https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84670
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84714
Bug ID: 84714
Summary: internal compiler error: in create_tmp_var, at
gimple-expr.c:476
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#include
#include
template
constexpr char to_char(alphabet_type const alph)
{
return alph.to_char();
}
constexpr const char *check[][3] = {
{ "ACGT", __null, __null },
{ "ACGT", "-", __null },
{ "ACG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43562
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43562&action=edit
pr84684-7.ii
Even with this simplified version I still get:
pr84684-6.C: In instantiation of ‘static constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84497
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Mar 5 13:48:43 2018
New Revision: 258244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84497] ref to undefined tls init
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84497
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994
Bug 59994 depends on bug 84497, which changed state.
Bug 84497 Summary: link errors with trivial external thread_local variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84497
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #13 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84715
Bug ID: 84715
Summary: "./configure --disable-multilib && make" fails due to
"g++: error: gengtype-lex.c: No such file or
directory"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84715
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Don't run ./configure in the source dir:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure
If you're building a snapshot or modifying the source, you need Flex:
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html#Tools_00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84694
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #3 from N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In the debugger when looking at cxx_eval_call_expression
union_composition<0, dna4>::value_to_char_helper<4, dna4> (TARGET_EXPR
);
I see:
(gdb) p debug_generic_stmt (result)
{._M_elems={65, 67, 67, 84}}
whic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84686
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 5 14:28:07 2018
New Revision: 258245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84686 - missing volatile loads.
* cvt.c (convert_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84686
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 5 14:28:15 2018
New Revision: 258246
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258246&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84686 - missing volatile loads.
* cvt.c (convert_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Seems like another of the wrong caching issues. I can't reproduce it on my
laptop though; can you figure out where the first call, the one which ends up
cached in the constexpr_call_table originates?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84114
--- Comment #7 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Mon Mar 5 14:40:55 2018
New Revision: 258248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR84114: Avoid reassociating FMA
As discussed in the PR, the reassociat
del: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180305 (experimental) (svn-revision-258242)
Findings:
- Delta reduction for isl_factorization.c is attached
- Locally compiled with:
/Gcc/8.0.1/.bld/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/Gcc/8.0.1/.bld/./prev-gcc/
-B/Gcc/8.0.1/x86_64-apple-darwin17/bin/ -B/Gcc/8.0.1/x86_64-apple-darwin1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84708
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84486
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 5 15:00:48 2018
New Revision: 258249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84486
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[7/8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84670
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario-baumann at web dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84717
Bug ID: 84717
Summary: C compiler accepts fortran style suffix "d" with float
number but result is strange
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If the in-place modification of the CONSTRUCTOR in these cases are intentional,
the fix could be:
if (entry == NULL)
{
/* We need to keep a pointer to the entry, not just the slot,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84717
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to stiefschmied from comment #0)
> I think this is a compiler bug? The example code is attached.
No. Compile with -Wpedantic and you see why it's accepted:
84717.c:3:21: warning: suffix for doub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161
--- Comment #15 from Bruno Haible ---
> I think the following test case does show what Bruno was trying to prove.
Yes, the test case from comment 14 much better reflects what this bug report is
about, than the one from comment 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84714
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84717
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84713
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 5 15:40:15 2018
New Revision: 258250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-03-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84618
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 84618, which changed state.
Bug 84618 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:460
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84709
--- Comment #2 from Jose Dapena Paz ---
OK, just for understanding all the edges of this...
So the fact that in namespace B A::Foo the full A::Foo name is still accessible
is not relevant right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84686
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Mar 5 15:52:11 2018
New Revision: 258251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/84264
* config/rs6000/vector.md (mov): Di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84687
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43565
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43565&action=edit
gcc8-pr84687.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 5 16:01:03 2018
New Revision: 258252
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258252&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84524
* config/i386/sse.md (*3): Replace with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84718
Bug ID: 84718
Summary: [8 regression] ICE when compiling chromium
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: midd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84718
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 43567
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43567&action=edit
spdy_alt_svc_wire_format.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84718
--- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 43568
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43568&action=edit
spdy_alt_svc_wire_format.ii.gz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84718
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Dup of bug 84670?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84718
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
I will update my gcc build and check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 5 16:09:49 2018
New Revision: 258253
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258253&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84524
* config/i386/sse.md (*3): Replace with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84694
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84694
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Mar 5 16:12:07 2018
New Revision: 258254
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258254&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84694] ICE on template friend decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
David, any idea about how to handle this? Otherwise I'm afraid that the new
LTO warning framework looks rather counter-productive if it makes it easier to
write tests that fail on half of the platforms...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84707
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Mar 5 16:15:35 2018
New Revision: 258255
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258255&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84707
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Check DECL_NAM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84707
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84564
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 5 16:24:43 2018
New Revision: 258256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258256&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84564
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_ok_for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84564
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71832
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
Bug ID: 84719
Summary: gcc's __builtin_memcpy performance with certain number
of bytes is terrible compared to clang's
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84720
Bug ID: 84720
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree
that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have
'error_mark' in decl_anon_ns_mem_p, at cp/tree.c:3472
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84683
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
--- Comment #2 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does -mcpu=native improve it?
> Also is GCC calling memcpy instead of doing an inline version?
No -march=native does not make any difference.
And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84670
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linux at carewolf dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84718
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371
--- Comment #6 from Will Schmidt ---
Author: willschm
Date: Mon Mar 5 17:11:16 2018
New Revision: 258257
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258257&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-05 Will Schmidt
Backport from trunk.
2018-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.0
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
I think this is the fix:
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
@@ -1251,8 +1251,7 @@ massage_init_elt (tree type, tree init, int nested,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
init = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (ini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin17.4.0 |x86_64
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
I compare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 43571
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43571&action=edit
Tentative patch
Works on nvptx for the examples from comment 0, comment 3 and comment 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721
Bug ID: 84721
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in c_push_function_context, at
c-decl.c:9667
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84722
Bug ID: 84722
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in create_dispatcher_calls, at
multiple_target.c:147
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84723
Bug ID: 84723
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in create_target_clone, at
multiple_target.c:275
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84700
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That patch is pre-approved if it tests fine. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
--- Comment #5 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com ---
Which gcc and which clang ?
Because on my platform, in the above code, if you isolate 3 bytes at a time and
5 bytes at a time it is way slower than clang (by doing manual unrolling).
Or maybe it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84709
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right, it's not relevant. The rule is not really about hiding ::Foo and making
a name inaccessible, it's about the name "Foo" changing meaning in the class
scope.
Consider:
struct Foo { };
struct Bar {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
--- Comment #6 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com ---
If you compile the following code (-O3 being the only flag used) :
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
const uint64_t s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84702
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84702
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Mar 5 18:44:24 2018
New Revision: 258258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84702] ICE with default tmpl arg of overload set
https://gcc.gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if this is not __builtin_memcpy but rather how to optimize and putting
in the lower bytes of an uint64_t. I think your benchmark is not benchmarking
what you think it is benchmarking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84724
Bug ID: 84724
Summary: internal compiler error: in single_succ_edge, at
basic-block.h:339
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84570
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84725
Bug ID: 84725
Summary: enable attribute nonstring for all narrow character
types
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84725
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P5
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84571
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moezzia at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60230
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 60230, which changed state.
Bug 60230 Summary: internal compiler error on lambdas capturing
multidimensional arrays with dynamic boundary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60230
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84726
Bug ID: 84726
Summary: [8 regression] Unnecessary lambda capture of constant
variables
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84726
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84726
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
101 - 200 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
