[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c/79586] missing -Wdeprecated depending on position of attribute

2018-05-02 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79586 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/85613] New: [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test

2018-05-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85613 Bug ID: 85613 Summary: [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug libstdc++/69608] strsteambuf copy ctor and assignment inaccessible

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69608 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 16:25:44 2018 New Revision: 259842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259842&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/69608 Move semantics for strstreambuf In libstdc++ the depr

[Bug tree-optimization/85605] Potentially missing optimization under x64 and ARM: seemingly unnecessary branch in codegen

2018-05-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*, arm |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*, arm,

[Bug libstdc++/69608] strsteambuf copy ctor and assignment inaccessible

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69608 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70080] gslice_array's copy constructor doesn't work correctly

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70080 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/57997] Segmentation fault after returning valarray expression from an auto function

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57997 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 16:41:46 2018 New Revision: 259844 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259844&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83860 avoid dangling references in valarray closure types

[Bug libstdc++/83860] valarray replacement type breaks with auto and more than one operation

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83860 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 16:41:46 2018 New Revision: 259844 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259844&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83860 avoid dangling references in valarray closure types S

[Bug libstdc++/57997] Segmentation fault after returning valarray expression from an auto function

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57997 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83860] valarray replacement type breaks with auto and more than one operation

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83860 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

2018-05-02 Thread zbeekman at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #14 from Zaak --- Damn, it would have been nice if this patch made it in.

[Bug other/85614] New: Documentation: -fdump-tree should mention "original"

2018-05-02 Thread krblock at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85614 Bug ID: 85614 Summary: Documentation: -fdump-tree should mention "original" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

2018-05-02 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed May 2 17:22:26 2018 New Revision: 259849 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259849&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/30552 * c-decl.c (old_style_parameter_scope): New fun

[Bug libgomp/82428] Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size

2018-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 17:53:29 2018 New Revision: 259850 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259850&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [openacc] Add __builtin_goacc_parlevel_{id,size} 2018-05-02 Tom de Vries

[Bug libgomp/85411] [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin

2018-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85411 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 17:53:56 2018 New Revision: 259852 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259852&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin 2018-05-02 To

[Bug testsuite/83791] Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common

2018-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83791 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 17:53:43 2018 New Revision: 259851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259851&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [libgomp, testsuite] Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common 2018-05-02 Tom de

[Bug libgomp/85411] [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin

2018-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85411 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/83791] Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common

2018-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83791 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/82428] Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size

2018-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/82695] gnu gcc (4.8 - 7.1) cannot parse some system headers in macOS (10.12)

2018-05-02 Thread drikosev at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82695 --- Comment #3 from Ev Drikos --- gcc 8.1 on macos 10.13.4 successfully passes this test. Thanks, Ev. Drikos

[Bug c++/68374] G++ -Wshadow doesn't warn about static member shadowing

2018-05-02 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed May 2 18:15:56 2018 New Revision: 259853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259853&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2018-05-02 Paolo Carlini Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/68374] G++ -Wshadow doesn't warn about static member shadowing

2018-05-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85615] New: ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197

2018-05-02 Thread helloqirun at gmail dot com
9.0.0 20180502 (experimental) [trunk revision 259838] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O2 abc.c during GIMPLE pass: vrp abc.c: In function ‘fn1’: abc.c:3:6: internal compiler error: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197 void fn1() { ^~~ 0x5fc743 dfs_enumerate_from(basic_block_def*, int, bool

[Bug tree-optimization/85615] [8/9 Regression] ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197

2018-05-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85615 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85615] [8/9 Regression] ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197

2018-05-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85615 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- r247578

[Bug target/85616] New: ARM target using -O2 may cause unaligned access

2018-05-02 Thread denis_second at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85616 Bug ID: 85616 Summary: ARM target using -O2 may cause unaligned access Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug ipa/85617] New: Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions

2018-05-02 Thread danielgutson at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85617 Bug ID: 85617 Summary: Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/68197] negative index to ios_base::iword lead to unpredictable result

