[Bug tree-optimization/86914] [8/9 Regression] -O2 generates wrong code with strlen() of pointers within one-element arrays of structures

2018-08-27 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 28 00:25:50 2018 New Revision: 263905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263905&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/86914 - wrong code with strlen() of poor-man's flexib

[Bug tree-optimization/86914] [8 Regression] -O2 generates wrong code with strlen() of pointers within one-element arrays of structures

2018-08-27 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] -O2|[8 Regression] -O2 |gen

[Bug c++/87109] Wrong overload picked with ref-qualifiers

2018-08-27 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87109 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

2018-08-27 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

2018-08-27 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- It's different, but related.

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

2018-08-27 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Aug 28 04:02:11 2018 New Revision: 263906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263906&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/87110 * tree-ssa-dse.c (compute_trims)

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

2018-08-27 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87121] New: wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size

2018-08-27 Thread mpreda at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87121 Bug ID: 87121 Summary: wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/87121] wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size

2018-08-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-08-27 Thread mscfd at gmx dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #12 from martin --- The workaround mentioned by Paul in comment #9 is working only partially. For character sequences (and possibly other data types), valgrind still complains. Surprisingly, using a single character works as well. On

[Bug c++/87121] wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size

2018-08-27 Thread mpreda at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87121 --- Comment #2 from Mihai Preda --- OK my bad. I don't understand exactly why the or the std:: pow() version is preferred, but this seems to be what's happening, and explains the behavior. Feel free to close this.

[Bug tree-optimization/87117] [9 Regression] ICE in eliminate_dom_walker::eliminate_cleanup(bool) at gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5431 since r263875

2018-08-27 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87117 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

<    1   2