[Bug go/85629] GCC 8.1.0: FTBFS: make check fails in Go part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85629 --- Comment #5 from Stefan --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #4) > Which version of which linker are you running? # ld -v GNU ld version 2.20.51.0.2-5.47.el6_9.1 20100205 > For that matter, which version of which assembler? # as -

[Bug c++/85305] Parameter pack expression in lambda capture list fails as part of a fold expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85305 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85305] Parameter pack expression in lambda capture list fails as part of a fold expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85305 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri May 4 20:20:16 2018 New Revision: 259959 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259959&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/85305 - pack in lambda init-capture. * parser.c (c

[Bug c++/85587] [8/9 Regression] bogus error: ‘F’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85587 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85407] Replace gcc_assert in module.c:read_module by more helpful diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85407 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/85657] New: Make __ibm128 a separate type, even if long double uses the IBM double-double format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85657 Bug ID: 85657 Summary: Make __ibm128 a separate type, even if long double uses the IBM double-double format Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug target/85657] Make __ibm128 a separate type, even if long double uses the IBM double-double format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85657 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/85658] New: gcc-8.0.1 stopped validating --with-arch= flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85658 Bug ID: 85658 Summary: gcc-8.0.1 stopped validating --with-arch= flag Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: dr

[Bug bootstrap/85658] gcc-8.0.1 stopped validating --with-arch= flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85658 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Looks like the bug is in operator precedence in awk between '!' and 'in'. This makes above tests to recover: diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/parsecpu.awk b/gcc/config/arm/parsecpu.awk index 56c762b3b..1135

[Bug bootstrap/85658] gcc-8.0.1 stopped validating --with-arch= flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85658 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Created attachment 44074 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44074&action=edit 93_all_arm-arch.patch

[Bug c++/85659] New: ICE with inline assembly inside virtual function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85659 Bug ID: 85659 Summary: ICE with inline assembly inside virtual function Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/85618] [8/9 Regression] Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85618 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug demangler/85660] New: Signed Integer Overflow (79257474)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85660 Bug ID: 85660 Summary: Signed Integer Overflow (79257474) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug c/85661] New: double comparison illegally statically reduced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85661 Bug ID: 85661 Summary: double comparison illegally statically reduced Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/85662] New: regression since 6: "error: non-constant condition for static assertion" from __builtin_offsetof in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85662 Bug ID: 85662 Summary: regression since 6: "error: non-constant condition for static assertion" from __builtin_offsetof in C++ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCON

<    1   2