https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85108
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83319
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 83319, which changed state.
Bug 83319 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE on use of allocatable component in
derived type coarray defined in module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83319
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85092
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85107
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schlong at cock dot li
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85011
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85114
Bug ID: 85114
Summary: -fstack-check causes internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84993
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84930
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|nathan at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84974
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85115
Bug ID: 85115
Summary: Failure to (auto)vectorize sqrtf
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84883
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84818
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #0)
Maybe these tests should be limited to Linux targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85075
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Mar 29 00:06:31 2018
New Revision: 258943
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258943&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84912
* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (RS6000_BTM_POW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84033
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Hi Breno, the first gcc-8 has not yet been released (current aim is for a
release mid April), nor has there been a release from the gcc-7 or gcc-6
branches containing this bug fix. I missed out on gcc-7.3 by a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85116
Bug ID: 85116
Summary: std::min_element does not optimize well with inlined
predicate
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
--- Comment #5 from Nathaniel J. Smith ---
Julian, are you able to test the patch? I don't have a reproduction setup
currently...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84750
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84701
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83707
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85117
Bug ID: 85117
Summary: ARM: Wrong Warning Emits: parameter passing for
argument of type 'Handle' changed in GCC 7.1
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68222
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I think this is on purpose and unlikely to change.
No, __builtin_cpu_supports is used to enable parts that are able to execute
relevant instructions. So, HJ's pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
Severity|enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Comment on attachment 43793
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43793
A patch
>+ if ((ecx & bit_OSXSAVE))
>+{
>+ /* Check if XMM state and YMM state are saved. */
>+ unsigned i
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo