https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86115
Bug ID: 86115
Summary: move_alloc for class(*) containing value of type
character(len=*) looses data
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86109
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86116
Bug ID: 86116
Summary: Ambiguous generic interface not recognised
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
For some reason, this part of x86_mitigate_rop:
int n_uses;
reg_class superclass = regrename_find_superclass (head, &n_uses,
&unavailable);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
> I'm not familiar enough with the ccfsm bits to know if there's something we
> ought to be doing generically to improve CC handling further. I think
> d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.sandiford at linaro
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86117
Bug ID: 86117
Summary: bogus warning maybe-uninitialized with class(*) and
source argument in allocate
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
Bug ID: 86118
Summary: Gcc segfault for big c++ data compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
--- Comment #1 from Александр Кроль ---
Created attachment 44262
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44262&action=edit
preprocessed file that triggers the bug
Due to size limit following command sequence was done:
1. bzip2 -k ./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
--- Comment #2 from Александр Кроль ---
Created attachment 44263
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44263&action=edit
second volume of preprocessed file
Due to size limit following command sequence was done:
1. bzip2 -k ./idfs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85988
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 12 11:08:52 2018
New Revision: 261491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libitm/x86: Correct offsets of __private_tm and pointer_guard
In g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86119
Bug ID: 86119
Summary: Intrinsic len has wrong type if used within select
type for a class(*) string
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Andrey Vihrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.vihrov at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85990
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85990
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 12 15:35:22 2018
New Revision: 261501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Linux/x86: Update TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET comments
Glibc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120
Bug ID: 86120
Summary: SIGSEGV without backtrace when using submodules
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85931
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:14:31 2018
New Revision: 261515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/85931 - -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncpy with size of source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85931
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Known to fail|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121
Bug ID: 86121
Summary: [9 Regression] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strcpy
followed by strcat
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:55:24 2018
New Revision: 261516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/44491
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:05:05 2018
New Revision: 261517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261517&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/44491
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:05:13 2018
New Revision: 261518
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261518&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/85259 - Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:19:03 2018
New Revision: 261519
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261519&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/44491
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #6 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
Bug ID: 86122
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in useless_type_conversion_p, at
gimple-expr.c:87
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:21:06PM +, gs...@t-online.de wrote:
>
> --- Comment #6 from G. Steinmetz ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #4 and #5)
> > trunk can now compile this code.
> Confirming that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86123
Bug ID: 86123
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at
optabs.c:3967
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:28:25 2018
New Revision: 261520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261520&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/44491
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:28:37 2018
New Revision: 261521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
spellcheck: support transpositions aka Damerau-Levenshtein (PR other/69
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86124
Bug ID: 86124
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in create_variable_info_for, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:6123
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78068
Bug 78068 depends on bug 69968, which changed state.
Bug 69968 Summary: RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather
than Levenshtein
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Starke ---
The error does not occur if I pass -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59002
Bug 59002 depends on bug 61806, which changed state.
Bug 61806 Summary: [C++11] Expression sfinae w/o access gives hard error in
partial template specializations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85764
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125
Bug ID: 86125
Summary: missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a mismatched
return type
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In (i), that loclist format is used because of -gsplit-dwarf, I meant to say.
So we have 3 possible work-arounds immediately available: not using
-gsplit-dwarf, not disabling VTA, and disabling locviews.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85807
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85815
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 12 19:53:02 2018
New Revision: 261523
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261523&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86060 - ICE on range for with -std=c++98.
* parser
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85815
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 12 19:53:10 2018
New Revision: 261524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85815 - reference to member of enclosing template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86126
Bug ID: 86126
Summary: Note when linking libraries built with different -std
options
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 44266
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44266&action=edit
candidate patch
Here's the patch I'm testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86114
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86127
Bug ID: 86127
Summary: STL containers do not satisfy
container.requirements.general clause 8
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
It looks like this is on purpose. match_builtin_function_types, the function
that determines whether a declaration of a built-in matches its expected type,
has the following comment:
/* Subroutine of compa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83878
--- Comment #2 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Created attachment 44267
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44267&action=edit
Archive with GCNO, GCDA, source file and GCOV output
Sorry for replying late, but I just managed to find a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86098
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86098
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 13 03:33:06 2018
New Revision: 261536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86098 - ICE with template placeholder for TTP.
* t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86098
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86005
--- Comment #10 from James Y Knight ---
I suppose since it doesn't affect most common platforms, nobody's noticed the
brokenness yet?
ARM is probably the most common architecture which is missing atomics on common
CPU models, but when targeting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> > but should not fail verification even for !TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_VEC
> > targets. As a matter of fact, the compilation works with -mtune=intel.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86076
--- Comment #4 from paulhua at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paulhua
Date: Wed Jun 13 06:50:12 2018
New Revision: 261538
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261538&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-13 Chenghua Xu
PR target/86076
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84184
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc
71 matches
Mail list logo