[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 84859, which changed state. Bug 84859 Summary: [8 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/84859] [8 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 19 14:08:58 2018 New Revision: 258645 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258645&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/84859

[Bug tree-optimization/84859] [8 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84929] [8 Regression] ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected polynomial_chrec, have nop_expr in analyze_siv_subscript_cst_affine, at tree-data-ref.c:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84929 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84933] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:288 since r257852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84933 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84933] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:288 since r257852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84933 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 19 14:11:05 2018 New Revision: 258646 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258646&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/84933

[Bug ipa/84947] UBSAN: ipcp_bits_lattice::meet_with(generic_wide_int >, generic_wide_int >, unsigned int) ../../gcc/ipa-cp.c:1058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84947 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug tree-optimization/84935] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84935 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-03-19 10:08 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84935 > > --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Is that with r258590 in? I don't think h

[Bug tree-optimization/84935] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84935 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84935 > > --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Is that with r258590 in? I don't think hppa

[Bug ipa/84947] UBSAN: ipcp_bits_lattice::meet_with(generic_wide_int >, generic_wide_int >, unsigned int) ../../gcc/ipa-cp.c:1058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84947 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- bool propagate_bits_across_jump_function (cgraph_edge *cs, int idx, ipa_jump_func *jfunc, ipcp_bits_lattice *dest_lattice) { ... /*

[Bug ipa/84947] UBSAN: ipcp_bits_lattice::meet_with(generic_wide_int >, generic_wide_int >, unsigned int) ../../gcc/ipa-cp.c:1058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84947 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > bool > propagate_bits_across_jump_function (cgraph_edge *cs, int idx, > ipa_jump_func *jfunc, >

[Bug tree-optimization/84935] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84935 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems it actually is vectorized, probably just using DImode vectors for 2xSImode, and dom doesn't handle vector stores followed by scalar loads. Before store-merging the dump is: MEM[(int *)&a] = { 0, 1 };

[Bug tree-optimization/84935] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84935 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84935 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Seems it actually is vectorized, probably ju

[Bug ipa/84947] UBSAN: ipcp_bits_lattice::meet_with(generic_wide_int >, generic_wide_int >, unsigned int) ../../gcc/ipa-cp.c:1058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84947 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- I can confirm it works for me: diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.c b/gcc/ipa-cp.c index ee41a8d55b7..96fff686a3a 100644 --- a/gcc/ipa-cp.c +++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.c @@ -1813,7 +1813,8 @@ propagate_bits_across_jump_function (c

[Bug middle-end/83665] [8 regression] Big code size regression and some code quality improvement at Jan 2 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- Honza, may I close this as fixed?

[Bug c++/84920] Better handling of unmatched/ambiguous calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84920 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0) > As reported by user "jcoffland" on Hacker News: > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16598071 > > > One improvement I'd like to see is a simplified error mes

[Bug c++/58713] error: cannot bind ‘std::ostream {aka std::basic_ostream}’ lvalue to ‘std::basic_ostream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #3) > A possible fix might be to change the Standard ;-) Despite the smiley I > seriously consider to make the proposal/open an issue that the "all-eating" > signatu

[Bug c++/58713] error: cannot bind ‘std::ostream {aka std::basic_ostream}’ lvalue to ‘std::basic_ostream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84759] Calculation of quotient and remainder with constant denominator uses __umoddi3+__udivdi3 instead of __udivmoddi4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84759 --- Comment #2 from jimis --- *** Bug 54183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/54183] Generate __udivmoddi4 instead of __udivdi3 plus __umoddi3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54183 jimis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84919] [8 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Not aware of any right now, but 1) if the format string is not compile time known, we don't know if it is %p or not 2) the format string parsing is done in other passes (-Wformat code in FEs, and gimple-ssa-s

[Bug c/84919] [8 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Not aware of any right now, but 1) if the format string is not compile time > known, we don't know if it is %p or not 2) the format string parsing is done We only need

[Bug c++/84927] [7/8 Regressiion] ICE with NSDMI and reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84927 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/84891] -fno-signed-zeros leads to optimization which should be possible only if also -ffinite-math-only is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84891 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:46:11AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84891 > > Richard Biener changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/82965] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c starts failing after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965 --- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #10 from bin.cheng --- > a proposed patch @https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02419.html I've regtested the patch on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2

[Bug tree-optimization/84005] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84005 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> --- [...] > Could you try the attached patch? It should restore the ability > to look through steps when trying to align vari

[Bug c/84919] [8 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > Not aware of any right now, but 1) if the format string is not compile time > > known, we don't know if it is %p or not 2) th

[Bug middle-end/84891] -fno-signed-zeros leads to optimization which should be possible only if also -ffinite-math-only is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84891 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:01:17AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > I can't find anything in the Fortran2008 standard specifying how > > arithmetic on intrinsic complex types work. CCing two Fortran maintainers >

[Bug libstdc++/84949] -ffast-math bugged with respect to NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84949 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Lipka --- Having dug a bit deeper, I notice another way in which NaNs are broken in -ffinite-math-only mode: Normally, NaNs should always compare NON-EQUAL, even when compared to itself. In -ffinite-math-only mode,

[Bug c/84919] [8 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/84952] New: [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 Bug ID: 84952 Summary: [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/84943] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_call_a, at cp/call.c:374

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84943 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/84945] [8 Regression] UBSAN: gcc/config/i386/i386.c:33312:22: runtime error: shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84945 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43696|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/84901] --dynamic-list=export is ignored in presence of -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84901 --- Comment #2 from Alex Khatskevich --- It seems, like the commit (20 sep) https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2017-09/msg00172.html fixes the issue in gold.

