[Bug gcov-profile/85217] New: [GCOV] A no side effect statement between a break statement and a continue statement will lead to incorrect code coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85217 Bug ID: 85217 Summary: [GCOV] A no side effect statement between a break statement and a continue statement will lead to incorrect code coverage in gcov Product: gcc

[Bug gcov-profile/85217] [GCOV] A no side effect statement between a break statement and a continue statement will lead to incorrect code coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85217 --- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang --- $ gcc -v gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1 Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configure

[Bug gcov-profile/85218] New: [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is wrongly marked as executed when there is an array index and an {array declare statement} around it in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85218 Bug ID: 85218 Summary: [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is wrongly marked as executed when there is an array index and an {array declare statement} around it in

[Bug gcov-profile/85199] [GCOV] A cond-expr with a iterative variable in a for loop is marked as "-" in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85199 --- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang --- (In reply to Yibiao Yang from comment #0) > $ gcc -v > gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper > OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none > OFF

[Bug gcov-profile/85219] New: [GCOV] A "if(1) continue;" statement in a the else block of "if(0)" statement is wrongly marked as executed when surrounded by array delaration statement and break/contin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85219 Bug ID: 85219 Summary: [GCOV] A "if(1) continue;" statement in a the else block of "if(0)" statement is wrongly marked as executed when surrounded by array delaration statement

[Bug c++/85215] [8 Regression] ICE: "gcc_assert (!force_elide);" failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 5 04:01:15 2018 New Revision: 259123 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259123&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/85215 - ICE with copy-init from conversion. * call

[Bug c++/85215] [8 Regression] ICE: "gcc_assert (!force_elide);" failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84979] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with auto as template parameter and -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Apr 5 04:26:36 2018 New Revision: 259124 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259124&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/84979] reject auto in explicit tmpl args for tmpl-fn With conc

[Bug c++/80290] [6/7/8 Regression] g++ uses unreasonable amount of memory compiling nested string maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug target/85220] New: [meta-bug, nvptx] Run trunk with og7 openacc testcases and analyze execution failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220 Bug ID: 85220 Summary: [meta-bug, nvptx] Run trunk with og7 openacc testcases and analyze execution failures Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/85220] [meta-bug, nvptx] Run trunk with og7 openacc testcases and analyze execution failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- I've copied the test-cases, and build r259123. For libgomp.oacc-c/c.exp, we get: ... $ cat libgomp.testsuite/libgomp.sum | grep ^FAIL:.*execution | grep -v /lib- | sed 's/libgomp.oacc-c\/..\/libgomp.oacc-c-c+

[Bug c++/85209] [8 Regression] ICE with lambda and structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug sanitizer/85213] [8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2402

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85213 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug target/85220] [meta-bug, nvptx] Run trunk with og7 openacc testcases and analyze execution failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- And for libgomp.oacc-fortran/fortran.exp: ... $ cat libgomp.testsuite/libgomp.sum | grep ^FAIL:.*execution | grep -v /lib- | sed 's/libgomp.oacc-fortran\///' FAIL: avoid-offloading-1.f -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia

[Bug fortran/77371] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug middle-end/85221] New: [openacc] ICE in install_var_field, at omp-low.c:657

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85221 Bug ID: 85221 Summary: [openacc] ICE in install_var_field, at omp-low.c:657 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug middle-end/85221] [openacc] ICE in install_var_field, at omp-low.c:657

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85221 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Same for declare-allocatable-3.f90 and declare-allocatable-4.f90: ... $ grep 'internal compiler error:.*install_var_field' libgomp.testsuite/libgomp.log | sed 's/.*\///' | sort -u declare-allocatable-1.f90:157

<    1   2   3