https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 07:29:31 2018
New Revision: 262677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Richard Biener
PR ipa/86389
* gcc.dg/tor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86530
Bug ID: 86530
Summary: Vectorization failure for a simple loop
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86208
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 16 07:43:43 2018
New Revision: 262678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/3698
PR c++/86208
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3698
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 16 07:43:43 2018
New Revision: 262678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/3698
PR c++/86208
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_generi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3698
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 16 07:44:48 2018
New Revision: 262679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/3698
PR c++/86208
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_generi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86208
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 16 07:44:48 2018
New Revision: 262679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/3698
PR c++/86208
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86530
--- Comment #1 from Jiangning Liu ---
Created attachment 44396
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44396&action=edit
vectorization failure
Attached is -O3 result for aarch64, in which no vectorization code generated at
all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86517
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 44397
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44397&action=edit
Full reproducer
As mentioned in my first commit, -shared was only used in order to reduce the
test-case. I'm att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86517
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86530
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86517
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
The problem is logic in lto-wrapper (which is mine)
/* Merge PIC options:
-fPIC + -fpic = -fpic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|New test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86525
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86524
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86529
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80641
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #11)
> *** Bug 86516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to Paul Gotch from comment #10)
> I'm afraid the changes made to libstdc++ have o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86487
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80641
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.1, 8.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86514
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jul 16 08:59:09 2018
New Revision: 262684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86514
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (init_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86514
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jul 16 09:02:03 2018
New Revision: 262685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86514
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (init_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86417
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Fritz Reese from comment #12)
> If we set the component's locus when it is loaded from a module, the
> following patch fixes the issue and retains sane location information for
> the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86531
Bug ID: 86531
Summary: [9 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr37726.c fail
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86514
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86208
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86455
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jul 16 09:18:51 2018
New Revision: 262687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262687&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[debug] Fix pre_dec handling in vartrack
When compiling test-case gcc.targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80641
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.3.1
--- Comment #14 from Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86455
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
actually array seems to be a VAR_DECL here...
p array->base.code
$38 = VAR_DECL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86526
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86526
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86531
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86526
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As the patch contains a lot of formatting fixes (Qing, please watch out
formatting of your patches more carefully, there should be no whitespace at the
end of lines, tabs should be used rather than 8 spaces,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
__is_pointer_helper and __is_integral_helper are not available in C++98 and are
not supposed to be used directly anyway, they're just implementation details
for is_pointer and is_integral.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Also you're doing a reinterpret_cast from an arbitrary iterator type, which is
not necessarily a pointer, or even a random access iterator.
Since you don't have a copyright assignment in place please leav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
slightly modified test case blows off at -O0
$ cat t.c
void __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
test(char *data, __SIZE_TYPE__ len)
{
static char const appended[] = "/./";
char *buf = __builtin_alloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85624
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Shouldn't this use the library routine because setmemhi expander FAILs when
operands[1] is not a const_int? It is (reg:QI 48) which is not a const_int.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86513
--- Comment #2 from Csaba Ráduly ---
I don't get this. ostringstream isn't even supposed to have a default
constructor, only the openmode, string and openmode, and the move constructor
(if I'm reading [ostringstream.cons] in N4659 right).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86513
--- Comment #3 from Csaba Ráduly ---
I don't get this. ostringstream isn't even supposed to have a default
constructor, only the openmode, string and openmode, and the move constructor
(if I'm reading [ostringstream.cons] in N4659 right).
In the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85935
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:01:48 2018
New Revision: 262690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86076
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:01:48 2018
New Revision: 262690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:01:48 2018
New Revision: 262690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 85935, which changed state.
Bug 85935 Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at
graphite-sese-to-poly.c:287
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85935
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Bug ID: 86532
Summary: [9 Regression] Wrong code due to a wrong strlen
folding starting with r262522
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:57:10 2018
New Revision: 262691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-19 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86457
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:57:10 2018
New Revision: 262691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-19 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:57:10 2018
New Revision: 262691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-19 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86040
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86524
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86524
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so we populate debug_line_str_hash via dwarf2out_early_finish LTO debug
output
#0 output_line_string (form=DW_FORM_line_strp,
str=0x7fffeb19 "/abuild/rguenther/obj-sccvn-g/gcc",
entry_kin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86513
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86529
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jul 16 13:33:23 2018
New Revision: 262695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert one more symbol_summary::get to ::get_create (PR ipa/86529).
2018-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86529
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Created attachment 44399 [details]
> patch
>
> The attached fixes the ICE. Martin, this was likely reduced from sth else?
> I guess nobody uses -gdwarf-5 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 13:57:32 2018
New Revision: 262696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Richard Biener
PR lto/86523
* dwarf2out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86436
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
--- Comment #5 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I wouldn't be surprised if the build fails with -Wnarrowing (but maybe that
should be fixed anyway, so we can build with non-GNU compilers that default to
C++11 or later).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov ---
Yep, that's correct: -Wno-narrowing is necessary for build to succeed at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
Bug ID: 86533
Summary: [9.0 regression] Compile error on valid code: error:
no matching function for call to
'std::allocator::allocator(const
_Tp_alloc_type&)'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86534
Bug ID: 86534
Summary: Linking gcc with gold fails, when libisl is under
/usr/local/lib
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
Bug ID: 86535
Summary: FreeBSD/PowerPC64 - Building Go Frontend support for
gcc 7.3.0 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86536
Bug ID: 86536
Summary: Function "returned NAN %" for a simple program which
forks
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86511
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jul 16 15:11:57 2018
New Revision: 262736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86511
* expmed.c (emit_store_flag): Do n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
Bug ID: 86537
Summary: std::less specialization for std::shared_ptr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86526
--- Comment #4 from Qing Zhao ---
> On Jul 16, 2018, at 5:01 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> As the patch contains a lot of formatting fixes (Qing, please watch out
> formatting of your patches m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What system are you testing on? I've seen the same failure on power 8 and
power 9 LE systems and power 7 and power 8 BE systems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86520
Stephen Warren changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Warre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Can you attach a copy of the generated file gen-sysinfo.go?
What does the definition of, say, cmsghdr look like in (or some
header file included by that one)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
My best guess is that you've messed up your GCC installation, because
_GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR should be defined in like so:
#ifndef _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
# if __cplusplus > 201703L
# define _GLIBCXX20_CONSTE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
--- Comment #2 from rpirrera at aitek dot it ---
Any news on the fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
Bug ID: 86538
Summary: GCC should define a macro to specify if LSE is enabled
or not
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The changes from lwg 1262 were implemented by r171293 but we never got rid of
the partial specialization of std::less.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #3 from Qing Zhao ---
> --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> What system are you testing on? I've seen the same failure on power 8 and
> power 9 LE systems and power 7 and power 8 BE systems.
I am using the GCC farm m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> My best guess is that you've messed up your GCC installation, because
> _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR should be defined in like so:
>
> #ifndef _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
>
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo