[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

2018-07-25 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

2018-07-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- register const void __user *__p asm("r0") = __ptr; etc. isn't a problem, here __p isn't const, only *__p is. The problem is if the register variable itself is const. So arch/h8300/kernel/sim-console.c:

[Bug fortran/86587] Derived-type with attributes BIND(C) and PRIVATE raises an error but standard accepts it

2018-07-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86587 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Priority|

[Bug c/86668] mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition

2018-07-25 Thread amrosalem820 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 --- Comment #2 from amr --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > Please use gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org for user questions. > > With the prototype in scope the non-prototyped definition of fun is > adjusted. This doesn't happen if the protot

[Bug c/86668] mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition

2018-07-25 Thread amrosalem820 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 --- Comment #3 from amr --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > Please use gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org for user questions. > > With the prototype in scope the non-prototyped definition of fun is > adjusted. This doesn't happen if the protot

[Bug c/19315] document undocumented extension that allows code where variable is not emitted in the asm

2018-07-25 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On July 25, 2018 5:50:40 PM GMT+02:00, "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315 > >Eric Gallager changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug c++/85515] Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions"

2018-07-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jul 25 16:46:34 2018 New Revision: 262975 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262975&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/85515 * cp-tree.h (enum cp_tree_index): Add

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

2018-07-25 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Monakov --- > I don't see what should we warn about. I think the suggestion was to warn when a register const variable appears in constraints, because the asm is not then guaranteed to receive that operand in that

[Bug c/86668] mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition

2018-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/scope

You'rе my viсtim

2018-07-25 Thread b
Hi, viсtim. I write yоu beсausе I рut а malwаre оn thе web раgе with pоrn whiсh you have visited. My virus grabbеd аll yоur реrsоnаl info аnd turnеd оn your саmеra which captured thе process оf your оnаnism. Just аfter thаt thе soft saved your соntаct list. I will delete thе соmpromising vidеo a

[Bug c/85745] variable with asm register assignment allocated in wrong reg

2018-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85745 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|c --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

2018-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/85745] variable with asm register assignment allocated in wrong reg

2018-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85745 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnd at linaro dot org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

2018-07-25 Thread jwjagersma at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Comment #10 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 2 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2&action=edit preprocessed source to trigger ICE (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9) > Thanks for c

[Bug c/86668] mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition

2018-07-25 Thread amrosalem820 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 --- Comment #5 from amr --- I know all these rules , I mean he said the prototype in scope ,, he means inside main or outside in my example

[Bug libstdc++/86676] New: 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 Bug ID: 86676 Summary: 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-07-25 Thread koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #43 from Nicolas Koenig --- Author: koenigni Date: Wed Jul 25 18:48:39 2018 New Revision: 262978 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262978&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-25 Nicolas Koenig Thomas Koenig PR fortr

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-07-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #44 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT this 2018-07-25 Nicolas Koenig Thomas Koenig PR fortran/25829 * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/async_io_1.f90: New test. * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/async_io_2.

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The AIX failures are different and should be fixed at r262977

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-07-25 Thread koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #45 from Nicolas Koenig --- Author: koenigni Date: Wed Jul 25 19:34:33 2018 New Revision: 262979 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262979&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-25 Nicolas Koenig Thomas Koenig PR fortr

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oops, the test depends on stack alignment of a char buffer. Patch incoming.

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jul 25 20:23:07 2018 New Revision: 262980 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262980&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/86676 Do not assume stack buffer is aligned PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-25 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #15 from The Written Word --- Created attachment 3 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3&action=edit gcc/config/rs6000/aix53.h patch Similar to r227907 but for AIX 5.3 Have used this to successfully build gc

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

2018-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jul 25 23:38:17 2018 New Revision: 262984 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262984&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/86676 another alignment fix for test PR libstdc++/8

Submitting Your Manuscripts _ Dear bug-gcc _ 3206753

2018-07-25 Thread Journal JEEE
Dear Author/Researcher, For the purpose of supplying a better platform for you authors to publish papers, we sincerely invite scholars and researchers to submit papers to the journals or to join in the editorial board/reviewer team. To Become One of the Editorial Bo

Is branding your concern?

2018-07-25 Thread Melvin
Is branding your concern? Most companies are thinking which way is the most effective yet affordable way to reach customers or clients? Having difficulty to reach the person that make it happen? We are the solution! Big data is the fut

[Bug target/86677] New: popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build

2018-07-25 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677 Bug ID: 86677 Summary: popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/86678] New: constexpr evaluation incorrectly diagnoses unevaluated call to non-constexpr function

2018-07-25 Thread eric at efcs dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86678 Bug ID: 86678 Summary: constexpr evaluation incorrectly diagnoses unevaluated call to non-constexpr function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED S

<    1   2