https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even when you find another PR for __builtin_longjmp (clearly RA related), that
doesn't mean that __builtin_{setjmp,longjmp} are totally broken and should not
be fixed on aarch64. As ruby (which for some cry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521
--- Comment #14 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> Even when you find another PR for __builtin_longjmp (clearly RA related),
> that doesn't mean that __builtin_{setjmp,longjmp} are totally broken and
> should not be fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Bug ID: 84526
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in generic_overlap at
gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:927 since r257860
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84525
--- Comment #2 from Zhao Chun ---
Thanks for you explain.
It looks some weird to me.
If the type was int64_t or others, this can work.
Is there some specs to say that __int128 is 16-byte aligned?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84525
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Zhao Chun from comment #2)
> Thanks for you explain.
> It looks some weird to me.
> If the type was int64_t or others, this can work.
No, it would be invalid too. It may appear to work.
> Is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84525
--- Comment #4 from Zhao Chun ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Zhao Chun from comment #2)
> > Thanks for you explain.
> > It looks some weird to me.
> > If the type was int64_t or others, this can work.
>
> No, it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84525
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I wrote it above. memcpy or packed struct. And there is no reason to think
about memcpy as something inefficient, GCC will turn those single element
memcpy calls into efficient unaligned loads or stores.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84525
--- Comment #6 from Zhao Chun ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> I wrote it above. memcpy or packed struct. And there is no reason to think
> about memcpy as something inefficient, GCC will turn those single element
> memcpy call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
A side note, this shows how badly we need a type demotion pass, perhaps just on
the LOOP_VECTORIZED copy of loop before vectorization:
vect__27.7_175 = [vec_unpack_lo_expr] vect_v_16.5_173;
vect__27.7_17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43492
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43492&action=edit
Parallel build of make all-host on 128 core EPYC machine (log file)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #17)
> The results in comment #13 seem to be missing some compilations --
> I would have expected to see more files from libcpp in there.
> As it is I only see directives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84519
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Feb 23 09:07:24 2018
New Revision: 257928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 84519 Handle optional QUIET specifier for STOP and ERROR STOP
Fortran 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It reproduces even with __attribute__((noipa)) on foo, so the problem is just
in that function. In assembly we can see:
vpsllw $8, %zmm6, %zmm5
addq$64, %rdi
vpmovzxwd %ymm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
Bug ID: 84527
Summary: missed optimization for special ternary operation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84168
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84168
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> So where is ytab.i?
Sorry, it's here:
$ cat ytab.i
struct
{
char a[1];
} b;
int i;
void c (void) { __builtin_strcpy (&b.a[i], b.a); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Thanks. Doesn't need -m32, actually.
923 /* There's no way to distinguish an access to the same member
924 of a structure from one to two distinct members of the same
925 structur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
One more test-case with a bit different BT:
$ cat sis.i
typedef struct
{
int a;
char b[10];
} c;
c d;
unsigned long s;
void e (void) { __builtin_strncpy (d.b, (char*)&d, s); }
$ gcc -O2 sis.i -Wall
duri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ---
For x86 we produce for sample:
movl8(%esp), %eax
cmpl%eax, 4(%esp)
setge %al
movzbl %al, %eax
leal-1(%eax,%eax), %eax
ret
which could be expressed w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84524
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43493
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43493&action=edit
gcc8-pr84524.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
Bug ID: 84528
Summary: [8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/960419-2.c -O3
fails with -fno-omit-frame-pointer
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Laurent GUERBY from comment #18)
> Marxin, you have a cfarm account and access to gcc22 / 23 / 24 which are
> mips64 machines. If you need to change ssh keys see here:
> https://cfarm.tetaneutral
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84519
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jb at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84509
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|STOP and PAUSE statements |STOP and ERROR STOP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534
Bug 78534 depends on bug 83344, which changed state.
Bug 83344 Summary: Use of uninitialized memory with ASSOCIATE and strings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Try with the unsigned arguments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80598
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.2.1, 4.5.4, 4.7.4, 4.8.5,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60212
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 12:35:30 2018
New Revision: 257930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83148
* trans-const.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 83148, which changed state.
