https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43932&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43934
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43934&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43935
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43935&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405
Bug ID: 85405
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at
ipa-devirt.c:1581
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43936
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43936&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43937
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43937&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43938
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43938&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #13 from Mart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #18 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
I'm sorry if it's not clear, English isn't my native language.
So to reiterate.
The normal, unoptimized path is:
World::update() simulates world which uses Random::get() on every person.
Random:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #19 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
I'm sorry if it's not clear, English isn't my native language.
So to reiterate.
The normal, unoptimized path is:
World::update() simulates world which uses Random::get() to generate a random
num
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42947
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> Created attachment 43931 [details]
Thanks for the patch Sergei. Are there any known drawbacks of dropping
SYSROOT_SUFFIX_SPEC support?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71235
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71235
--- Comment #3 from Mikhail Vorobyov ---
Maybe it should be said more precisely that -march isn't for all cores of
family but for only ones which have those extensions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85406
Bug ID: 85406
Summary: Unnecessary blend when vectorizing short-cutted
calculations
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85406
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen ---
Note it might be hard to figure out for the compiler that the result for a==255
will leave the input unchanged, but you can observe the same if you instead
test for a == 0 (and return 0). In that case the comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backporting to gcc-6 and -7 is possible. The patch applies cleanly and all
regression tests pass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85125
--- Comment #2 from John McFarlane ---
Here are two more:
constexpr int dubious_increment(int i) { return ++i + ++i; }
static_assert(dubious_increment(0) == 3);
constexpr int dubious_increment(int i) { return i; }
static_ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85407
Bug ID: 85407
Summary: Replace gcc_assert in module.c:read_module by more
helpful diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Jenner ---
Sorry for my lack of communication on this. Realistically, it doesn't look like
I'm going to be able to get the powerpcspe port to the appropriate state by the
GCC 8 rc1, so please feel free to deprecate or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
_Set8 wasn't supposed to be profitable before -- but this is an old test,
predating reasonable unaligned storage accesses with Power8 and later. We
should have vectorized both loops as soon as that came along
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81274
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #52 from W.H. Ding ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #48)
So, is there an old bug that covers my problem, or should I file a new one?
Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76995
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Apr 16 02:00:43 2018
New Revision: 259393
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259393&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc/testsuite]
2018-04-15 Bill Schmidt
PR testsuite/85326
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
Created attachment 43940
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43940&action=edit
c3 testcase dumps w/ -fselective-scheduling2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha ---
Created attachment 43941
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43941&action=edit
c3 testcase dumps w/o -fselective-scheduling2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83886
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc-8.0.0-alpha20180415 snapshot (r259389).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71235
--- Comment #4 from Jan De Kock ---
@Jakub, isn't that the whole point? To be the lowest common denominator?
In the case of silvermont, the desktop SKUs (Bay-Trail-D) and mobile SKUs
(Bay-Trail-M), both don't support AES. That's a pretty large g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84413
--- Comment #3 from Julia Koval ---
Author: jkoval
Date: Mon Apr 16 05:59:52 2018
New Revision: 259395
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259395&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add sse_unaligned_load_optimal and sse_unaligned_store_optimal to Skylake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||npickito at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
32 matches
Mail list logo
