of 51253 before calling it a
regression, apologies. I just kinda assumed that these simple cases would be
covered by the work done back then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87474
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc |powerpc*-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87479
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87366
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Bug ID: 87480
Summary: SFINAE constructor not matched, only in templated
function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Bug ID: 87481
Summary: Endless loop with optimisation in C++17
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.3
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 1 14:27:17 2018
New Revision: 264759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264759&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/65677
* trans-expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Reproduces on trunk for powerpc64le-linux-gnu also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
Bug ID: 87482
Summary: Clarify behaviour of resolvers with parameters in for
__attribute__((ifunc))
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">Hi,
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">Hope this note finds you
well.
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">Are you in the market to target AWS/Azure
users for your lead generation and mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
Author: carll
Date: Mon Oct 1 15:57:13 2018
New Revision: 264764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Update, forgot to put the PR number in the Change Log.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Carl Love ---
Cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Yes, on some platforms the resolver takes the HWCAP as an argument and so
should be declared as a function taking that argument (if it uses it,
anyway).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Ah, I see where the problem is.
Consider the test case
module zero
implicit none
contains
subroutine foo(a)
real, contiguous :: a(:,:)
print *,a
end subroutine foo
subroutine bar(a)
real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85948
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
Great work Manuel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87483
Bug ID: 87483
Summary: attribute alias accepted on a symbol definition
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> Related test case by the bug reporterm
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/
> UvBX1kfuFqs
>
>
> This time rejectin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52357
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38629
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26190
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66074
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
Olivier Kannengieser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||okannen at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64525
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87483
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26190
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
I haven't done any further work on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87484
Bug ID: 87484
Summary: internal compiler error: in dwf_regno, at
dwarf2cfi.c:909
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One can get around the error with a patch like this:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index a2beb7fc90a..6b6e34c0d86 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Actually the patch is better expressed as:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index a2beb7fc90a..4710b7d2975 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26190
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #5)
> I haven't done any further work on this.
The reason I was asking was because this bug shows up in my search of bugs with
an assignee but that aren't marked as ASSIG
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