Bug 83148 Summary: [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can you please provide the requested reproducer, even if large? Otherwise
there is nothing we can do about it and it will be closed as
RESOLVED/WORKSFORME.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70468
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 23 13:32:41 2018
New Revision: 257931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257931&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70468 - ICE with constructor delegation via typedef.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
Tiziano Müller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev-zero at gentoo dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Isn't this dup of PR84502 and thus fixed with r257892?
Very probably, let me test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is trying to match
#[01] (__)?pthread_mutex_init
but instead it gets
#1 __GI___pthread_mutex_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Changing that (__)? to ((__GI_)?__)? is preapproved if it works.
Those are just glibc internal aliases which are in the symbol table too though,
so if you have full debug info for libpthread.so rather than j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #21 from Laurent GUERBY ---
I'm not familiar with mips ABIs but on gcc mips machine there's 32 bit code.
root@erpro8-fsf1:~# file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, MIPS-II version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
linked (uses sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Feb 23 14:17:35 2018
New Revision: 257932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix tsan race_on_mutex.c testcase (PR80551)
The testcase did not m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84529
Bug ID: 84529
Summary: INQUIRE fails on "recycled" internal units
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Bah, this'll be https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02061.html . I
hadn't realised that the -fomit-frame-pointer handling was the reason it was no
longer a problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk. Does this actually fail on GCC 7? The regexp there should
work AFAICS.
movl4(%esp), %eax
movlgs, %edx
movl%edx, (%eax)
ret $4
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size foo, .-foo
.globl gs
.data
.align 4
.type gs, @object
.size gs, 4
gs:
.value 100
.value 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84447
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My understanding is that this is because cand->fn in this case (the B ctor) is
not DECL_DELETED_FN, but strip_inheriting_ctors (cand->fn) is, we somehow
haven't tried to instantiate it (bailed early) and when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84529
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84412
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albandil at atlas dot cz
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84531
Bug ID: 84531
Summary: c/c++: bogus warning for functions with different
argument lengths but compatible arguments
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> ..., but that just means it is not the right code for f1 and f3.
Right, that produced code depends on the sign of the condition arguments seems
to be pretty wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, signed comparison is very different from unsigned comparison, and only
unsigned comparison < is usable for this. Borrow flag reflects unsigned signed
comparison result rather than signed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 16:22:28 2018
New Revision: 257934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83149
* trans-decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The affected bit of code assumes dstref->base is an array and doesn't check to
see if it's something else. In both of these cases it's a VAR_DECL so
TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (dstref->base)) returns null.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
>
> What is the TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) in:
> base = get_inner_reference (expr, &bitsize, &bitpos, &var_off,
> &mode, &sign, &reverse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> >
> > What is the TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) in:
> > base = get_inner_reference (expr, &bitsize, &bitpos, &var_off,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
Moved Power 8 vec_float2, vec_signed2 and vec_unsigned2 builtin tests to new
file builtins-3-runnable-p8.c. Fixed ICE for vec_signed2 and vec_unsigned2
which were found in builtins-3-runnable.c once the vec_floa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 17:55:13 2018
New Revision: 257938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257938&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83149
* trans-types.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84532
Bug ID: 84532
Summary: [7/8 Regression] std::thread::__make_invoker
prematurely unwraps reference_wrappers
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:40:14 2018
New Revision: 257941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/84506
* trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk.
Jakub, thanks for the report. This will be backported to 6 and 7 shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at uplinklabs dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84450
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:57:41 2018
New Revision: 257942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:59:38 2018
New Revision: 257943
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257943&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Any news about the patch testing on MIPS. It would be nice to move forward
with the PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019
--- Comment #8 from Allan Jensen ---
Yes, I will take a look again and produce the intermediate results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:16:00 2018
New Revision: 257945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:35:51 2018
New Revision: 257946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:37:57 2018
New Revision: 257948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:41:27 2018
New Revision: 257949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:42:43 2018
New Revision: 257950
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257950&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84532
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
CC|
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
