https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85031
Bug ID: 85031
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(field_accessor_p()/dfs_locate_field_accessor_pre())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43730
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43730&action=edit
gcc8-pr85029.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77941
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
>
>> Joseph, any suggestions? You mentioned that old
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 22 08:08:07 2018
New Revision: 258756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84854
* semantics.c (finish_if_stmt_cond): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE: |[7 Regression] ICE:
|u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85027
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85028
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85031
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85018
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 08:32:12 2018
New Revision: 258757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/85018
* dwarf2asm.c (dw2_output_indirect_cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032
Bug ID: 85032
Summary: Wrong non-constant condition for static assertion
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We *could* make the libstdc++ operator new call malloc repeatedly until it gets
something aligned to max_align_t, so that operator new and the C++ allocators
meet the alignment requirements.
But that seem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85033
Bug ID: 85033
Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_offsetof_1, at
c-family/c-common.c:6269
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58969
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|Wrong non-constan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85026
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85034
Bug ID: 85034
Summary: -O1 internal compiler error: in
elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85026
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com |
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
Sorry if my comment was too coarse-grained. My hypothesis that this is a
duplicate comes from playback_image_provider.ii looking like Chromium's
playback_image_provider.cc, which was failing to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035
Bug ID: 85035
Summary: nios2: adding -fdelete-null-pointer-checks with -O2
enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77941
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> It works on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (including running it),
> but the ICE remains on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Mar 22 10:21:12 2018
New Revision: 258758
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[tail-merge] Don't merge bbs with bb_has_abnormal_pred
2018-03-22 Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85026
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r240221 and stopped with r248863. Both these changes are generic
changes, so this likely used to be latent in 6.x and before and is latent again
on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85025
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85030
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
void
bar (int i)
{
struct S a;
asm volatile ("" : "=rm" (a) : "0" (i));
}
ICEs as well, but
int
baz (struct S a)
{
int i;
asm volatile ("" : "=rm" (i) : "0" (a));
return i;
}
is properly rejected:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Mar 22 10:39:43 2018
New Revision: 258759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258759&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport "[tail-merge] Don't merge bbs with bb_has_abnormal_pred"
2018-03-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85030
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Trying to create BLKmode subreg of something (or subreg from BLKmode) is not
going to work well, but don't know the LRA code enough to know how to safely
get out to the point where we can error out on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80092
--- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Mar 22 10:44:51 2018
New Revision: 258760
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258760&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport "Require effective target global_constructor for two testcases"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
Bug ID: 85036
Summary: --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada[,c++] fails
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Mar 22 11:01:15 2018
New Revision: 258762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport "[tail-merge] Don't merge bbs with bb_has_abnormal_pred"
2018-03-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I need the following. Not sure why we ever
need gcc/specs now (even for crosses) all specs should be builtin.
Note that original issue of course only happens if the host driver cannot
process the specs lang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85034
--- Comment #1 from Vegard Nossum ---
FWIW, gcc built from r258757 with asan gives:
:4:1: internal compiler error: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at
reload1.c:3633
/home/vegard/git/gcc/libbacktrace/elf.c:2891:22: runtime error: load of
misaligned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85027
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85025
--- Comment #1 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: itsimbal
Date: Thu Mar 22 11:22:31 2018
New Revision: 258763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR85025: libgcc/config/i386/shadow-stack-unwind.h is w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85025
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 85025, which changed state.
Bug 85025 Summary: libgcc/config/i386/shadow-stack-unwind.h is wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85025
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85034
--- Comment #2 from Vegard Nossum ---
(In reply to Vegard Nossum from comment #1)
> FWIW, gcc built from r258757 with asan gives:
Nevermind, the asan thing comes from the stack trace and is unrelated (it
appears for all stack traces regardless o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So one of the offending changes was done in r54614 which introduced the
dependency on libgcc build. Previously it looks like only cross builds
and install (and also fixincludes) depended on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82962
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #7)
> One thing that could be done instead is to mention the INTENTs of the
> arguments in the documentation:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/EXECUTE_005
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #5)
> Sorry if my comment was too coarse-grained. My hypothesis that this is a
> duplicate comes from playback_image_provider.ii looking like Chromium's
> pla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So the following is a better fix, the comment already explains how this is
wrong to do early.
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85037
Bug ID: 85037
Summary: SIGSEGV in gotools testsuite affects several tests
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85038
Bug ID: 85038
Summary: x32: unnecessary address-size prefix when a pointer
register is already zero-extended
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85026
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85039
Bug ID: 85039
Summary: nested_anon_class_index
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84941
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 12:31:46 2018
New Revision: 258764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR inline-asm/84941
* function.c (match_asm_constraints_1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Your example is not valid, and is rejected by GCC and Clang and EDG.
Ugh, I forgot to test it with clang before posting my comment. I stand
corrected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84941
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] internal |[6/7 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85039
--- Comment #1 from Vegard Nossum ---
Alternative testcase:
struct d {
} * d::b(__builtin_offsetof(struct {
struct a {
int c() { return .1f; }
};
}, ))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85040
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85040
Bug ID: 85040
Summary: [8 Regression] std::less fails when operator< is
overloaded
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85040
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84783
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Peryt ---
Proposed patch sent to list
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01181.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85038
--- Comment #1 from Peter Cordes ---
Correction for AArch64: it supports addressing modes with a 64-bit base
register + 32-bit index register with zero or sign extension for the 32-bit
index. But not 32-bit base registers.
As a hack that's bett
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85007
--- Comment #3 from Eric Reischer ---
No, it used gnatmake -P .
Is there a new recommended way to get gnatlink to generate a 32-bit bind file
and link object on MULTIARCH systems (x86/x86_64 in this specific case)? It
seems this would be functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Mar 22 13:33:29 2018
New Revision: 258766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
xfail experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc on 32-bit Solaris/x86
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> We *could* make the libstdc++ operator new call malloc repeatedly until it
> gets
> something aligned to max_align_t, so that operator new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth ---
Xfailed for GCC 8.1.
I'm leaving the PR open for the underlying issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
From PR 84896:
gcc 8 currently emits the following for:
std::pair foo;
error: 'pair' in namespace 'std' does not name a template type
std::pair foo;
^~~~
We ought to suggest including for this,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
*** Bug 84896 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84896
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77941
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 07:53:14AM +, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> It works on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (including running it), but the ICE remains on
> i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>
Janne, thanks for checking. 2_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85041
Bug ID: 85041
Summary: std::vector::data with -std=c++98 flag
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 22 14:14:06 2018
New Revision: 258770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84854
* semantics.c (finish_if_stmt_cond): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84927
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 22 14:17:03 2018
New Revision: 258771
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258771&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84927
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_bare_aggregate): U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 22 14:18:17 2018
New Revision: 258772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71638, ICE with NSDMI and reference.
* constexp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84927
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE on |[6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85040
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Mar 22 14:23:27 2018
New Revision: 258773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258773&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85040 fix std::less etc. ambiguities
PR libstdc++/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85040
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
Bug 78420 depends on bug 85040, which changed state.
Bug 85040 Summary: [8 Regression] std::less fails when operator< is
overloaded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85040
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77941
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7)
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 07:53:14AM +, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > It works on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (including running it), but the ICE remains
> > on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77941
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7)
> I suppose one could always check that a length type parameter
> less than some max integer based on 32-bit vs 64-bit system,
> but that would pessimize all uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85041
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
