[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug bootstrap/87134] [9 regression] SEGV in cc1 caused by r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134 > > --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> -

[Bug bootstrap/87134] [9 regression] SEGV in cc1 caused by r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- [...] >> > What's your host compiler? Do you use custom STAGE1_CFLAGS? >> >> Just a vanilla i386-pc-solaris2.11 gcc 7.1.0. Nothing s

[Bug middle-end/87138] [8/9 Regression] wrong code with TI multiplication with -O -march=k8 -fno-tree-fre -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87138 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 31 07:49:12 2018 New Revision: 264009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264009&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/87138 * expmed.c (expand_mult_const): Use im

[Bug tree-optimization/86816] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree-ssa-pre / tail_merge_optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 31 08:33:14 2018 New Revision: 264010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264010&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug middle-end/86505] [6/7/8 Regression] __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() computes the number of arguments wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 31 08:33:14 2018 New Revision: 264010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264010&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug debug/86456] [8 Regression] Segfault in switch_to_section at gcc/varasm.c:7353 since r259317

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 31 08:33:14 2018 New Revision: 264010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264010&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug ipa/87024] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in fold_stmt_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87024 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 31 08:33:14 2018 New Revision: 264010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264010&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/86945] [8 Regression] BUG with optimisation of select case statement in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86945 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 31 08:33:14 2018 New Revision: 264010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264010&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/86927] [8 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86927 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 31 08:33:14 2018 New Revision: 264010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264010&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug debug/86456] [8 Regression] Segfault in switch_to_section at gcc/varasm.c:7353 since r259317

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/86816] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree-ssa-pre / tail_merge_optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/86927] [8 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86927 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/86945] [8 Regression] BUG with optimisation of select case statement in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86945 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug bootstrap/87134] [9 regression] SEGV in cc1 caused by r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE > Hmm, GCC 7.1.0 of course makes me raise eyebrows. Do you by chance >> have another host compiler to cross-test whether it's a h

[Bug target/86684] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86684 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 31 08:52:13 2018 New Revision: 264011 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264011&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Make lrounddi2 depend on TARGET_FPRND (PR86684) TARGET_FPR

[Bug target/87149] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87149 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 31 08:52:13 2018 New Revision: 264011 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264011&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Make lrounddi2 depend on TARGET_FPRND (PR86684) TARGET_FPRN

[Bug target/87133] ICE in aggregate_value_p with -frounding-math on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87133 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug target/87163] New: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163 Bug ID: 87163 Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/87164] New: ICE in output_1236, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3236

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87164 Bug ID: 87164 Summary: ICE in output_1236, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3236 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/87162] [6.2.0] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87162 --- Comment #2 from Wen Yang --- 0x8837da lhd_decl_printable_name(tree_node*, int) ../../gcc-6.2.0/gcc/langhooks.c:222 0x883a36 lhd_print_error_function(diagnostic_context*, char const*, diagnostic_info*) ../../gcc-6.2.0/gcc/langh

[Bug c++/87165] New: Did you mean hints candidates equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87165 Bug ID: 87165 Summary: Did you mean hints candidates equality Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/87165] Did you mean hints candidates equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87165 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/87165] Did you mean hints candidates equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87165 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/87162] [6.2.0] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug c++/87161] if -Werror appear after -Wmissing-prototypes the warning is not turn into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87161 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug gcov-profile/83877] Make gcov accept a path to the gcda and a path to the gcno file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83877 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- I see your use case but as mentioned I don't want to do gcov over complex about locations. Hope you can live with the symlink creation.

[Bug middle-end/87157] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails starting with r263981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Component|

[Bug target/87156] [9 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ for mips64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87156 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/87164] ICE in output_1236, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3236

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87164 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87163] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- /usr/bin/powerpc64le-suse-linux-as --version GNU assembler (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Tumbleweed) 2.31 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it unde

[Bug target/87160] Maybe miscompilation of a polyhedron test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87160 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87164] ICE in output_1236, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3236

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87164 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Caused by r263614.

[Bug target/87164] ICE in output_1236, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3236

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87164 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/87166] New: 454.calculix benchmark is much slower on -Ofast with PGO or LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87166 Bug ID: 87166 Summary: 454.calculix benchmark is much slower on -Ofast with PGO or LTO Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/87166] 454.calculix benchmark is much slower on -Ofast with PGO or LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87166 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87166] 454.calculix benchmark is much slower on -Ofast with PGO or LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87166 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 87166, which changed state. Bug 87166 Summary: 454.calculix benchmark is much slower on -Ofast with PGO or LTO https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87166 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug driver/87161] if -Werror appear after -Wmissing-prototypes the warning is not turn into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87161 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |driver --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/78179] FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78179 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46935] We should recognize expanded switch statement and convert 2 way switch statements into shift & mask test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46935 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5) > > I know Tom de Vries is working on this problem and has a prototype patch. > > He'll be posting his work for 4.7. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/m

[Bug driver/87161] if -Werror appear after -Wmissing-prototypes the warning is not turn into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87161 --- Comment #3 from Nir Aizik --- I think what make it counter-intuitive is that warning from valid option the order of Werror is not important example: g++ -c -Wunused-variable -Werror test.cpp -o test.o test.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, cha

[Bug libstdc++/78179] FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78179 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- We already disable it rather liberally on AIX: // { dg-xfail-run-if "AIX long double" { powerpc-ibm-aix* } } Maybe we should split the long double parts into a separate file and just xfail that on affecte

[Bug tree-optimization/87167] New: strlen of stack-allocated zero-length array misoptimized in GCC 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87167 Bug ID: 87167 Summary: strlen of stack-allocated zero-length array misoptimized in GCC 8 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/87161] if -Werror appear after -Wmissing-prototypes the warning is not turn into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87161 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Nir Aizik from comment #3) > I think what make it counter-intuitive is that warning from valid option the > order of Werror is not important Warnings from the code can't be emitted until compi

[Bug driver/87161] if -Werror appear after -Wmissing-prototypes the warning is not turn into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87161 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- This would all be solved if invalid warning options were never errors, as Richi suggested. Otherwise I think there would need to be a first pass of the options to look for -Werror and then do a second pass

[Bug c++/80916] [6/7/8/9 Regression] Spurious "declared 'static' but never defined" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80916 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-11-27 00:00:00 |2018-8-31 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/87167] strlen of stack-allocated zero-length array misoptimized in GCC 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87167 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/87167] strlen of stack-allocated zero-length array misoptimized in GCC 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87167 --- Comment #2 from Matti Niemenmaa --- Thanks for the info. I peeked at the git log and came across PR86914 — this looks like a duplicate of that. Sorry for not managing to find it in Bugzilla earlier.

[Bug tree-optimization/87168] New: ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87168 Bug ID: 87168 Summary: ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/84707] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (tree_check()/duplicate_decls())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84707 --- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Aug 31 12:38:00 2018 New Revision: 264016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264016&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/87155] Anonymous namespace and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patch

[Bug c++/87155] [8/9 Regression] unnamed namespace redeclaration error when inline namespace is present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87155 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Aug 31 12:38:00 2018 New Revision: 264016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264016&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/87155] Anonymous namespace and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patch

[Bug c++/87155] [8/9 Regression] unnamed namespace redeclaration error when inline namespace is present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87155 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Fixed trunk r264016.

[Bug c++/86898] [9 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p784.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86898 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86744] gcc.target/i386/addr-sel-1.c XPASSes on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86744 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87168] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87168 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86744] gcc.target/i386/addr-sel-1.c XPASSes on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86744 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Just remove XPASS. Ideally, this test should also work for 64bit targets (PR 87055).

[Bug target/86744] gcc.target/i386/addr-sel-1.c XPASSes on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86744 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) > Just remove XPASS. Eh, XFAIL from the test.

[Bug c++/87155] [8/9 Regression] unnamed namespace redeclaration error when inline namespace is present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87155 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Aug 31 12:57:45 2018 New Revision: 264017 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264017&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/87155] Anonymous namespace and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patch

[Bug c++/87155] [8/9 Regression] unnamed namespace redeclaration error when inline namespace is present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87155 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84707] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (tree_check()/duplicate_decls())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84707 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Aug 31 12:57:45 2018 New Revision: 264017 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264017&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/87155] Anonymous namespace and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc

[Bug c++/84707] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (tree_check()/duplicate_decls())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84707 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87168] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87168 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- It shows a few things, first, SSA names defined before the value-numbered region are not considered "available". So for _1 = ...; region_begin: _2 = _1; _3 = _2; we'd not optimize to _2 = _1; _3 =

[Bug tree-optimization/87169] New: ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87169 Bug ID: 87169 Summary: ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/86850] ubsan: runtime error: member call on null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86850 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- I tried out your suggestion and got this: $ ~/gcc/results.264011.dcb.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -O3 -std=c89 -w bug453.c during GIMPLE pass: slp src/rate.c: In function ‘od_enc_rc_reset’: src/rate.c:365:13: internal

[Bug c++/43105] Document restrictions on mixing -fno-rtti and -frtti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43105 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jeffrey Yasskin from comment #0) > programs don't link when a -frtti class is derived from a -fno-rtti base > class. It's more complicated than that. The ABI defines when RTTI is emitted: http

[Bug c++/87108] Template partial specialization is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87108 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87108] Template partial specialization is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87108 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/87108] Template partial specialization is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87108 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ada/87170] New: compiler complains about not referenced character literals if they are only used in string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87170 Bug ID: 87170 Summary: compiler complains about not referenced character literals if they are only used in string literals Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/87104] missed &, == optimization makes Emacs ~0.4% slower on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87104 --- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to pipcet from comment #12) > So I think the performance difference is really significant for Emacs; my > plan is to test all three versions on other programs, make sure the code > works for C bitfie

[Bug c++/77435] Dependent reference non-type template parameter not matched for partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77435 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/87106] Group move and destruction of the source, where possible, for speed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Created attachment 44638 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44638&action=edit proof of concept patch (diff -w) Trying to get an idea of how things could look like. I know is_trivially_move_co

[Bug tree-optimization/87168] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87168 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/86914] [8 Regression] -O2 generates wrong code with strlen() of pointers within one-element arrays of structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matti.niemenmaa+gccbugs@iki

[Bug tree-optimization/87169] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87169 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87167] strlen of stack-allocated zero-length array misoptimized in GCC 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87167 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug c/87171] New: -march=native doesn't detect flags correctly on G4560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 Bug ID: 87171 Summary: -march=native doesn't detect flags correctly on G4560 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7/8/9 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22 fr

[Bug fortran/87172] New: [9 Regression] Spurious "Derived type 'c_funptr' at (1) has not been declared" error after r263782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87172 Bug ID: 87172 Summary: [9 Regression] Spurious "Derived type 'c_funptr' at (1) has not been declared" error after r263782 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87172] [9 Regression] Spurious "Derived type 'c_funptr' at (1) has not been declared" error after r263782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87172 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7/8/9 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reasonable people have different opinions on whether that's valid. But since they're unlikely to change, I need to accept that with some implementations, malloc(n) is aligned to min(n, alignof(max_align_t)

[Bug c++/84075] Template parameter not resolved: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::serialization::U’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/42921] No error with missing header and -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42921 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87168] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87168 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87168] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87168 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 31 16:50:13 2018 New Revision: 264021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264021&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/87168

[Bug tree-optimization/87169] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87169 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/87136] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87136 --- Comment #4 from Darko Veberic --- after 3 days of running the delta managed to bring down the .ii file from 4.5MB to 1.4MB but it then failed with error message Died at ~/soft/delta/trunk/delta line 123, <> line 104113.

[Bug fortran/87172] [9 Regression] Spurious "Derived type 'c_funptr' at (1) has not been declared" error after r263782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87172 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced test case: module m1 use iso_c_binding, only: c_funptr end module module m2 use m1 use iso_c_binding end module

[Bug fortran/66575] Endless compilation on missing end interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66575 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/87136] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87136 --- Comment #5 from Darko Veberic --- fortunately enough, i could manually find a very short minimal example which still contains the failure. to reproduce the internal compiler error one should compile the example as g++ -c minimal_example.cc

[Bug c++/87122] [8/9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_decomp_names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87122 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87136] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87136 --- Comment #6 from Darko Veberic --- Created attachment 44639 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44639&action=edit minimal example which contains the internal compiler error minimal_example.cc:21:57: internal compiler error: i

[Bug c++/87136] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87136 --- Comment #7 from Darko Veberic --- i get the internal error with g++ (Ubuntu 8-20180414-1ubuntu2) 8.0.1 20180414 (experimental) [trunk revision 259383] and g++-7 (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3) 7.3.0

[Bug middle-end/87173] New: -Walloc-size-larger-than= silently fails for operands/size values larger than __SIZE_MAX__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87173 Bug ID: 87173 Summary: -Walloc-size-larger-than= silently fails for operands/size values larger than __SIZE_MAX__ Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/87173] -Walloc-size-larger-than= silently fails for operands/size values larger than __SIZE_MAX__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87173 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/87174] New: virt-specifier not recognized on function declared like a variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87174 Bug ID: 87174 Summary: virt-specifier not recognized on function declared like a variable Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/87136] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87136 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/85496] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||darko.veberic at ijs dot si --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/87173] -Walloc-size-larger-than= silently fails for operands/size values larger than __SIZE_MAX__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87173 --- Comment #2 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Right, thanks. I'll just submit a patch for gcc.dg/Walloc-size-larger-than-{4,5,6,7}.c to require "size32plus" then.

  1   2   >