https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Probably related to PR59948, PR81000, etc. (I didn't look closely)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84825
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84825
Bug ID: 84825
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in rebuild_frequencies, at
predict.c:4002
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
Bug ID: 84826
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84806
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84827
Bug ID: 84827
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84828
Bug ID: 84828
Summary: ICE in verify_flow_info at gcc/cfghooks.c:265
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84808
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84804
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
Felix Fietkau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nbd at nbd dot name
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
Bug ID: 84829
Summary: -mieee-fp causes to link with -lieee but that is no
longer available
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84830
Bug ID: 84830
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at
tree-ssa-pre.c:2388
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
GCC 8 has the patch now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 12 08:45:54 2018
New Revision: 258444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258444&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84777
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clm at codesourcery dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
--- Comment #5 from linzj ---
Change the function call to printf to asm like:
int main() {
// printf("%d", getFunc(1)(1, 1));
asm volatile(""
:
: "r"(getFunc(1)(1, 1)));
return 0;
}
Will generate the concise code.
I think
# USE =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84813
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 12 09:02:36 2018
New Revision: 258445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84813
* g++.dg/debug/pr84813.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Version|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84820
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0.1
Target Milestone|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
This looks an ICE on invalid code though since the ODR is violated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84822
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Simplified testcase for the testsuite:
/* PR target/84786 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-mavx512f -mno-avx512vl -O2" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target avx512f } */
#include "avx512f-check.h"
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So the reason is that data-ref analysis doesn't consider
# VUSE <.MEM_20>
_12 = MEM[(char *)"" + 1B];
as a load. It's an out-of-bound read which we don't fold optimistically
or replace with a trap.
At th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
looks like it is working with r258445.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84778
--- Comment #3 from david.applegate at woodplc dot com ---
Thanks for the reply and the clarification.
I have two comments to make regarding this if I may...
1) Previous gfortran compilers were happy with the code. I also tested g95 and
Ifort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r238696.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43628
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43628&action=edit
gcc8-pr84786.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm, the epilogue expansion in arm.md hits the HAVE_return path and does:
emit_jump_insn (gen_return ());
with a comment saying:
/* HAVE_return is testing for USE_RETURN_INSN (FALSE). Hen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
Bug ID: 84831
Summary: Invalid memory read in parse_output_constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84808
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43629
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43629&action=edit
gcc8-pr84808.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Looks like Peter was able to help you on the binutils forum over the weekend.
Thanks, Peter!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84804
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84812
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
We have an ordering issue because of forward declarations:
class XclImpRoot : XclRoot {};
class XclImpColRowSettings : XclImpRoot {};
register_odr_type called on XclImpRoot causes get_odr_type to assign the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43630
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43630&action=edit
gcc8-pr84831.patch
Untested fix (large only because of the reindentation).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 12 12:32:28 2018
New Revision: 258446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84803
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
diff -upbd of that for better readability.
--- gcc/stmt.c.jj 2018-01-03 10:19:55.150533956 +0100
+++ gcc/stmt.c 2018-03-12 13:25:03.790733765 +0100
@@ -247,7 +247,8 @@ parse_output_constraint (const c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> diff -upbd of that for better readability.
>
> --- gcc/stmt.c.jj 2018-01-03 10:19:55.150533956 +0100
> +++ gcc/stmt.c2018-03-12 13:25:03.790733765 +0100
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84801
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That patch has been reverted in r258415.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84802
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 12 12:58:38 2018
New Revision: 258447
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258447&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84802 - ICE capturing uninstantiated class.
* lamb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r202540. Before that:
error: parameter declared ‘auto’
constexpr auto x = S::value;
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81740
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Eventually PR60276 is related for which I introduced STMT_VINFO_MIN_NEG_DIST
which is checked just by vectorizable_load (vectorizable_store didn't support
negative distances at the time). One part says
/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84795
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Mar 12 13:32:44 2018
New Revision: 258448
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258448&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR 84799
This was introduced by r258390 and fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r208157.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Mar 12 13:33:38 2018
New Revision: 258449
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258449&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR 84821
This was introduced by r258390 and fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Compiler support for char16_t and char32_t has been complete for many years.
The libstdc++ support required by the standard has been complete since GCC 5.1,
but I don't know if Paolo had more in mind (we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Outside of lambdas the patch essentially changed an error diagnostic to
else if (cxx_dialect < cxx1y)
pedwarn (location_of (type), 0,
"use of % in param
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84485
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Mar 12 13:50:52 2018
New Revision: 258450
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258450&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't vectorise zero-step rmw operations (PR 84485)
GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84485
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression] Vectorising
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84676
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84806
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84820
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84802
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
--- Comment #9 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> Created attachment 43631 [details]
> proposed patch
>
> I cannot reproduce that exact generated code; maybe it needs tuning for some
> particular CPU?
>
> C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84355
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 12 14:40:45 2018
New Revision: 258451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84355 - ICE with deduction for member class template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84827
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45616
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84832
Bug ID: 84832
Summary: Base class member function incorrectly introduced by
using-declarator
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd say the right thing is to keep libieee.a around, even if it will be an
empty ar archive.
GCC is not the linker and doesn't have the library search logic the linker has,
so it is hard to add -lieee for -m
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
