https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
--- Comment #15 from Romain Geissler ---
Hi,
This latest patch seems to fix the occurences I have in my own code. Thanks ;)
Cheers,
Romain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.3.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
Bug ID: 84582
Summary: [8 Regression] Rejected valid C++ code since r257961
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84583
Bug ID: 84583
Summary: -fdirectives-only does not handle CRLF properly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84575
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 27 08:44:48 2018
New Revision: 258030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84575
* gcc.target/i386/pr84309.c: Add -mno-avx2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #23 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
...
> Isn't that
> an old data file you forgot to remove?
After rebuild all and re-run myproject' tests I can confirm
1) r257859 FAIL
2) r257859 + patch fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84580
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84578
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584
Bug ID: 84584
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
dominated_by_p)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #4)
> Tried to re-create locally, I've gotten two ICE's using the provided
> testcode snippet, neither look quite like the originally reported issue.
You are right. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
y[i] = i;
for (j = 0; j < N; j++)
{
if (j > 500)
{
x[i][j] = i + j + 3;
y[j] = i*j + 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84426
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84427
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
We have
(unsigned int) (long int) *(const long int &) &b
and cxx_constant_value -> maybe_constant_init_1 doesn't evaluate it now:
5154 if (!is_nondependent_static_init_expression (t))
5155 /* Don't tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84585
Bug ID: 84585
Summary: internal compiler error: in get_local_decls, at
cp/name-lookup.c:3654
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Given:
class C {
static const long b = 0;
static const unsigned c = (b);
};
class D {
static const long b = 0;
static const unsigned c = b;
};
template class A {
static const long b = 0;
static c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
It looks like we shouldn't skip the evaluation when ALLOW_NON_CONSTANT is
false, similarly to the CONSTANT_CLASS_P case:
@@ -5137,10 +5147,10 @@ maybe_constant_init_1 (tree t, tree decl, bool
allow_non_const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84443
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84471
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Which means either locations the FE assigns to trees are off or the gimplifier
produces stmts with such locations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84585
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84440
--- Comment #2 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> gcc tells you when warning which switch you can use to disable the
> diagnostics.
---
warning: unknown conversion type character 'P' in format [-Wformat=]
---
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84576
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BTW, when using creduce, if the original is valid or has just one error or
something similar, please try to write the script such that it will not confirm
a reduction which has also other errors, otherwise yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84482
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84485
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84586
Bug ID: 84586
Summary: Incorrect acess checking with inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84576
--- Comment #4 from Vegard Nossum ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> BTW, when using creduce, if the original is valid or has just one error or
> something similar, please try to write the script such that it will not
> confirm a r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84426
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0.1
Target Milestone|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
unaligned loads from non-aggregates should be fully supported these days even
on strict-align targets where they will result in bitfield extracts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84586
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84512
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|tree-ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84587
Bug ID: 84587
Summary: [8 Regression] Local variable initializer goes out of
scope since r247793
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
...with that we get the original ICE in PR84325 back:
internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘(const
seconds){operator""_s<'1', '0'>()}’ of kind implicit_conv_expr
constexpr static inline seconds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84587
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I forgot to mention that the revision was fix for PR70167.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #24 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #23)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> ...
> > Isn't that
> > an old data file you forgot to remove?
>
> After rebuild all and re-run myproject' te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84588
Bug ID: 84588
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(contains_struct_check())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84515
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 84148, which changed state.
Bug 84148 Summary: CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by
default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84439
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79802
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84533
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84536
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.4, 4.8.3, 4.9.0
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84589
Bug ID: 84589
Summary: Failure to diagnose conflicting declaration of struct
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> After several people including have gone down rabbit
> holes trying to fix this bug, I have found a patch!
The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-02/msg00181.html fixes several
tests in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84552
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Probably related to us doing SCEV analysis w/o updating SSA form but
follow_copies_to_constant and degenerate_phi_result not honoring that.
The following would fix this:
Index: gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.c
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
eprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
Version:
xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180204 (experimental)
built from git fdae6180ad24fa6303fa046114f3e4b66b8db34d
Version 7.3.0 don't seem to be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591
Bug ID: 84591
Summary: Compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_10.f03 with
-fdefault-integer-8 gives errors
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84590
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84587
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84590
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r238559. I can take a look later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #25 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Feb 27 14:11:08 2018
New Revision: 258033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258033&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make groups more generic (PR gcov-profile/84548).
2018-02-27 Martin Lis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-05 00:00:00 |2018-2-27
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84587
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #2)
> The testcase has undefined behavior; the initializer_list array only lives
> until the end of the initialization of 'a'.
>
> 11.6.4p6: The array has the same life
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #38 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This is a symlink to /home/eric/build/gcc/mips-linux/pr83496.c which
> does not work on most people's machines ;-)
It didn't really work on mine either after all so I quickly changed it. ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84590
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40142
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 27 14:45:46 2018
New Revision: 258035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258035&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84466
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
Bug ID: 84592
Summary: [openacc] lto1: ICE in input_varpool_node, at
lto-cgraph.c:1424: for CSWTCH symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
se include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
Version:
xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180204 (experimental)
built from git fdae6180ad24fa6303fa046114f3e4b66b8db34d
Version 7.3.0 don't seem to be affected AFAICS. gcc trunk on godbolt.org (8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84593
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
Jan Nordholz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
