https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> > > 5 branch is closed
> >
> > You closed the PR, so does that mean yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85060
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85060
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85060
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or using constexpr, so no linking required to check the value:
struct CA {
constexpr int foo() const { return 42; }
};
template
struct CB : CA { };
template
struct CC : CB {
constexpr int bar() con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45433
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45433
--- Comment #4 from Bruno Haible ---
I am having the same error, even with option -C (which does not need a
-fmain=... option):
$ gcj -v -C HelloWorld.java
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/arch/x86-linux/gnu-inst-gcc/4.7.3/bin/gcj
Target: i68
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85061
Bug ID: 85061
Summary: ICE with __builtin_offsetof applied to static member
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84005
--- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Mar 24 10:52:34 2018
New Revision: 258833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use SCEV information when aligning for vectorisation (P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84005
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85062
Bug ID: 85062
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on alignas with parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85060
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In *.original dump we have in bar:
const int m = <<< error >>>;
(but no error was reported).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85059
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 85059, which changed state.
Bug 85059 Summary: Compiling with -Og should preserve variable values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85059
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fredrik at dolda2000 dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
Bug ID: 85063
Summary: Switch conversion in openacc routine introduces
unsupported construct
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85058
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 43748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43748&action=edit
Tentative patch
Currently doing:
- bootstrap & reg-test on x86_64, and
- build and libgomp reg-test on x86_64 wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 43749
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43749&action=edit
Updated tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70068
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85044
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42651
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Mar 24 16:31:57 2018
New Revision: 258834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258834&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-24 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/42651
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85064
Bug ID: 85064
Summary: [concepts] ICE with auto as template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85065
Bug ID: 85065
Summary: [concepts] ICE with invalid use of a concept
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42651
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85066
Bug ID: 85066
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-pr84986.c
scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70068
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 24 17:37:21 2018
New Revision: 258835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/70068
* expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70068
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still the same thing with current trunk.
Interestingly,
integer, parameter:: is(1)=(/(i,i=1,1)/)
integer, parameter :: x = is(1)
print *,x
end
is simplified correctl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85058
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I did wonder about that. So documenting _pdep_u32 is right, but we should not
call it a built-in, and should mention the header instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The dump for the test in comment 0 is
MAIN__ ()
{
integer(kind=4) i;
static integer(kind=4) is[1] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, ...,
9989, 9990, 9991, 9992, 9993, 9994, 9995, 9996, 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45433
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47815
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53525
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45391
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85067
Bug ID: 85067
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with volatile parameter in
defaulted copy-constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45927
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28457
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85068
Bug ID: 85068
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid covarint return
types
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85069
Bug ID: 85069
Summary: std::invoke_result returns a wrong type
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85069
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
P.S. std::result_of is implemented in terms of std::invoke_result, so they will
always give the same answer when asked the same question. I think your problem
is you're asking the wrong question.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85069
--- Comment #3 from Andrzej Krzemienski ---
You're correct. It is my bad. Sorry, I assumed they both had identical
interface. This ticket can be closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Committing to svn+ssh://jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk ...
A gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr69497.f90
M gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
M gcc/fortran/symbol.c
M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82806
Bug ID: 82806
Summary: Stabilize paths in assembler and dumps
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: driver
/8.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180324 (experimental) [trunk revision 258835] (GCC)
$
$ g++tk -std=c++11
58 matches
Mail list logo