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- For stage1, I have the following patch set: ... git log --pretty=%s --reverse HEAD^^^..HEAD | cat -n 1 Fix branch-around-nothing 2 Fix bar.sync position 3 Verify bar.sync position ... where 1

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43703 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43703&action=edit 0001-Fix-branch-around-nothing.patch

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43704 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43704&action=edit 0002-Fix-bar.sync-position.patch

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43705 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43705&action=edit 0003-Verify-bar.sync-position.patch

[Bug c/84919] [8 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #11) > > Until then, the only way to avoid the warning that I can think of is to > exclude from checking arguments passed through the ellipsis, but that will > result in som

[Bug c/84953] New: misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 Bug ID: 84953 Summary: misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"") Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/84954] New: [nvptx] prevent_branch_around_nothing doesn't trigger often enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84954 Bug ID: 84954 Summary: [nvptx] prevent_branch_around_nothing doesn't trigger often enough Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84905] Improve warning for __attribute__((const)) on function returning void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84905 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/84574] Function return thunks shouldn't be aliased to indirect branch thunks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84574 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Mar 19 16:52:13 2018 New Revision: 258647 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258647&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Don't generate alias for function return thunk Function retu

[Bug target/84954] [nvptx] prevent_branch_around_nothing doesn't trigger often enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84954 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43706 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43706&action=edit Tentative patch

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- For stage4, however, we want a fix without fixing optimization issue PR84025, so we have: ... $ git log --pretty=%s --reverse HEAD^^..HEAD | cat -n 1 Fix bar.sync position 2 Verify bar.sync positi

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43707 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43707&action=edit 0001-Fix-bar.sync-position.patch (stage4)

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43708 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43708&action=edit 0002-Verify-bar.sync-position.patch (stage4)

[Bug target/84952] [nvptx] bar.sync generated in divergent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84952 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5) > For stage4, however, we want a fix without fixing optimization issue > PR84025 > ... > @ %r34 bra.uni $L8; > @ %r33 bra $L9; > // join 2; > $L9: > $L8: >

[Bug tree-optimization/84946] [8 Regression] UBSAN: in mem_valid_for_store_merging ../../gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:3951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84946 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/84905] Improve warning for __attribute__((const)) on function returning void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84905 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- No suggestions here, I was just passing on it on. My response on IRC was pretty much what you said: you need to read the manual to know what the attribute does, the warning is not the place to put that info

[Bug libstdc++/84949] -ffast-math bugged with respect to NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84949 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84826] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug lto/84934] Installing the lto plugin where binutils will look for it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Comment #3 from Дилян Палаузов --- For LLVM I filled the same request: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36802 .

[Bug lto/84901] --dynamic-list=export is ignored in presence of -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84901 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84953] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- DEF_LIB_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_STRPBRK, "strpbrk", BT_FN_STRING_CONST_STRING_CONST_STRING, ATTR_PURE_NOTHROW_NONNULL_LEAF) DEF_FUNCTION_TYPE_2 (BT_FN_STRING_CONST_STRING_CONST_STRING,

[Bug fortran/84615] [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for some tests compiled with -m32 after r256284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c/84953] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84953] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/builtins.c.jj 2018-03-07 22:51:58.871478732 +0100 +++ gcc/builtins.c 2018-03-19 18:49:45.313898848 +0100 @@ -9573,7 +9573,7 @@ fold_builtin_strpbrk (location_t loc, tr if (p2[0] == '\0')

[Bug middle-end/70359] [6/7/8 Regression] Code size increase for x86/ARM/others compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #42 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #36) > WRT the division removal. That seems so profitable that a slight increase > in codesize is warranted. So if we fix the other issue and the source of > the

[Bug bootstrap/84856] Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856 --- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson --- Author: wilson Date: Mon Mar 19 18:08:24 2018 New Revision: 258650 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258650&root=gcc&view=rev Log: RISC-V: Fix bootstrap failure. gcc/ PR bootstrap/84856

[Bug bootstrap/84856] Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84826] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c/84953] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43710 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43710&action=edit gcc8-pr84953.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/84955] [7/8 Regression] ICE in substitute_and_fold_dom_walker, at tree-ssa-propagate.c:1089

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- Configured with --enable-checking=yes : $ gfortran-8-20180318 -c z1.f90 -O2 -fopenacc during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg z1.f90:11:0: end internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:841 0xd2490f vec::ope

