https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86174
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86173
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> There's also the following weak heuristic that might kick in if
> CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING would be set:
>
> else if (num_ctor_elements - num_nonzero_elements
> > CLEAR_RATIO (optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85804
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86179
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #25 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #24)
> Author: kugan
> Date: Sat Jun 16 21:34:29 2018
> New Revision: 261681
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261681&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86144
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to vekumar from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Note a workaround would be to re-arrange the vectorizer calls to
> > vectorizable_simd_clone_call and vectorizable_cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
--- Comment #2 from Danil Ilinykh ---
I explicity said to compiler, what I want to convert int to size_t. And it
still produces warning.
If I replace static_cast to variable with the same initialization, warning will
be gone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Mon Jun 18 10:39:01 2018
New Revision: 261697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ensure that control characters in user supplied error and warning messages
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86170
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86176
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
I wonder, is there a way to configure GCC to perform in a way similar to static
analyser? GCC warnings are very useful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191
Bug ID: 86191
Summary: A missing error message?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #26 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Mon Jun 18 11:10:51 2018
New Revision: 261698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[testsuite] Remove xfail from vect-abs-compile.c
Since PR64946 has been fixed, w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86192
Bug ID: 86192
Summary: A not fully fixed bug?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86192
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80061
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86188
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See Bug 65861 which looks relevant, especially Bug 65861 comment 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193
Bug ID: 86193
Summary: A recurring bug?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassi
trunk-261695-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180618 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86194
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Further reduced:
typedef unsigned long size_t;
struct vector {
typedef size_t size_type;
size_type size();
};
bool func(vector vec, int var)
{
return vec.size() < static_cast(var);
}
sc.cc: In f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86176
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, because GCC is not a static analyser.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86177
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Lots of functions have such requirements and make it the caller's
responsibility to meet those requirements.
GCC is not a static analyser, you can't expect warnings about every possible
bug in your code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86076
--- Comment #7 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Mon Jun 18 12:17:10 2018
New Revision: 261699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[testsuite] Add target pthread to pr86076.c
Add missing target pthread to ensure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86184
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86185
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86183
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
Yves Vandriessche changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yves.vandriessche at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Rian Quinn from comment #0)
> template
> myallocator4(const myallocator4 &other) noexcept
> { (void) other; }
You know you can just not name a parameter, instead of casting it to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #61 from Andrew Jenner ---
Sorry, once again I have been totally swamped by other work. It's now looking
like I should have some time to work on this in early July.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This changed with GCC 4.5, it was ambiguous before then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86182
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid,|ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86074
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluescarni at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78925
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82204
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86180
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82204
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80414
Denis Khalikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189
--- Comment #4 from Rian Quinn ---
Nope, I think that is the root of the issue. Where exactly does the spec
state that as this is the first I have heard of this.
Thanks a ton,
- Rian
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:31 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org <
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195
Bug ID: 86195
Summary: Ref-qualified nested class member function issue
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
[allocator.requirements]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sbergman at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
With recent trunk (on Linux x86_64), and doesn't seem to be covered by existing
bugs referenced from meta bug 84774:
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20180618 (experimental)
> Copy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197
Bug ID: 86197
Summary: POWERPC: float128 parameter passing
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
Note, this is restricted to powerpc64le using ELFv2 ABI.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Monteverde ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> This started to fail on trunk with r251438
>
> It seems to have been fixed on the gcc-8-branch though. 8.1.1 is not a
> release, we need to know exactly whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jun 18 16:32:59 2018
New Revision: 261705
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261705&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/81384 - built-in form of strnlen missing
gcc/ChangeL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 81384, which changed state.
Bug 81384 Summary: built-in form of strnlen missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175
zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86171
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
A well-formed variant:
template struct A;
template using B = typename A::X;
template struct A {
typedef int X;
typedef B U;
};
B b;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86198
Bug ID: 86198
Summary: Libbacktrace does not properly work with
".note.gnu.build-id" section
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199
Bug ID: 86199
Summary: warn on calls to strlen with same argument as in
strnlen
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86171
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 18 18:16:38 2018
New Revision: 261709
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261709&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86171 - ICE with recursive alias instantiation.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86171
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71659
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to postmaster from comment #2)
> Portability is one main reason to add missing intrinsics... with combination
> of cpuid check and _xgetbv() we can cleanly check if AVX or MPX is available
> at run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85905
coypu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200
Bug ID: 86200
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at
cp/pt.c:24634
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201
Bug ID: 86201
Summary: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202
Bug ID: 86202
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at
tree-ssanames.c:407
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
Bug ID: 86203
Summary: duplicate non-constant call to strlen() not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85358
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Jun 18 19:10:08 2018
New Revision: 261712
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261712&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-06-18 Michael Meissner
PR target/85358
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86204
Bug ID: 86204
Summary: [9 Regression] wrong strlen result after prior strnlen
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86204
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86204
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01087.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86196
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