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68197 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 19:04:55 2018 New Revision: 259854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259854&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/68197 fail on negative iword/pword indices The suggested re

[Bug libstdc++/68197] negative index to ios_base::iword lead to unpredictable result

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68197 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85618] New: Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error

2018-05-02 Thread zefzsoftwares at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85618 Bug ID: 85618 Summary: Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/85619] New: Inconsistent descriptions for new warning options in GCC 8.1.0

2018-05-02 Thread julien at trigofacile dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85619 Bug ID: 85619 Summary: Inconsistent descriptions for new warning options in GCC 8.1.0 Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/85617] Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions

2018-05-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85617 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi

[Bug ipa/85617] Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions

2018-05-02 Thread danielgutson at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85617 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Gutson --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I doubt we want to make this warning to be flow sensitive at all. There are > many other warnings which are flow sensitive and they change behavior > between dif

[Bug middle-end/85620] New: getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

2018-05-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 Bug ID: 85620 Summary: getcontext is wrongly marked return twice Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-en

[Bug middle-end/85620] getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

2018-05-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85620] getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

2018-05-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getcontext.html If the ucp argument was created with getcontext(), program execution continues as if the corresponding call of getcontext() had just r

[Bug middle-end/85620] getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

2018-05-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

2018-05-02 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #6 from

[Bug middle-end/85620] swapcontext isn't marked return twice

2018-05-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > Technically, swapcontext only returns once, but not when it is called. > In that sense, it returns twice. Huh? For the purpose of ECF_RETURNS_TWICE, swapcontext does

[Bug ipa/85607] [9 Regression] ice in add_type, at ipa-icf.c:1583

2018-05-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Summary|ice in add_type,

[Bug fortran/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

2018-05-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug target/85613] [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test

2018-05-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85613 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/85621] New: savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

2018-05-02 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 Bug ID: 85621 Summary: savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug libgcc/85621] savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

2018-05-02 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Created attachment 44053 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44053&action=edit 0001-i386-savms-resms-mark-stack-non-executable-PR85621.patch

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

2018-05-02 Thread haberg-1 at telia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #22 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #16) > ...I meant to observe whether the example triggers a O(k^2) behavior. It > should be less than quadratic. ... > Here is the updated example, to re-arrange the expressi

[Bug target/85582] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2018-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85582 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 2 21:56:17 2018 New Revision: 259862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259862&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/85582 * config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_doubleword_m

[Bug target/85582] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2018-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85582 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85620] Missing ENDBR after swapcontext

2018-05-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
ia indirect branch. <<<<<<<<<<< Need ENDBR here. movl%eax, res(%rip) addq$8, %rsp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .cfi_endproc .LFE0: .size foo, .-foo .ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.1.1 20180

[Bug libgcc/85621] savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

2018-05-02 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com,

[Bug libgcc/85621] savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

2018-05-02 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/60277] Bogus "inline function virtual ..." used but never defined

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59655] incorrect diagnostic on templatized function with lambda parameter

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59655 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|2017-10-

[Bug other/85622] New: gcc-8.1.0/NEWS says it's not released yet

2018-05-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85622 Bug ID: 85622 Summary: gcc-8.1.0/NEWS says it's not released yet Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c/85623] New: strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

2018-05-02 Thread gandalf at winds dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 Bug ID: 85623 Summary: strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/81976] bad is_standard_layout/has_unique_object_representations results with a chain of empty bases

2018-05-02 Thread P at draigBrady dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81976 --- Comment #4 from Pádraig Brady --- According to the previous comment this depends on PR 82764 and the target milestone is 7.4

[Bug fortran/63371] kind() with function name (not call) as argument

2018-05-02 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63371 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr,

[Bug fortran/63371] kind() with function name (not call) as argument

2018-05-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63371 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/63363] No diagnostic for passing function as actual argument to KIND

2018-05-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63363 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

<    1   2   3