https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84631
--- Comment #3 from Jay ---
The star isn't matching anything, so it tries to create star.
I did set -ex to debug but I don't that is causing the problem.
Perhaps on other systems it does actually create star, but nobody noticed?
I'll have to ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84638
Bug ID: 84638
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed (error:
invalid rhs for gimple memory store)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84639
Bug ID: 84639
Summary: gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c:1822:27: runtime error: shift
exponent -1 is negative
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84640
Bug ID: 84640
Summary: gcc/fortran/simplify.c:2587:9: runtime error: pointer
index expression with base 0x090de160 overflowed
to 0xc0632960
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84641
Bug ID: 84641
Summary: gcc/ipa-pure-const.c:1951:22: runtime error: load of
value 66, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84642
Bug ID: 84642
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(tree_check()/synthesize_implicit_template_parm())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Mar 1 08:22:06 2018
New Revision: 258094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Tighten use of HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM in alias.c (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84643
Bug ID: 84643
Summary: gcc/optabs.c:6549:26: runtime error: load of value
131075, which is not a valid value for type 'memmodel'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84634
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84644
Bug ID: 84644
Summary: internal compiler error: in
warn_misplaced_attr_for_class_type, at cp/decl.c:4718
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Mar 1 08:30:20 2018
New Revision: 258095
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-01 Richard Sandiford
gcc/testsuite/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82484
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84645
Bug ID: 84645
Summary: -flto -g0 at compile-time vs. -flto -g at link time
ICEs in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4353
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 84638, which changed state.
Bug 84638 Summary: [8 Regression] -fsanitize=address internal compiler error:
verify_gimple failed (error: invalid rhs for gimple memory store)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8463
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82484
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vegard.nossum at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #30)
> > However I have restore my testing of the gfortran test suite with -g -flto
> > and I see the following new failures:
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83901
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84631
Jay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Mar 1 08:56:31 2018
New Revision: 258097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/84538
* class.c (class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
>
> --- Comment #27 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> WRT c#21. There is a good paper from Click
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #5 from Pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84612
--- Comment #3 from niva at niisi dot msk.ru ---
Thank you very much!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84639
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Can be fixed by moving the checking a bit above:
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
@@ -1818,6 +1818,13 @@ common_handle_aligned_attribute (tree *node, tree name,
tree args, int fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64920
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84633
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84632
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84636
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84631
--- Comment #5 from Jay ---
I confirmed.
Here is what you can.
Build out of tree, of course.
cd fixincludes
make check
while it is printing "fixed...", press control-c
ls tests/inc
You will see a directory named "*".
Creating this works on Mac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84644
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84633
--- Comment #2 from Vegard Nossum ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> (In reply to Vegard Nossum from comment #0)
> > 7.3.0 seems fine.
>
> I think you're testing with a compiler built with --enable-checking=release
> so it doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction, wrong-code
ee check: expected record_type or
union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in
reduced_constant_expression_p, at cp/constexpr.c:1778
$ xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180301 (experimental)
$ cc1plus -version
GNU C++14 (GCC) version 8.0.1 20180301 (experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84632
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jay from comment #4)
> Incorrect bug.
Correct place was bug 84628 comment #6, for any confused onlookers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646
Bug ID: 84646
Summary: Missed optimisation for hoisting conditions outside
nested loops
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84623
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43533
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43533&action=edit
gcc8-pr84628.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84219
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Mar 1 11:06:18 2018
New Revision: 258098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/84219
* target-memory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64914
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84625
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64914
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=84
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84629
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64327
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61910
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61907
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66159
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This keeps biting me in the Filesystem library, where I need to use an
elaborated-type-specifier to refer to struct stat, to disambiguate it from the
function int stat(const char*, struct stat*)
struct sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
I haven't run bootstrap-ubsan in a while so I don't know, but those old logs
are definitely useless now. So we can close this I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 59545, which changed state.
Bug 59545 Summary: Signed integer overflow issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84641
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Same can be seen with valgrind:
$ valgrind --leak-check=yes --trace-children=yes ./xgcc -B.
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr71633.C -c -O3 -mmpx -O2
-std=gnu++11 -fcheck-pointer-bounds
--version
xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180301 (experimental)
Built from git c435a9e730c6e8f10da09d58b4fc9aaeb401b0d5 (r258097).
It seems to have been introduced between 5.5.0 and 6.1.0.
Test case was minimised by C-Reduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
> Bisected to pauls r254427, the fix for PR81447 and PR82783.
>
> Test adjustments suggest that we'll create even more malloc/free calls.
Hi Richard,
I am sorry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Bug 82005 depends on bug 84645, which changed state.
Bug 84645 Summary: -flto -g0 at compile-time vs. -flto -g at link time ICEs in
add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4353
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84645
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84645
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 1 13:39:56 2018
New Revision: 258100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-01 Richard Biener
PR debug/84645
* dwarf2ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
--- Comment #34 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #30)
> > > However I have restore my testing of the gfortran test suite with -g -flto
> > > and I see the follo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66159
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Patch for stage 1:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 4fa546a086c..4dc4e751b28 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -17818,9 +17818,11 @@ cp_parser_elaborated_type_specif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Looks like a duplicate of PR71536
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43536
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43536&action=edit
gcc8-pr80546.patch
The following completely untested patch fixes this. Probably other mov
patterns need inspec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84647
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84648
Bug ID: 84648
Summary: Missed optimization : loop not removed.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84642
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84642
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Vegard Nossum from comment #0)
> Seems potentially related to bug #84610?
Similar backtraces - and they both started with same commit - though this one
is a read-through-NULL, whereas bug #84610
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82484
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Mar 1 14:54:10 2018
New Revision: 258101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not handled volatile arguments (PR sanitizer/82484).
2018-03-01 Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82484
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84630
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84649
Bug ID: 84649
Summary: -Wstringop-truncation shouldn't warn on strncat() when
2nd argument is a char array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84650
Bug ID: 84650
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
create_new_iv)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Unfortunately it breaks bootstrap on powerpc64le-linux:
> ../../../libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__mulvti3’:
> ../../../libgcc/libgcc2.c:396:1: internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84005
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84623
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569
--- Comment #6 from Oliver Tale-Yazdi ---
It seems to be only dependent on the template specialization of the member.
–––
template
struct A {
template
static U u;
};
template
template
U A:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84642
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84647
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70875
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70875
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, why do you think so? Something miscompiled on some target? If so, which?
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo