https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86181
--- Comment #2 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
I reported the code to llvm. A developer of llvm said:
Clang follows the agreed direction for CWG issue 1839, which says that
redeclaration lookup for 'extern int i;' finds the 'static int i;' de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86877
Bug ID: 86877
Summary: ICE in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8038
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86877
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-8-7
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86877
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86865
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86876
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-8-7
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86875
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86874
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86871
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86876
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86858
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #32 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Aug 7 08:51:29 2018
New Revision: 263352
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263352&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c on SPARC etc. (PR
tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86871
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Shortened even more by removing operator overload:
int b;
int c;
void g() {
for (int f; f; f++) {
int d = 0;
for (int e = -1; e <= 1; e++) {
int a = f + e;
if (a)
d = *(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #33 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Aug 7 08:58:20 2018
New Revision: 263353
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263353&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c on SPARC etc. (PR
tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86871
johannes.hirte at datenkhaos dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannes.hirte at da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86181
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I've asked you repeatedly to provide links to the clang bugs you're quoting
from.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86181
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|RES
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86872
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32815
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83023
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Aug 7 11:59:13 2018
New Revision: 263355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add malloc predictor (PR middle-end/83023).
2018-08-07 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83023
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86878
Bug ID: 86878
Summary: G++ should warn about invalid alignments passed to
allocation functions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnosti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86863
Zaak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Zaa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86879
Bug ID: 86879
Summary: G++ should warn about redundant tests for null
pointers returned from functions with
__attribute__((returns_nonnull))
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64463
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I created the very similar PR 86879 for the C++ front-end (it also covers an
additional case, where a function returns a reference and the address is
compared to null).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64463
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Reini Urban from comment #0)
> I would like to see a warning when a returns_nonnull function is compared
> against a NULL value, and then actual code is removed or skipped based on
> that attri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64463
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Incorrectly putting the attribute on the function is likely to be much rarer
> than unnecessarily checking the result.
And PR 84202 would address the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86874
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79133
--- Comment #6 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Tue Aug 7 13:46:16 2018
New Revision: 263357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263357&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79133
gcc/cp/
PR c++/79133
* name-lookup.c (check_local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79133
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 79133, which changed state.
Bug 79133 Summary: lambda capture shadowing parameter & decltype confusion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79133
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86807
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Aug 7 14:33:09 2018
New Revision: 263358
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263358&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR number for HPPA speculation patch: PR target/86807 -> PR tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86785
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Aug 7 14:33:09 2018
New Revision: 263358
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263358&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR number for HPPA speculation patch: PR target/86807 -> PR tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86785, which changed state.
Bug 86785 Summary: hppa port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86785
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86785
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86880
Bug ID: 86880
Summary: Incorrect mersenne_twister_engine equality comparison
between rotated states
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #14 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
reported by christophe.l...@linaro.org:
After this change,(disable strcmp/strncmp inlining with O2 below and Os), I've
noticed that:
FAIL: gcc.dg/strcmpopt_6.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand "__buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86872
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Aug 7 15:06:01 2018
New Revision: 263359
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263359&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Set cfun->machine->max_used_stack_alignment if needed
cfun->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86861
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 16:10:29 2018
New Revision: 263360
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263360&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86861 Meet precondition for Solaris memalign
Solaris memali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86878
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 16:10:29 2018
New Revision: 263360
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263360&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86861 Meet precondition for Solaris memalign
Solaris memali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #21 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Aug 7 16:40:18 2018
New Revision: 263361
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263361&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-08-07 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59480, DR 136
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #15 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 44516
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44516&action=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #16 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
please test the proposed patch on your platform, let me know the result.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Started with
commit cd557ff63f388ad27c376d0a225e74d3594a6f9d
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Aug 10 15:29:05 2017 +
i386: Don't use frame pointer without stack access
When there is no stack access, ther
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86871
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86858
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86838
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Aug 7 17:22:19 2018
New Revision: 263362
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263362&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix -mlow-precision-div (PR 86838)
The "@" ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86838
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86880
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60441
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Hi,
Hope you having a great day!
I just wanted to be aware if you looking to acquire Oracle E-Business Users
Contact List for your marketing efforts?
We also have users of: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Ab Initio, SAS Enterprise,
Deltek Vision, Zucchetti and many more...
Kindly review and l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881
Bug ID: 86881
Summary: tree check fail with flag Wshadow-compatible-local
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86874
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 19:13:26 2018
New Revision: 263365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263365&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86874 fix std::variant::swap regression
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
Bug ID: 86882
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at
rtlanal.c:1873
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86874
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 21:38:50 2018
New Revision: 263368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263368&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86874 fix std::variant::swap regression
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 21:38:55 2018
New Revision: 263369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263369&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60555 std::system_category() should recognise POSIX errno v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86861
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 21:38:45 2018
New Revision: 263367
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263367&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86861 Meet precondition for Solaris memalign
Solaris memali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84535
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 21:38:59 2018
New Revision: 263370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84535 constrain std::thread constructor
The standard requir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86874
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84535
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.3
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
This patch seems to work
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index b67481dd2db..6ecdc4562d0 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
@@ -14304,7 +14304,8 @@ based_loc_descr (rtx reg, poly_int6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86879
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86883
Bug ID: 86883
Summary: Unexpected error: expansion pattern ''
contains no argument packs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86883
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And PR 86859
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86883
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See also PR 68342 and PR 85569
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86862
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
This test:
---
struct Foo
{
int bar(int a, int b, int c, int i1, int i2, int i3, int d);
};
int Foo::bar(int a, int b, int c, int i1, int i2, int i3, int d)
{
return 0;
}
---
also triggers SUPPORTS_STACK_A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86734
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:11 2018
New Revision: 263374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263374&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86734 use addressof in reverse_iterator::operator->
Backpor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:24 2018
New Revision: 263377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60555 std::system_category() should recognise POSIX errno v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80893
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:45 2018
New Revision: 263381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80893 Fix null dereference in vector
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86292
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:33 2018
New Revision: 263379
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86292 fix exception safety of std::vector
constructor
Backp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86861
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:19 2018
New Revision: 263376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86861 Meet precondition for Solaris memalign
Solaris memali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:40 2018
New Revision: 263380
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68519 use native duration to avoid rounding errors
Backpor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86734
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84654
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:49 2018
New Revision: 263382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84654 Disable __float128 specializations for -mno-float128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:55 2018
New Revision: 263383
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263383&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Declare some explicit instantiations for strings in Debug Mode
The empt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 7 22:50:49 2018
New Revision: 263382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84654 Disable __float128 specializations for -mno-float128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86861
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86292
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.2 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.4
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84654
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80147
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> > ...but if that's the case, then why doesn't the warning go away for i1, too?
>
> Because "is-used" is given
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86878
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81419
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> Confirmed. There are few other similar bugs for these fix-it hints (e.g.,
> pr80567 or pr80684). I haven't looked at the implementation but from the
> symptoms i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86878
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from Eric Galla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86884
Bug ID: 86884
Summary: aggressive loop optimization and effective type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86885
Bug ID: 86885
Summary: gcc erroneously allows constructor/destructor
attributes on nested functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
95 matches
Mail list logo