[Bug go/86535] FreeBSD/PowerPC64 - Building Go Frontend support for gcc 7.3.0 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535 --- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Sorry, you're right, it's -fdump-go-spec.

[Bug fortran/85599] warn about short-circuiting of logical expressions for non-pure functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/86550] Lambda parsing allows arbitrary types in decl-specifier-seq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86550 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jul 18 21:01:54 2018 New Revision: 262862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262862&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86550 * parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Di

[Bug c++/86469] Dwarf Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (5846).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469 --- Comment #15 from Jonny Grant --- Hi Richard I cannot reproduce DWARF errors without undefined references (by removing the implementation of a function). It is taking me a long time to reduce and still keep the error Which has different numb

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) > As noted already somewhere in the discussion of PR85599 on the mailing list, > this breaks actual_pointer_function_1.f90 in the testsuite ... but apart from t

[Bug fortran/86576] New: [F03][OOP] Sourced allocation of object array fails with SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86576 Bug ID: 86576 Summary: [F03][OOP] Sourced allocation of object array fails with SEGFAULT Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86414] AIX generates wrong for divide and multiply for KC mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86414 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- Author: carll Date: Wed Jul 18 22:12:20 2018 New Revision: 262865 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262865&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2018-07-18 Carl Love Backport from mainl

[Bug tree-optimization/86544] Popcount detection generates different code on C and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86544 --- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Wed Jul 18 22:11:24 2018 New Revision: 262864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262864&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-07-18 Kugan Vivekanandarajah PR

[Bug target/86414] AIX generates wrong for divide and multiply for KC mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86414 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86414] AIX generates wrong for divide and multiply for KC mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86414 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Carl Love --- Is

[Bug c++/86577] New: non-ADL name lookup for operator<< at instantiation time?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86577 Bug ID: 86577 Summary: non-ADL name lookup for operator<< at instantiation time? Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/86578] New: requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86578 Bug ID: 86578 Summary: requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86579] New: invalid operands to binary expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86579 Bug ID: 86579 Summary: invalid operands to binary expression Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Both. It's been low priority because I noticed it by observation, but it's never been reported by users or caused any problems that I'm aware of (until now, maybe).

[Bug c++/86580] New: No warning for default arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86580 Bug ID: 86580 Summary: No warning for default arguments Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug c++/86581] New: constexpr variable is not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86581 Bug ID: 86581 Summary: constexpr variable is not checked Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/86578] requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86578 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17743 GCC 4.3.x and above support this feature.

[Bug debug/86582] New: [debug] vla size reported as 0 at Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86582 Bug ID: 86582 Summary: [debug] vla size reported as 0 at Og Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c++/86578] requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86578 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86583] New: exception specification of explicitly defaulted destructor does not match the calculated one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86583 Bug ID: 86583 Summary: exception specification of explicitly defaulted destructor does not match the calculated one Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/86552] missing warning for reading past the end of non-string arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86552 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 44407 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44407&action=edit Preliminary patch. Lightly tested patch to apply on top of the one for bug 86532.

[Bug other/36994] gcc/makefile contains one very long line (over 2k)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Severity|normal

[Bug c/60440] Bogus -Wreturn-type warning after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Thanks for CC. Patches are currently under review. > About this PR: as 'b' is undeclared, the whole statement with the expression > is ignored and we have: > > (g

[Bug target/69179] undocumented darwin attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > (In reply to sandra from comment #0) > > config/darwin.c defines attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and > > "weak_import" which have no documentation in the GCC

[Bug bootstrap/37704] RFE: Need specific version of --disable-multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37704 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Severity|normal

[Bug c/86584] New: Incorrect -Wsequence-point warning on structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86584 Bug ID: 86584 Summary: Incorrect -Wsequence-point warning on structure member Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

<    1   2