https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84972
Bug ID: 84972
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
extended_tree, at tree.h:5545
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84905
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84644
vegard.nossum at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vegard.nossum at oracle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638
vegard.nossum at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vegard.nossum at oracle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:32:57 2018
New Revision: 258659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258659&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71834 - template-id with too few arguments.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84925
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:34:45 2018
New Revision: 258660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84925
* pt.c (enclosing_instantiation_of): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84925
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
See Comment 4: why 2 errors?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84927
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:46:16 2018
New Revision: 258661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84927
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_bare_aggregate): U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84643
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:46:23 2018
New Revision: 258662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/84643
* memmodel.h (enum memmodel): Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:47:29 2018
New Revision: 258663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/84761
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:48:39 2018
New Revision: 258664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78651
* dwarf2asm.c: Include fold-const.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84973
Bug ID: 84973
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(tree_check()/ultimate_transparent_alias_target())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84946
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:49:57 2018
New Revision: 258665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/84946
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c (m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 8+ so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84946
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 84643, which changed state.
Bug 84643 Summary: gcc/optabs.c:6549:26: runtime error: load of value 131075,
which is not a valid value for type 'memmodel'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84643
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84643
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 84946, which changed state.
Bug 84946 Summary: [8 Regression] UBSAN: in mem_valid_for_store_merging
../../gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:3951
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84946
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84927
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regressiion] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84974
Bug ID: 84974
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(ovl_first()/location_of())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84975
Bug ID: 84975
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(outer_binding()/lookup_name_real_1())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84976
Bug ID: 84976
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(cp_build_modify_expr())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84937
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84977
Bug ID: 84977
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(build_x_unary_op())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #25 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84978
Bug ID: 84978
Summary: ice in cxx_eval_constant_expression at
gcc/cp/constexpr.c:4109
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84978
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code:
typedef struct { struct a *b; } c;
typedef void (*d)(c *);
typedef struct a {
d e;
int f;
long g;
} h;
h i() {
h j;
((c *)j.f)->b->e(0);
return j;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348
--- Comment #21 from Harald Anlauf ---
I did not encounter any ICE with the test cases in this PR which I tried.
Have they been fixed by Steve's recent patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 19 22:03:01 2018
New Revision: 258666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84931
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84900
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Yes, I'd consider this invalid code. Presumably there's some issue with
the GNU extension allowing casts of structs to the same type, whereby in
some cases it fails to make the result of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49025
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979
Bug ID: 84979
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with auto as template parameter
and -fconcepts
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84980
Bug ID: 84980
Summary: [concepts] ICE with missing typename in cocept
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84980
--- Comment #1 from Volker Reichelt ---
That's of course "-fconcepts" instead of "-fconcpets".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 19 22:49:33 2018
New Revision: 258667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84931
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-29 00:00:00 |2018-3-19
--- Comment #13 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84981
Bug ID: 84981
Summary: C++17 allows function pointers with no linkage as
template parameters but gcc errors, stating the
function has no linkage
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84981
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> It should work in C++17, but is not the subject of this bug report.
That's now PR 84981.
For this PR, the only remaining bug seems to be comment 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84981
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And maybe also this for references as template arguments:
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -6259,7 +6259,8 @@ convert_nontype_argument_function (tree type, tree expr,
}
linkage = decl_linkag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42651
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818
DJ Delorie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilson at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42651
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submitted.
he non-merged not is a xor
with 1.
This happens on svn trunk as of today (8.0.1 20180319 (experimental)), the 8.0
provided by fedora (8.0.1 20180222 (Red Hat 8.0.1-0.16)), but does not happen
on the arch gcc version (7.3.1 20180312). If I figure out how to bisect with
SVN I might have time to bisec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660
--- Comment #7 from Kito Cheng ---
Hi Jim:
Thanks your update, we'll test that again, btw, we can also test on x86-64 and
aarch64 if you have no time to test other target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624
Orlando Arias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84983
Bug ID: 84983
Summary: [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/pr84828.C fail
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84983
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
Bug ID: 84984
Summary: internal compiler error: in build2, at tree.c:4686
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84985
Bug ID: 84985
Summary: internal compiler error: in match_reload, at
lra-constraints.c:1068
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inva
201 - 259 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