[Bug fortran/84955] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in substitute_and_fold_dom_walker, at tree-ssa-propagate.c:1089

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 Bug ID: 84955 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in substitute_and_fold_dom_walker, at tree-ssa-propagate.c:1089 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger --- WOW! That was quick! Note that strpbrk(p, "") is certainly worth a warning: in the original context the second parameter was the result from a macro substitution, that was far from obvious to spot, and strp

[Bug c/84956] New: ICE in replace_block_by, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956 Bug ID: 84956 Summary: ICE in replace_block_by, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1546 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug fortran/65453] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65453 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Mar 19 18:36:29 2018 New Revision: 258652 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258652&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/65453

[Bug fortran/84957] New: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84957 Bug ID: 84957 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2255 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] New: int loads not eliminated against larger stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 Bug ID: 84958 Summary: int loads not eliminated against larger stores Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 --- Comment #9 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sudi Date: Mon Mar 19 18:50:32 2018 New Revision: 258653 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258653&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR81647][AARCH64] Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch6

[Bug fortran/77414] ICE in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Mar 19 18:54:29 2018 New Revision: 258654 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258654&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/77414

[Bug c++/84835] [8 Regression] ICE in add_method, at cp/class.c:996

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84835 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84835] [8 Regression] ICE in add_method, at cp/class.c:996

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84835 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Mon Mar 19 18:56:22 2018 New Revision: 258655 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258655&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/84835] ICE with generic lambda in extern "C" https://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- I disagree, it is a well documented behavior and user gets exactly what he asked for. There is no questionable or problematic behavior with those options. It is not any different from strchr ("abcd", 'e') a

[Bug target/84908] retpoline weirdness: 7.3.0-1 and 4.8.5-16: with -fPIC: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `__x86_indirect_thunk_rax'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84908 --- Comment #8 from Jason Vas Dias --- Thanks for the clarification, and I hope the kernel developers stop compiling the mainline vDSO with -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register . But there are still a few things I am trying

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-03/msg00566.html : Author: vries Date: Mon Mar 19 19:12:53 2018 New Revision: 258656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258656&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [testsuite] Add nvp

[Bug fortran/65453] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65453 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Mar 19 19:14:06 2018 New Revision: 258657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/65453

[Bug fortran/65453] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65453 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/77414] ICE in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- Well, okay then... Thanks!

[Bug c++/84959] New: internal compiler error: in store_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:6549 (store_binding()/store_class_binding())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84959 Bug ID: 84959 Summary: internal compiler error: in store_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:6549 (store_binding()/store_class_binding()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1

[Bug c++/84960] New: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84960 Bug ID: 84960 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84961] New: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961 Bug ID: 84961 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84962] New: internal compiler error: in get_fns, at cp/tree.c:2505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84962 Bug ID: 84962 Summary: internal compiler error: in get_fns, at cp/tree.c:2505 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/84963] New: [8 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84963 Bug ID: 84963 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2955 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/84964] New: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 Bug ID: 84964 Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:4540 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug Duplication Problem] Survey Invite

I've invited you to fill out the following form: Professional Profile To fill it out, visit: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfQTZkrylE1t49gjzewPQSPWHFnPtGCZfRujg_G8VTwqGrbHg/viewform?c=0&w=1&usp=mail_form_link Dear friend, I am a master's student in Computer Science at the Federal Uni

[Bug c++/84965] New: internal compiler error: unexpected expression '__alignof__ (({...}))' of kind alignof_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84965 Bug ID: 84965 Summary: internal compiler error: unexpected expression '__alignof__ (({...}))' of kind alignof_expr Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug inline-asm/84966] New: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed (verify_gimple_in_cfg())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84966 Bug ID: 84966 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed (verify_gimple_in_cfg()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-i

[Bug c++/81837] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837 vegard.nossum at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vegard.nossum at oracle

[Bug c++/84967] New: internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_array, at cp/typeck2.c:1324

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84967 Bug ID: 84967 Summary: internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_array, at cp/typeck2.c:1324 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords

[Bug c++/84968] New: internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs_expr, at cp/tree.c:1792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84968 Bug ID: 84968 Summary: internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs_expr, at cp/tree.c:1792 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-inval

[Bug tree-optimization/84969] New: [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 Bug ID: 84969 Summary: [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/84969] [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-3-19 Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/78651] Incorrect exception handling when catch clause uses local class and PIC and sanitizer are active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651 --- Comment #6 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Mon Mar 19 19:59:56 2018 New Revision: 258658 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258658&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Maxim Ostapenko gcc/ PR sanitizer/78

[Bug c++/84970] New: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84970 Bug ID: 84970 Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15085 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/84971] New: internal compiler error: in build_non_dependent_expr, at cp/pt.c:25367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84971 Bug ID: 84971 Summary: internal compiler error: in build_non_dependent_expr, at cp/pt.c:25367 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-i

[Bug tree-optimization/84969] [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org

<    1   2   3   >